Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What do I do with Red DC Services Letter?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

*apart from the obvious use it as loo paper*

 

In January I got a letter from Red Debt collection services about a debt with Vodafone totalling £465.94. I used to have a Vodafone contract ages ago but cancelled and got rid. Besides I had a £50 limit on the account I think so there is no way I could have built up a debt of over 9 times the amount.

 

The letter is from the "Pre Litigation Department" but this is the first I've heard from them. The letter stats that the may commence legal action and apply to a court for

bailiffs,

attachments of earnings,

a charging order on my house (I rent a student house with friends can they do this?)

payments direct from my bank account via a 3rd part debt order.

 

 

I'm not sure what to do here, I assume because Vodafone isn't a credit card I can't send the CCA letter? Any advice?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the 'prove it' letter;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what to do here, I assume because Vodafone isn't a credit card I can't send the CCA letter? Any advice?
Most mobile phone contract are not covered by the Act, so initially send the prove it letter posted above. I would add to the letter the sort of evidence you require e.g. a copy of the contract and any terms and conditions relating to the contract as well as a statement of account.

 

Even if this is in relation to your old Vodaphone contract you can still dispute any sum claimed as owing on the grounds of any charges added to the account and also any unfair terms in the contract.

 

Lowells (who Red are part of) were on Watchdog recently for sending out threatograms to people for old mobile phone contracts where either they had got the wrong person or the amount claimed as owing was complete rubbish or the debt itself was statute barred. You might wish to let Watchdog know that nothing would appear to have changed, despite Lowells promises.

 

As for their Pre Litigation Department, this title is completely meaningless and you should treat them with the contempt that they so richly deserve.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most mobile phone contract are not covered by the Act, so initially send the prove it letter posted above. I would add to the letter the sort of evidence you require e.g. a copy of the contract and any terms and conditions relating to the contract as well as a statement of account.

 

Even if this is in relation to your old Vodaphone contract you can still dispute any sum claimed as owing on the grounds of any charges added to the account and also any unfair terms in the contract.

 

Lowells (who Red are part of) were on Watchdog recently for sending out threatograms to people for old mobile phone contracts where either they had got the wrong person or the amount claimed as owing was complete rubbish or the debt itself was statute barred. You might wish to let Watchdog know that nothing would appear to have changed, despite Lowells promises.

 

As for their Pre Litigation Department, this title is completely meaningless and you should treat them with the contempt that they so richly deserve.

 

Thank you both. I have changed the letter and added the following sentence - is this still correct?

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question. I would like to see a copy of the original contract that I have allegedly signed, the terms and conditions relating to this alleged contract and a statement of account.

Also thank you for the tip on watchdog, I shall look into this and contact them when I have received a reply from red.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi there,

 

I have finally received a reply from RED.

 

They have sent me the attached - if this all they need? I'm a bit concerened that the statement for account number and my vodafone account number do not match - someone has written my old vodafone account number in pencil at the stop of the sheet.

 

If this now enforcable? I haven't signed anthing on here and the numbers seem a bit random.

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

Thanks

Edited by YorkshireGirl
Link to post
Share on other sites

errr exactly how does that prove you own the debt... is your name or anything related to you on those printouts bar the pencilled in vodafone account number..

 

I would be inclined to write back stating you need proof connecting you to this debt as this could refer to anyone, and as they have yet to provide proof you will not pay until they do so. For them to seek legal redress or threaten it without providing the proof of debt is a breach of OFT debt collection guidelines.

 

A duplicate monthly bill that ties in with a value on the printouts they have provided is what they should send to be honest.

 

S.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A Statement isnt worth the paper its printed on. They need something with your signature on it like a contract. I could rustle that statement up on MS Word in a couple on minutes and at least I could incorporate a Vodafone logo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm a bit concerened that the statement for account number and my vodafone account number do not match - someone has written my old vodafone account number in pencil at the stop of the sheet.

 

 

Does this not answer your own question?

 

I would write back and say 'account in dispute since the account number of the statements provided do not match your Vodafone account number, ergo this has to be somebody elses debt'.

Take a minute to remind them that they have already produced one vodafone statement totalling this exact amount in somebody elses account number so if they were now to magically produce another statement with exactly the same totals but in your correct a/c number you will obviously be forced to have this investigated further as you saw Watchdog the other month.:p

 

In the meantime I'd be writing to the OFT complaining that they are chasing you for someone else's telephone debt.

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this not answer your own question?

 

I would write back and say 'account in dispute since the account number of the statements provided do not match your ALLEGEDVodafone account number, ergo this has to be somebody elses debt'.

Take a minute to remind them that they have already produced one vodafone statement totalling this exact amount in somebody elses account number so if they were now to magically produce another statement with exactly the same totals but in your correct a/c number you will obviously be forced to have this investigated further as you saw Watchdog the other month.:p

 

In the meantime I'd be writing to the OFT complaining that they are chasing you for someone else's telephone debt.

Dont even admit you had a Vodafone account.;)

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments:

 

I've knocked up this letter in response - its a cut and paste job but will this do the trick?

 

Thanks

 

I refer to your letter dated 9th April 2009 the contents of which are noted. I refer you to my previous letter in which I demanded written proof this debt is mine. To date I note you have failed to produce a single document which proves I ever had a contract with Vodafone.

Firstly I requested a copy of the original contract including my signature, something that you have not provided. Also the so called Statement of Account is simply comprised of a lot of meaningless numbers. The account number on the statement does not match the Vodafone account number that you allege belongs to me. This does not inspire confidence in your company. I saw the recent BBC Watchdog television program where you were found to be incorrectly hounding people for fictitious debts.

 

Until you can produce a signed copy of my original contract note that I will not enter into any further communication with you and should it be your intention to proceed with legal action please be advised that this will be strenuously contested.

Regards,

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi everyone,

 

Just wanted to come back and say a big thanks to all who helped me with this! I've been away from my uni house for teh summer and got back and recieved this letter from Lowell:

 

Dear Miss *****

We write in reference to the above account.

Unfortunatly, Vodafone have not been able to supply the statements you requested so after reviewing your account we are prepared to take a commercial view in relation to this matter and as a guesture of goodwill and strictly without any admission of liability, we have decided to close the account and write off any outstanding balance.

However, should statements become available at any time in the future we reserve the right to reinstate the balance and contact you with a view to recover the full amount owing.

 

RESULT!!! Thank you so much CAG.

 

Just one question - can I ask them to remove the default they have placed on my credit file?

 

Thanks once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Just wanted to come back and say a big thanks to all who helped me with this! I've been away from my uni house for teh summer and got back and recieved this letter from Lowell:

 

Dear Miss *****

We write in reference to the above account.

Unfortunatly, Vodafone have not been able to supply the statements you requested so after reviewing your account we are prepared to take a commercial view in relation to this matter and as a guesture of goodwill and strictly without any admission of liability, we have decided to close the account and write off any outstanding balance.

However, should statements become available at any time in the future we reserve the right to reinstate the balance and contact you with a view to recover the full amount owing.

 

RESULT!!! Thank you so much CAG.

 

Just one question - can I ask them to remove the default they have placed on my credit file?

 

Thanks once again.

Glad to see the Leeds losers living up to their name

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one question - can I ask them to remove the default they have placed on my credit file?
You could try a s.10 notice http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/586-legal-notice-issued-under-section-10-of-the-data-protection-act-1980 and have a read of; Knocked back by a DCA on a Sec 10 notice? - The Consumer Forums
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...