Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Notice how Kev goes about his scam.  In Kahunaburger's case they left the car park well before the time shown on the ticket they had purchased.  But because Kev added on the time taken to look for a parking spot and queue to pay/try to get an internet signal he still sent them an invoice. So If you had left before the Justpark message, say at 3:55, Kev would still have managed to turn that into a stay of 4:06 and thus an overstay and an invoice. Unfortunately for Kev, judges have ruled against his reasoning.  Have a read of this famous case  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html  
    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capone response to CCA


exchange
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5021 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks cerberusalert. Are there template letters for this? Shame to reinvent the wheel if there are!

Very grateful to all on CAG who have given me hope that I can get out of debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is from RBS Mint but it makes no difference. Capone have only threatened via a monthly statement so far and are in breach as well. Might as well complain about all 4 companies I am dealing with and post a potential template!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have now started a separate thread for RBS Mint so that this is now solely CrapOne.

Crapone in dispute letter.pdf

 

CapOne Response.pdf

 

I though Ellie Renshaw was on maternity leave. Is she sending letters from home?

 

Anyway, attached my 'in dispute' letter and there response. I am sure that if Ellie had put this letter together herself she would have made a better job. They have cut and pasted every paragraph they can think of into this letter it seems without much thought for what I asked for.

 

The last paragraph on page 1 says I 'requested detailed information regarding our costs and accounting'. Where?

 

Also the next paragraph mentions 'We call you to see if we can help in any way'. They have never called me as they do not have any numbers for me! There helpful website allowed me to delete them LOL!

 

They helpfully suggest I send a SAR, but I have already sent them a CPR31.16 request so I will wait to see how they respond to that.

 

They say it is there final response and to contact the FOS which I might do.

 

The last paragraph mentions call charges but is not related to anything else written anywhere.

 

It is one of the worst written letters I have ever received and shows perhaps how busy we are all making them.

 

I will post the CPR response when I get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Time is up on my CPR request and they have found my mobile number. They call 4 times a day at more or less the same time but I never answer so it is not getting them anywhere. This has been going on for a week now.

It doesn't bother me, just have to wait for the next letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Response 3 300409.pdf

 

Got a response to my CPR 31.16 request today from crapone (attached). It's the same as other people are receiving currently from what I have seen on this site.

 

Should I write and point out that this appears to be a delaying tactic and if they 'won't be able to send any different documentation' does this mean they don't have a true copy of an agreement?

 

Also, are they right in that they can say the account is not in dispute and if they say so then that's that?

 

Fulfilling, in their eyes my CCA request, with something which does not prove that an agreement exists means that I am the one putting the account in dispute, not them!

 

Any advice/answers gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply sussex1. Would be nice to know what they have got though. So frustrating when there is no progress. Anyone know how or if I can dispute the 'in dispute' status of the account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've gone on the defensive because they don't have an enforceable CCA, you can either write and ask them for their complaints procedure & wait another eight weeks then make a complaint to FOS who in all honesty will do beggar all, or just wait for crap1 to close the account and sell it on to some sad DCA outfit who'll end up dropping it like the hot potato it is.

 

Have they sent you a default notice yet? If not, thats what you'll probably get next. If you do, scan it and post it up because they'll probably feck that up too. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice cerberusalert. I prefer the wait and see what is next approach. I have not had a default notice so far. Only lots of £12 charges added and interest.

 

Can I challenge the 'in dispute' status with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes by asking for the complaints procedure and making a formal complaint which they are obliged to investigate and give a response to within eight weeks. If you are dissatisfied with their response you can then escalate it with a formal complaint to the FOS which could take another 18 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your pretty much at stale mate, you say in dispute they say not. They are the supposed big company, I'd take the silent stance and let them make the next move. I've done this on my Cap One account that they sold some time ago to Rob Way and haven't heard anything for months.

 

My view is that my credit record is shot and all the time i dont hear it gets nearer to being statute barred. If they attempt to pursue i'll simply refer them to my previous letter and say i've nothing to add

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks sussex1. If I complain as cerberusalert mentioned it would make more work for them though. It might make them try to find the agreement as well so maybe I should just wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

default notiice.pdf[ATTACH]9293[/ATTACH]

 

As cerberusalert correctly said, I have now received a default notice.

 

I have attached a copy and the obvious error, also made by RBS Mint, is that they have not specified an actual date for remedy, only given 28 days from the date of the letter.

 

My understanding is they must specify a date or it is invalid.

 

Any comments appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is they must specify a date or it is invalid.

Correct, all you have to do now is wait a couple of weeks for them to close the a/c & they've managed to beggar-up just about everything they possibly could. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH]9294[/ATTACH][ATTACH]9293[/ATTACH]

 

As cerberusalert correctly said, I have now received a default notice.

 

I have attached a copy and the obvious error, also made by RBS Mint, is that they have not specified an actual date for remedy, only given 28 days from the date of the letter.

 

My understanding is they must specify a date or it is invalid.

 

Any comments appreciated.

 

 

Exactly as cerberusalert said, waste of paper, I've had those and they are not proper Default Notices, they are threats of DN's.... they just do not prescribe to law......... :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...