Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bailiff Andrew James Enforcement CTAX debt at my door a few weeks ago


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

e-mail the council tell them that your offer of £10 per week has been refused tell them they want £80 per week and that if you don't pay this amount they said the will come and remove your goods

tell them that they will not put it writing that you have made this offer and that if you don't pay £80 they will remove your goods remind them that this levy may indeed be unlawful and they are using it against you to to try to make you pay an extortionate amount of money weekly and you know that if you agree to that amount your account will go into default ask them to send you a breakdown of your account including bailiff charges

 

if you don't want anyone to know i understand

 

but if you want to

how much was the liability order for

how much are the bailiffs charges if you know

 

1st visit

2nd visit

walking possession fee

levy fee

Edited by hallowitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi hallowitch dont realy mind ppl knowing how much i owe..

it started off at £841

visit 1 £22.50

levy fee £48.00

walking possesion £11.00

brining it to £922

i paid £80 off this but on the second letter there is no notice of further charges but the amount owing on this one is £1065..

hope you can understand this!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

when the council send the breakdown of bailiffs charges you can bet that there are van fees on it tell them you offered £10 wk but at a push you could offer £15 remind them you are on benefits working tax credits are you one parent family

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have to be very very careful on this one... it seems that when the goods were levied your probably signed a walking possession - hence the added fees. If this is the case the bailiff can enter the property (by force if necessary) to remove goods that you have signed the walking possession for. Additionally, a levy in part is a levy in full and additional items CAN be taken exscept those exempt by statute - such as chairs to sit on, table to eat off etc. My advice would be to try to come to some kind of payment plan with the bailiff on a reasonable amount that you can afford to pay without going into default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have to be very very careful on this one... it seems that when the goods were levied your probably signed a walking possession - hence the added fees. If this is the case the bailiff can enter the property (by force if necessary) to remove goods that you have signed the walking possession for. Additionally, a levy in part is a levy in full and additional items CAN be taken exscept those exempt by statute - such as chairs to sit on, table to eat off etc. My advice would be to try to come to some kind of payment plan with the bailiff on a reasonable amount that you can afford to pay without going into default.

thanks for that so does it mean that they can take the chairs but not the acctual table ?????

as for coming to an aggrement i have tried today all i can afford is £10 or £20 and that is leaving me with nothing at all i know they say that the bailiffs bill has to come first but im sorry but my kids come before any of them....

Link to post
Share on other sites

when the council send the breakdown of bailiffs charges you can bet that there are van fees on it tell them you offered £10 wk but at a push you could offer £15 remind them you are on benefits working tax credits are you one parent family

sorry for not replying earlier but have spent all day in the drs....

right i do get child tax but that is very little and i mean that its sad what they awarded me..and i work 8 hours a week so all in all i dont get that much a month but my ex pays my rent and all the clothes for our children..but as he sometimes stays its easier not to claim anything as we have a few nosy neighbours...but i will be e mailing the council now

Link to post
Share on other sites

A claim is a little known document that when i worked in the business managed to stop nearly every job in it's tracks. It would mainly come from people who's ltd company was at their home, or if just the debtor didn't live there. It must contain amongst other things the important sentence: "I personally own all the goods at this address, nothing is owned by the company, it has no assets and is ceasing to trade" (Make sure name of owner of goods and address is on it plus signature and case number).

 

I would call this a Statutory Declaration. Am I right?

 

Most Stat Decs are witnessed by a solicitor. Is this a requirement with a Claim?

hi tomtubby you wrote on my thread about putting in a letter about all the things i had on hp is this what it is a claim letter???
Link to post
Share on other sites

did you ask the council to send you there code of practice for bailiffs collecting council tax

 

i found this its a post by B.A.Ts from 20th September 07

don't know if it will be any help to you but is an interesting read

 

The bailiff must at all times carry and provide photographic proof of their identity (County Court general certificate issued under Section 7 of the Law of Distress amendments Act 188:cool: when visiting a property to distrain. The bailiff must at all times make clear to the debtor the purpose of his visit and the fact that he is acting on behalf of, and, as agent of the Council. Visits to be after 8am and before 9pm, no visits on Sundays or bank holidays.

The bailiff must at all times carry the written authorisation of the Council, to be shown on request and must hand to the debtor or leave on the premises the relevant documentation including details of costs incurred and procedure, legislation (Reg. 45) relating to distress and any additional guidance notes. The debtor will be invited and is required to sign any walking possession agreement (which lists all goods distrained upon) at the time that the distress is levied, in presence of the debtor or the partner only after its meaning has been explained and understood by the debtor.

Only a bailiff properly vetted and trained by the authorised firm and under the control of a bailiff who is certificated by the County Court may levy distress or remove goods in respect of liability orders on behalf of the Council. At least 2 partners or directors of the firm must be members of Certified Bailiff Association (CBA) or Association of Civil Enforcement Agents (ACEA).

Bailiffs and employees, contractors and agents of the bailiff firm must be aware that they represent the Council in their dealings with debtors. They should at all times act lawfully and in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. They should also act in a responsible, professional and courteous manner and be aware that their behaviour, appearance and attitude have a great influence on the success of the debt recovery process.

The bailiff must adopt a firm but correct attitude when dealing with the public, they must be polite and courteous and avoid being provoked by vexatious debtors. In the event of a breach of the peace occurring as a result of a bailiff visit, the Council must be debriefed of the circumstances as soon as practicable.

The bailiff must comply with Data Protection legislation where applicable and should be aware of the relevant Articles in Human Rights legislation.

Upon receipt of any instruction to levy distress, the contractor shall ensure that a visit is made to levy distress within 14 days from receipt of the instruction.

Where more than one Liability Order is held for a debtor, the bailiff where practicable will attend the property for all liability orders at the same time, with only one set of costs being made. 'First Call' and 'second call' visits must be made on different days.

If on attendance, contact is made with the debtor, the bailiff should attempt to recover the amount as quickly as possible, taking into account the circumstances of the debtor. Wherever possible, if payment is not made in full at the time of the first visit, the debtor should be given the opportunity to enter into a walking possession agreement or instalment arrangement (instalment arrangement at no cost to the debtor other than the direct cost of making a payment). Enquiries should be made as the eligibility of discount or rebate. Information regarding employers or benefit details should be requested.

Arrangements for payment of the total amount due can be agreed at the bailiff's discretion over a period of up to three months for Business Rates. Council Tax arrangements should be made over a period of up to six months but a period of up to 52 weeks can be considered if the debtor's circumstances warrant this. If the arrangement for payment offered is beyond these timescales and the bailiff considers it inappropriate to remove goods or there are exceptional circumstances the bailiff should refer back to the Council before agreeing to an arrangement exceeding these timescales.

The bailiff must take no action if it appears that no responsible adult is present at the debtor's address. If an adult is present the bailiff must attempt to establish their identity. If the debtor is unavailable the bailiff must ascertain when they will be available. No reference will be made to the nature or purpose of their visit. The bailiff should be aware of the sensitive and confidential nature of this work and should take care to ensure that information regarding the debtors circumstances are not passed on to or discussed with a third party. If children are present the debtor should be encouraged to ask them to leave the room. Any documents must be left, marked private and confidential, in a sealed, clearly addressed plain envelope.

 

The bailiff should at all times use his professional judgement to refer back to the Council if he considers that, due to the personal circumstances of the debtor, it would be inappropriate to proceed to levy distress. In particular, cases such as:

  1. appears to be over 70 years of age and it appears may be easily confused
  2. appears to be severely physically or mentally ill, severely disabled or suffering mental confusion
  3. has young children and severe social deprivation is evident
  4. is disputing liability or claims to have paid, applied for rebate, discount or any other relief not yet granted, recommend, levy distress and then report to the Council
  5. is heavily pregnant
  6. is in mourning due to recent bereavement (within three months)
  7. is having difficulty communicating due to profound deafness, blindness or language difficulties
  8. is unemployed and provides proof that they are in receipt of Income Support or Job Seekers Allowance (Income Based), payments from the Department of Works and Pension (DWP) and details are obtained of the debtors National Insurance number
  9. is consulting his or her local councillor or Member of Parliament
  10. long term sickness or serious illness including the terminally ill

Please note: Points 3, 5 and 8 do not apply to Business Rates.

Before attending with a van in order to remove goods, the bailiff must send to the debtor, a letter warning of the intention to send a van and also warning of the costs involved in such a van attendance. However, if there are circumstances that indicate the giving of prior notice may compromise the ability to remove goods (that is company about to go into liquidation or debtor about to abscond) then attendance with a van can be made without a letter being issued.

ln the event of the need to force entry to the debtor's premises, the bailiff must obtain the express permission of the Council's Representative before doing so.

When the debtors goods are removed and sold at public auction, the Council and the debtor must be provided with a full statement itemising the goods sold, the amount realised, a breakdown of the costs incurred and a statement of the amount subsequently outstanding or overpaid as appropriate. The debtor should be notified of the date, time and place of sale, to give the opportunity to make payment and return their goods. Any goods uplifted must be transported and stored with due care and attention whilst in their care, with relevant security and insurance provisions. The bailiff should not remove goods for sale unless it is anticipated that the sum realised will be sufficient to settle a reasonable proportion of the account outstanding to the Council (30% to 50%), including costs. Rule of thumb is that the value of the goods can be divided by 5 to give an approximate auction value.

Please note: For Business Rates in some cases you may still wish to proceed to remove if the value is less than 30 - 50%, i.e. so that ongoing trading ceases or if it is likely to become insolvent.

 

ln the case of Council Tax debts, no goods should be removed from sale which fall within the categories listed in (The Council Tax Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 (as amended) being:

  1. basic clothing, beds, bedding and household linen
  2. the main form of cooking - if the debtor has a cooker and a microwave oven, it would be in order to seize the microwave oven. If the debtor only has a microwave oven, this must not be seized
  3. fFridges, freezers and essential room heaters
  4. dining table and chairs
  5. Washing machine, vacuum cleaner and iron
  6. toys primarily for the use of any child who is a member of the debtor's household
  7. articles reasonably required for the care or upbringing of a child who is a member of the debtor's household
  8. medical aids or medical equipment reasonably required for the use of the debtor or any members of the debtor's household
  9. articles which are required for safety reasons in the home
  10. any goods bought with a Social Fund loan or grant
  11. any items of a personal nature with a nominal or no cash value, for example, videos of family occasions, family photographs or pictures, etc.
  12. any other items protected by law
  13. such tools, books, vehicles and other items of equipment as are necessary to the debtor for use personally by him or her in his or her employment or business

Please note: in the case of Business Rates 13 does not apply.

Only goods belonging to the debtor may be seized, goods subject to higher

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes tottys its proper name is a statutory declaration

 

I really don't think it is, but oh well, call it what you will, a claim's a claim!

 

tomtubby, i'm upset about my PMs. I would have liked a response from you on that particular PM. :(:(

".....till Debt do us part...." :cool:

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all had an e mail from the council and you was right hallowitch they have charged for a van £225...

am waiting for a means of earnings form off them now so with a little bit of luck even if they dont take the debt back maybe they can get the bailiffs to agree to £10 per week as they can see i simply cant afford £80

thanks so much for all you help you are all absolute stars on here!!!!;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have the council made any comment yet about the table and chairs on the Levey if you can get them to agree that they should not have been on the levy then they must remove all charges connected with it

if you cant i would question the amount they are charging for the van fee

it should be reasonable costs £225 is not reasonable costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

have the council made any comment yet about the table and chairs on the Levey if you can get them to agree that they should not have been on the levy then they must remove all charges connected with it

if you cant i would question the amount they are charging for the van fee

it should be reasonable costs £225 is not reasonable costs

no they have not said anything they were supposed to be contacting the bailif comp to see what they had put on the levey but nothing regarding that matter..i to think thats way to much for van fees i was thinking of phoning a few hire comps and seeing how much they charge to hire a van out..it said in the reply i got from the council it was with the intention of removing goods so i personaly think that unless they remove the goods they should not charge as that means that if they do come back and then remove the goods they are more than likely going to slap on another £225!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they do come back they can charge this again but they must remove goods

 

getting that levy removed is you best bet ask the council why this has not been dealt with

if you can e-mail them a copy of the levy

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont know if its just me being dumb but i thought that the bailiff could not put on a van fee unless they actually took the goods...so please correct me if im wrong someone does this make the charges on my bill unlawful as they have charged £225 for a van fee they said it was for intention of removing goods..

need a reply as i have had another letter from them saying they are coming to take things now but i was hoping the council were helping me out as i have been speaking to them they have sent out a means to earnings ~(i think its called this) and they have told the bailiff that they had to enter in to another payment plan with me but they told me that my offer was not sufficient enough and that i had to pay the £80 per week which i just dont have what are my next steps i think that if i can prove that the charges are unlawful then i can get the Levey removed and the council will take it back...

please help again many thanks...

Link to post
Share on other sites

morning all .

have sent a means of earnings in to the council along with a photocopy of the levey that the bailiff done as i am still waiting for a reply about the table and chairs...im getting very mixed replys over this some ppl are saying that no way can they take the table and chairs and some are saying corse they can..

starting to get fed up now its realy starting to make me ill....

what would happen if i was to pay the council minus the £306 bailiff charges are the bailiff still entiteled to break in to my house and remove goods?????

how many times do you think i can e mail the council regrding this matter before they start saying i am harassing them??????

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just recived an e mail from the council and have been told that it is ok for them to take the table and chairs!!!!

so why would it say on nearly all the sites i have seen that they are exempt????

but at least the council are trying to help me now they have put everything on hold for 7 days untill they get my means of earnings form...

Link to post
Share on other sites

am now trying to pay the full amount that i owe so the bill is for £1065 but that is with £306 bailiff charges so if i just pay the amount minus the bailiff charge staright to the council anyone knows what happens then will the bailiff still come and take my things of will the council deduct the first £306 and pay them?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

my advice is to hit him over the head with something hard and tell him to get a life, **** bags. No, really i am in the process of being threatened with "a visit" for a debt i owe, so all the best!

hahahaha like this one.....will wait for him upstairs and then say i thought it was a burgular lol...

(only joking)

Link to post
Share on other sites

morning all..

just a quick note to let you all know how im going had a e mail from the council this morning regarding my means of earnings form that i sent into them and they have said that as i smoke and have a tv that is rented and have to pay for a tv license they do not consider these to be priority debts (which of course i know) and as i can not be sent to prison for any of these i should stop paying for them so i can afford to pay the bailiff instead but he has told the bailiff company that i will now be paying £50 instead of the £80 and i have to phone them to arrange this....

this is not something i am looking forward to doing as every time i have phoned them they treat me like a piece of dirt and talk down to me and try and bully me in to paying more which they know i cant....

ahh feel a little better after that little rant lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...