legal eagles - re '07 rules?

[charlie*]

This really could be important......... can it be corroborated please?

 

I have been told today by a firm in the debt cancellation business that there is a Reserved Judgement in the 2007 CCAct that can, AT ANY TIME be 'activated' and this would stop challenges to the loan agreements - including pre-April 2007. I was told that this means, as of now, more or less, it will be difficult if not impossible to have debts cancelled out. This means that anyone wishing to challenge would have to wait for court claim and defend the claim or - or wait for the CCJ and then challenge that, through this firm who are set up for it.

 

From the information I have from other sources, the judges are not too keen to uphold any defence other than those where they have no choice.

 

There is no justice, except for just-us.... just-us being 'them'.

 

I may be talking through my hat, but that's what I was told and this particular firm will only accept clients who have CCJ's. When they have then CCJ's, that's when this firm looks for loan agreements that were unenforceable in the first place.

 

Where do we stand, doing our own thing?

 

Thanks,

 

charlie

[postggj]

pt is your man on this but my own opinion

 

$%£^%$^%

[BankFodder]

Never heard of such a thing. Don't even think that it is possible

[postggj]

can the site team be sent a pm to check out this firm

 

seems a con job again

[cerberusalert]

As I understood it a reserved judgement is when a judge gives his final judgement at a later date usually after reviewing the evidence etc.

[flyingdoc]

There is no such thing.

 

However there is nothing to stop the government simply changing the law retrospectively if they feel that they want to.

 

They could at their whim make it as if s127(3) never existed and although this would not reactivate any agreements already written off it would stop any more using this particular peice of legislation.

 

This is more and more possible as the government takes higher and higher percentage shares in the banks.

 

Watch this space.

[Peterbard]

This really could be important......... can it be corroborated please?

 

I have been told today by a firm in the debt cancellation business that there is a Reserved Judgement in the 2007 CCAct that can, AT ANY TIME be 'activated' and this would stop challenges to the loan agreements - including pre-April 2007. I was told that this means, as of now, more or less, it will be difficult if not impossible to have debts cancelled out. This means that anyone wishing to challenge would have to wait for court claim and defend the claim or - or wait for the CCJ and then challenge that, through this firm who are set up for it.

 

From the information I have from other sources, the judges are not too keen to uphold any defence other than those where they have no choice.

 

There is no justice, except for just-us.... just-us being 'them'.

 

I may be talking through my hat, but that's what I was told and this particular firm will only accept clients who have CCJ's. When they have then CCJ's, that's when this firm looks for loan agreements that were unenforceable in the first place.

 

Where do we stand, doing our own thing?

 

Thanks,

 

charlie

 

CCA 2007?

 

Did they sneak one in whilst i have been away

 

B'stards

 

Peter

[postggj]

a very warm welcome back peter

thats from all of us

[flyingdoc]

CCA 2007?

 

Did they sneak one in whilst i have been away

 

B'stards

lol I suspect he means the CCA2006 which came into force in 2007

[Peterbard]

lol I suspect he means the CCA2006 which came into force in 2007

 

Phew thank god for that i have enough catching up to do and thanks Potbagg

 

Peter

[B3rty]

have been told today by a firm in the debt cancellation business

.....so if you don't use their services now...etc etc

 

BTW..hello Peter I have enjoyed reading your old posts and used quite a lot of the information...Thanks

[yourbank]

This isn't the rankines case they are thinking about is it?

[B3rty]

Not sure if anyones seen this its a different Rankine case...which may refer.

 

Rankine