Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Another Employment Tribunal Question!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5516 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I submitted my ET forms and have now received a letter from my employer's Legal and Democratic Services Dept requesting additional information.

 

The last paragraph states "please provide this information by Friday 20th March 2009 in default of which I will apply to the Tribunal for an Order directing you to do so"

 

Is this normal and do I respond back to this letter or should I purely be dealing with the Tribunal itself? The letter itself is of really poor quality with one of the questions saying "Please say your raising the concern was responded to".

 

I must admit I was furious as the wrong initial was typed in the address (which happens to be the same as my other half) and they opened this letter thinking it was for them. Thank god it wasn't one of my children who opened it instead.

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you like to let us know what the questions are

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically I am bringing a case for constructive dismissal having been bullied and undermined.

 

I'm hesitant to post the 10 questions publicly, but they basically want me to give times dates, witnesses and nature of my complaint. All these points were covered at grievance meetings which incidentally I never got minutes of until after I resigned which was approx 9 months later!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, both sides are allowed access to the others evidence so they can mount defence, so the request itself is a reasonable one, however i would assume that if you have already supplied this information to the tribunal, then they should be able to contact them for copies of everything you have filed thus far.

 

What i would do is give the tribunal people a call and run it past them, as it does seem unusual for them to be contacting you directly to request soemthing that should have already been filed as evidence with the tribunal.

 

*edit*

 

Also, if you want to PM me the questions they expect to be answered i can tell you if they are relevant or not, as sometimes places will ask irrelevant questions in order to try and trip you up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What stage is your tribunal process at? When you say you've submitted your ET forms, do you mean you have submitted form ET1 to apply for a tribunal in this matter, or are things further along than that?

 

Being in the process of going through the tribunal process myself atm, I would say that if this letter is in response to your having submitted form ET1 (which the tribunals service will have copied to the respondent) to apply for a tribunal, then the company has no business contacting you directly to demand further information - the correct process is for them to submit their defence, within the prescribed 28 days period, based on the claim described in your form ET1. Further evidence will be asked for/submitted etc later in the process.

 

If you are further along in the tribunals process and are at the stage of disclosure/preparing document bundles for the respondent etc then I guess they may be entitled to ask for clarification of your evidence - though tbh I would contact the tribunals service and ask them for the opinion/advice on this.

 

Ali

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted my ET forms and have now received a letter from my employer's Legal and Democratic Services Dept requesting additional information.

 

The last paragraph states "please provide this information by Friday 20th March 2009 in default of which I will apply to the Tribunal for an Order directing you to do so"

 

Is this normal and do I respond back to this letter or should I purely be dealing with the Tribunal itself?

 

Quite normal.

 

Look at it this way, if you were deemed to have done something you deny would you not want to know the full facts?

 

If you don't provide the info then they will apply to the court for it.

 

Either do it now or wait until ordered to, or not as the case maybe.

 

Btw, you also mention you only received minutes of a grievance 9 months later.

 

What is the time frame of your claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe this site encourages this kind of thing.

 

 

*checks forum rules*

 

nope, i dont see anythign that says that a member may not PM another member for personal discussion or advice.

 

I have had several people contact me, some without even making a thread on here asking about various bits and bobs.

 

If i am wrong here please show me where it states to the contrary in the forum rules, until then, if anyone wants to PM me for any reason they may do so and if i can i am more than happy to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

*checks forum rules*

 

nope, i dont see anythign that says that a member may not PM another member for personal discussion or advice.

 

I have had several people contact me, some without even making a thread on here asking about various bits and bobs.

 

If i am wrong here please show me where it states to the contrary in the forum rules, until then, if anyone wants to PM me for any reason they may do so and if i can i am more than happy to help.

 

It is a forum, the idea being that topics are discussed in the open so that bad (incorrect) advice can be easily corrected when read by all members.

 

Messages, and advice, given by PM would not enable that.

 

I am positive them are the rules when I joined last week.

 

I'll be as diplomatic as I can, but, I certainly wouldn't act on your advice, hence, the need for your advice, in particular, to be vetted in an open forum.

 

Just my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a forum, the idea being that topics are discussed in the open so that bad (incorrect) advice can be easily corrected when read by all members.

 

Messages, and advice, given by PM would not enable that.

 

I am positive them are the rules when I joined last week.

 

I'll be as diplomatic as I can, but, I certainly wouldn't act on your advice, hence, the need for your advice, in particular, to be vetted in an open forum.

 

Just my opinion.

 

 

again, please show in the forum rules where it says that no one may do it, otherwise stop making unconstructive posts attempting to cause trouble.

 

also, i wouldnt follow any of your advice either.

 

Just my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

again, please show in the forum rules where it says that no one may do it, otherwise stop making unconstructive posts attempting to cause trouble.

 

also, i wouldnt follow any of your advice either.

 

Just my opinion.

 

I'm not causing trouble, as soon as I post, which can be one week from the next, you are on my case EDIT - Please refrain from personal comments

 

You post 'advice' everywhere EDIT - Please correct each others advice as you see fit, by posting correct advice rather than merely commenting on how poor other advice is.

Edited by elche
Please refrain from personal comments
Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted a request for help. One person in particular has been really kind and helpful. Thank you. Other posts have not helped at all.

 

I am so stressed over this issue that today I am contacting the ET to tell them I don't want to go ahead. Just going back through all my old records has made me genuinely feel very ill. Think it is time to move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Westbromfan, don't give up... you might feel bad now, having to read through all that has happened, but I promise, by dealing with this, and hopefully winning, you won't half feel better!

 

I gave up three years ago when I lost my job of 26 years - unfairly. I had a lot of other things go on as well, lost best friend to cancer, lost partner (he went mad) then lost house as well. I couldn't cope and I should bloody well have made myself cope. I still get angry about it all now, and I should be well over it. So, you have a chance to fight back, please take it - even if you lost At least you know you tried.

 

And don;t take any notice of the trolls that come on here - Godpikachu's advice is second to none in employment matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...