Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Letting off steam in a Nationwide branch!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have banked with Nationwide for over 40 years. I had a Building Society Account for most of those years, but when Halifax threw me out after me winning in Court for my Charges I went to Nationwide to open a Flexaccount. They were quite happy to do this until they checked my CF and there was my default from Halifax because I refuse to pay back the overdraft on the account they had closed down out of spite. They then said I could not have a debit card until I 'proved myself reliable and trustworthy' their words not mine. Didn't think I had much chance with the Halifax Default hanging over me for 6 years so agreed.

 

That was 3 years ago and still no Debit Card. No overdraft either, but I did not want this anyway.

 

Yesterday I received my monthly statement from Nationwide together with a second sheet telling me £30 would be deducted from my account 28 days from the date of my statement for an unpaid Direct Debit. Now I manage my money (what little there is of it) down to the last penny with a program on my computer. No debit card means I can only withdraw cash to spend so no lurking surprises there. So I studied my Statement and low and behold I discovered my 'crime'. A payment to E-bay for my monthly account charges of £4.10, but I only had £3.60 in credit until the next morning when my regular as clockwork pension is credited!!! So yet another Worldwide banking crisis had to be avoided at all costs, and I have been left to pay the price!! (and to add insult injury PayPal will only let me use e-cheque now until I 'prove' myself again'.

 

As the heading said I fumed into my local Nationwide branch today and had an almighty eppy fit - very polite but very loud. No naughty words, but I head rumblings in the waiting queue of 'quite right too', 'disscusting' etc. and I then whipped them up in a discussion of how awful the banks are today.

 

Step into an office, I am sure we can work this out - I was told - no thank you I said, changing banks, and swept out like royalty.

 

Getting home there was a message already on my machine say they had 'sorted out' my little problem.

 

Ohhhh I do feel SO MUCH BETTER:D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to this, the co-op insist funds are in your account the day before, so if a DD is due monday, and funds are paid in monday to cover, but were not there the previous friday, they bounce the DD on the monday, and charge you £30:mad:

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CC - yes the cashier duly quoted that to me, and I have always made sure of that, they apply the debits before the credit daily smack bang at Midnight. I was also informed (as if I didn't know) that everything is computerized these days - I very grandly pointed at myself and said I am not a computer, are you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CC - yes the cashier duly quoted that to me, and I have always made sure of that, they apply the debits before the credit daily smack bang at Midnight. I was also informed (as if I didn't know) that everything is computerized these days - I very grandly pointed at myself and said I am not a computer, are you?

 

Yes but my point is that, if everything is computerised, i.e. instant, when the DD is to be paid, the computer checks funds are available (which they are cos its monday), then why not pay it, it doesn't matter what the position was last friday:-x

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I see your point, and I have queried it on several occasions and they just repeat Debit out first then credits, sooooo......round we go in another circle - we will never win against computers.

 

Many years ago I went on holiday to Florida. Because of the time difference and with confirmation from my bank I had timed it to arrive at 6pm Local Time (11pm UK). By the time I got to the Car Hire Desk it was gone Midnight in UK so tried to pay by my Debit Card - Declined and their rule was you could not put it through again within 24 hours - so we were stranded. Apparantly, debits come out at middnight credits anytime up to 6am!!.

 

Guess whos' favour that works in!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but it's often the attitude of the staff that's doubly galling.......for myself they can all get the bleeding sack for all I care.........perhaps then they won't be quite so dismissive of those in difficulties ........They may even realize the devastating effect their banks greed & mendacity can have on ordinary people

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I undestand, the computers check the account once and once only to see if the money is there to pay a DD. If the computer checks at 8:15am and the money isn't there, it won't check it again, it'll just bounce it - I worked for Lloyds in the early 1980's and then they had to wait unitl midday before processing the returned DD's, cheques and Standing Orders - but in those days people did that job not a machine.

 

I had a huge row with Natwest over this very issue a couple of years ago and that is what they told me. Personally, I think these DD's should be taken at the end of the working day not the start of it. This would allow customers time to get money into the account to cover them.

Welshwizard QC (Quite Content):rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This smacks of lazy/cheap programming. It would not be difficult to cache all of a day's transactions and action them all at close of business that day.

 

Mind you, they still seem to be unable to process same day electronic transactions like they promised. If I can video call my brother in Australia in real time for free (Skype) then sending a few electrons across the City of London should not be beyond the wit of man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I think these DD's should be taken at the end of the working day not the start of it. This would allow customers time to get money into the account to cover them.

But that would remove a very profitable way of gaining charges from unsuspecting customers ....... or am I just being cynical :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a DD which is supposed to pay 10 per week from my current account into a savins account with the same Bank. I hadnt enough money in my account so they twice tried to debit it and charged me £60 for the privelige of not being able to debit my account by a tenner,

 

Yes BANKER does ryhme with ******. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

....and they wonder why peoples perception of banks has gone from being seen as somewhere where trustworthy people work and pillars of the community (1950-60ish) to the blood sucking vultures they are these days.

 

EVERYTHING is about the bottom line and EVERYTHING is stacked against the "consumer" and towards the bank

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When we banked with Nationwide we queried why we were getting DD refused and bank charges applied when we had sufficient funds in the account. We were informed by the manager that dd were taken from the account between midnight and 3am, and that credits were applied between 3am and 6am. With rules like that, you've no chance.:mad:

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

And yet on every Natiuonwide statement I've had, it always shows credits before debits :rolleyes:

 

The entire industry is bent from top to bottom (and left to right too) :mad: :mad:

 

I don't know if this is still the case. It certainly was 2yrs ago.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

some banks do have systems in place to pay an item that would be returned otherwise on the date of payment, however, it doesn't seem to take into account online payments(from my reading across the forums). Furthermore, to JonCris comment about bankers, got the T shirt now :D

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Nationwide certainly have it in for me.

 

I have a severely disabled granddaughter (20 years old). I am her legal appointee and as such I have all of her Benefits paid into my bank account so that I can deal with all of her bills etc.

 

Her Housing Benefit did not appear in my account this week and when I queried this with Benefit Office they said it had been returned by Nationwide because it is on behalf of a third party and because of Money Laundering Rules they are not going to accept these payments anymore. Now her rent is due on 28th April and this was the 2nd 2 week payment for April. So I am now not able to pay her private landlord!!

 

I telephoned my local branch, and I have to admit the Manager (the one I shouted at last week was very nice - she understood the problem and was very upset that HO had not even informed her or me that they had done this. I am getting a cheque through the post from HB in the next few days, and she has said she will treat this as cash until we can sort this out!

 

This is going to cause big problems for me as I cannot even open a basic bank account at present, even though I have no CCJ's I have still been turned down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much more ridiculous is this damned country going to get?

 

A BANK/Building society wont accept payments from the GOVERNMENT

 

Its getting beyond a joke...complain to your MP, everyone...im just getting sick of all this nonsense now:-x:-x

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone on here recommend a Citi bank basic account as they do not credit check unless you request an overdraft, so I didnt, but they still credit checked and turned me down. So I really don't need to get too many checks on my file at present - this is what is worrying me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...