Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit and LCS Solicitors


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

This is my first time on here and I was hoping someone could help/advise.

I have had quite a few letters from Lombard asking me to pay a debt in 2007 from 1998. I had no previous contact. I informed them that this will be statute barred. I then recieved a letter stating that they were no longer willing to talk to me and the debt had been passed to 1st Credit. (Oh joy!) I received a standard letter asking for payment or this would be taken to court. I replied, by letter, that the debt was statute barred. I did not recieve anything else until approx Jul 2008. I once again wrote explaining that this debt was statute barred and to leave me alone. From then I have had numerous calls and letters stating the saem. Are they just ignoring the letters I have sent? Yesterday I received a letter from LCS ( a division of 1st Direct) to ask for the payment within 7 days. Good luck on finding £17,689.85 in my bank account!

As I have previously informed 1st Credit that I am unwilling to discuss this and any further correspondance will be forwarded to the OFT, is this what I should do? I have completed the OFT complaint form and I just wanted some advice before I sent it. I have also just read that the OFT have already warned 1st Credit that they must not persue debt that is statute barred or face further formal action, such as financial penalities under section 39a and/or revocation of thier consumer credit licience section 32.

Thanks for the advice

Kevin

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send the complaint to the OFT straight away. Maybe get in touch with Trading Standards and your local MP. The debt is clearly statute barred and they shouldnt be persueing you for it.

 

I'm sure somebody with more knowledge will post on here and help you even more :)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

That bit I dont know about but I'm sure somebody will be along to help. There are alot of very helpful and knowledgable people on here.

 

And welcome to the world of CAG :D

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Spoilts - will get it off straight away. DO you know if I can make a counter claim for stress and compensation?

Thanks

No. That would be getting a bit greedy.

Just send off your complaint and have nothing more to do with anyone who contacts you about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once you atate that you will not be making payments towards a debt that is statute barred they can NOT continue to pursue you...this is pure harrassment and the OFT state this too - section 2.14 (b) -

continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they

will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to

harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of

Justice Act 1970.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. That would be getting a bit greedy.

Just send off your complaint and have nothing more to do with anyone who contacts you about it.

 

Hi BankFodder,

I know that you say have nothing more to do with it but what happens if I keep getting letters and calls? Also what happens if I get a court date as threatened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep on putting in the complaints under CPUT

If you get a court claim then let us know but your defence wuld be that the alleged debt is denied and that if a debt is owed then it is statute barred.

Don't get involved in any exchanges with these people. Don't get involved in any phone calls

Link to post
Share on other sites

SEND THIS

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

Account reference: XXXX

 

 

Thank you for your letter of the DATE, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have previously contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would again point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We also insist that you supply a full written copy of your complaints procedure..

 

It should also be noted that we will be contacting Trading Standards concerning this matter.

 

Ignoring this letter and continuing to press for payment will not resolve this matter.

 

We will not hesitate to pursue this matter with Trading Standards and the OFT (I understand that you are under close scrutiny by this organisation), additionally we will seek immediate legal advice should you continue to press for payment, as we feel this may constitute harassment contrary to CPUTR, as well as the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

In addition, I hereby demand that you now supply me with information regarding your complaints procedure. Failure to comply will result in the complaint being escalated to the Financial Ombudsman Service, who will charge you for investigating my complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I urge you to fill out the 'complaints form' here - The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices (ignore the 'organisation' piece and send it to the OFT....they are under close scrutiny by the OFT at the moment !! - The Office of Fair Trading: OFT imposes requirements on 1st Credit over debt collection practices

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain by email to the OFT i done this on the 5th because they were threatening me with court action and other nasty threats even though i was disputing the debt with the original creditor!! And this was after they got a telling off!!! I got a reply from the OFT this morning saying they were sorry about the difficulties i have been experiencing with the above traders ( 1st cred) they have noted the complaint and will consider this alongside any other complaints recieved with a view to any consumer credit licensing or any other action they decide to take!!! SO COMPLAIN TO THEM the more the better, This is the email address i made the complaint to [email protected] :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...