Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
    • Normally we don't advise playing your cards early in a snotty letter, but as you have appealed we might as well use what you wrote in the appeal against them. There is no rush, you have until 6 July to get it to them.  See what the other regulars think too. How about something like this? -   Dear Rachael & Sean, cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea you'd actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and would cough up! As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence.  Had you done so you would have seen that I appealed to your client.  Indeed the driver on the day is a textbook example of having done exactly what you should do when you do not wish to be bound by the T&Cs in a private car park. Of course none of that mattered to the spivs you represent but do you really want to put such a useless case in front of a judge? To be fair, your clients are very useful members of the human race - as comedians.  How I loved the page turner of their antics at The Citrus Building in Bournemouth.  It was chuckle after chuckle reading about them, letter after letter, month after month, insisting they were legally in the right, even through someone who had done just the first day of a GCSE law course could have told them they weren't.  Until the denouement - BOOM - an absolute hammering in court.  In fact - SLAM, BANG - managing to lose twice against the same motorist for the same car park in front of two different judges. Your client can either drop their foolishness now or get yet another tolchocking* in court where I will go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spend the dosh on a nice summer holiday, while every day laughing at your clients' expense. I look forward to your deafening silence. COPIED TO COUNTRYWIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT LTD   *  This word is used under licence from Brassnecked
    • Well yes, ... and the tax dodgers ... Trump May Owe $100 Million From Double-Dip Tax Breaks, Audit Shows A previously unknown focus of an I.R.S. audit is a dubious accounting maneuver that effectively meant taking the same write-offs twice on a Chicago skyscraper. nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM  
    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6444 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well I read your forum with much interest and thankyou so much for the information and services provided here.

Anyways I have been charged heaps for years from these, one from an old account they closed due to charges that I could not pay back etc.

 

For now though im going to concentrate on the one I am currently using then when done with that I might put in claim on my old account.

 

I am just sending off the Data Protection Act letter that requests statements with a 10 pound cheque. I am right in saying this letter goes to my local branch and not some head office place ? . .

 

Thanks again for any help I may receive from yas.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ozzy

 

Welcome!!

 

Send it to your local branch, they will probably forward it to Head Office for processing anyway, but at least you might save 30 odd pence on posting by hand delivering it. Dont forget to get a signature and dated receipt from whoever receives it from you.

 

Of course if you are posting it send it recorded delivery and then use the Track and Trace number on the Internet to find out when they received it.

 

Hope your in it for the long haul like the rest of us, if you have read the various threads you will realise they will drag their heels as much as posible.

 

Good luck!

 

Rachel

Doing this on behalf of my lovely Mum!!

 

LTSB No1 - £200+£31.70+£30 = £261.70 COURT DATE SET 8TH NOVEMBER 2006

LTSB No2 - £423 +£124.16+£80 = £627.16 DEFAULT JUDGEMENT GRANTED DUE TO NO SHOW FROM LTSB

Yorkshire - £498+£102.64+£80 = £680.64 COURT DATE TO BE ADVISED - ALLOCATED TO SMALL CLAIMS TRACK

Citi - £1600+£361.46+£120 = £2081.46 CHEQUE RECEIVED F&F SETTLEMENT 07.06.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Rachel, thanks heaps for the advise really is appreciated.

 

Ive believed for a long time that the excessive high bank charges are unfair and unlawfull but as one person not being clued up on the law etc you feel you cannot make a differance or able to fight back.

 

Its good to know that they are wrong and for once a "normal" person can win.

 

Hey on another note if anyone needs advise on gas or electric bills I know heaps about that working for powergen . lol.

 

Yeah im in it till the end tyty.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Quick question for yas, I understand you cannot give a yes or no answer to this but what are the chances of YB threatening to close my account during this process. I really do not want it to be closed down.

 

Now this however will not stop me proceeding, it will just be a differant process. I have 2 accounts one joint with my wife (the closed account because of bank charges ..... passed onto moorcroft for collection) and one that is now active and I would like to keep it active.

 

So my plan is to have my wife make claim on the closed account (the joint one) whilst I make claim on the active account.

 

I just need advise from yas that have started proceedings if they threaten to close account.

 

I think it will be a blast when 2 claims are made from the same house hold. . .

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can somone please advise,

 

Today I received a notice of intended litigation from Moorcroft advising me that I owe them 1200 from a closed YB account that was due to them closing my account because of all the bank charges.

 

I intend to claim these back so how do I reply to moorcroft and do I set up a payment plan with them when I do not agree with amount owed.

 

They want payment in full before the 9/9, if I do not respond they will take legal action.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

(it was joint account but only my name was on moorcroft letter lol)

 

Thanks,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just about to suggest that you post about this on the debt forum ozzy, but when I went to take a look I see you have already done so.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Ozzy, I have had the same letter from Moorcroft about an account that was closed by the RBS due to unpaid bank charges also (haven't started to claim these back yet).

 

They will still expect you to pay up as these debt collection agencies have no compassion whatsoever.

I don't think they care too much about whether you are in dispute with the bank about the charges however don't despair.

 

What I did was phone them and set a repayment at the lowest amount possible to me to get them not to go through with court action, knowing that I would be contesting these charges at a later date. This should give you a bit of breathing space.

 

Maybe a mod can advise you better on this matter but this is what I did anyway.

 

Hope this helps, good luck and keep us posted.

 

davg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advise appreciated,

 

Ok today received 2 letters that I believe are wrong, We made 2 claims one in my name for joint account and in my wifes name for her sole account.

 

Letter 1

 

We confirm we will be able to provide you with copies of your bank statments etc from august 2000.

With regard to your request for information relating to manual intervention there is no specific mention of manual intervention within the data protection actand as such we are under no statutory obligation to record or provide this information.

 

Is the above important to the claim ? .

Also this claim was for the joint account that was claiming in my name but letter was addresed to Mr and Mrs.

 

Letter 2

 

This one was refering to My wifes claim on her sole account but letter was addressed to Mrs my name. What an insult my name with Mrs but meant for my wife.

 

We write with referance to your request for DSA on your accounts with ourselves and would like to confirmthat the charge of 10 pounds is for the complete service not per account.

We have therefore destroyed one of the 10 pound cheques for 10 today.

 

............................

 

Ok now I called into the bank and they apologised for the missprint on the name. Also explained to me that because my wife is on both accounts they only needed one cheque to cover both accounts but will provide all information on both accs. So does this meen I have to make one claim in her name instead of the intended 2 claims one in my name and one in hers. Also the bank was reluctant to give me the letter back but I insisted I needed it back for referance, wonder why they didnt want me to have it ?

 

Thankyou in advance.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about manual intervention for now, but it might be easier to keep the 2 claims separate as YB have made tried to cause problems for some people with joint accounts.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well statments arrived this morning, not looked at them yet as travelled to work. I have the next 8 hours to add them all up and do the paperwork. Will post back and let you all know the total.

I am sure the bank has broke the DPA laws, not sure what to do about it if anyone has advise.

 

My joint account ran from 2000 to 2003 then my wife opened up her private account to keep her finances seperate. We sent off 2 seperate SAR'S .

The statments arrived to the name of Mr and Mrs. But all statments were put together in one envelope for both accounts. So now I have received all my wifes statments which surely is a breech of DPA ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you. Perhaps Mrs Ozzy should make a complaint.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Additionally I have the permission of Mr Smith to make the claim on account 00000000 who will sign this letter to indicate he will make no further claims on this account as he has read this letter and agrees to its contents.

Regarding my statements by request of S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), they arrived in one envelope addressed to Mr and Mrs Smith. As the account 00000000 is my sole account it should not of been sent to Mr Smith as he now has access to my private and protected banking. This is a breech of the Data Protection Act and I will be reporting it to the Information Commissioner

What do you think of this ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks good, except in this context 'breech' should be 'breach'. Good luck, I'll be interested to see how this goes.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unbelievable fast reply to prelim, posted Wednesday branch must of received it on Thursday and replied straight away. Got reply on Friday morning.

It was the standard reply but from the branch, not head office. However the first paragraph goes as follows.

Firstly, I would like to take this oppertunity to apologise for our head office error by sending all the statements for your joint account with your sole account in the same envelope and I pass this information on to the department involved so this error does not happen again.

Then it is pretty standard, so going to move onto the LBA now see if that makes it to the head office.

Does anyone think I should persue the statements thing or just leave it ?.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's you call ozzy. It shouldn't have happened but only you can decide if it is worth it to you.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro,

 

ok going to send this which is slightly revised, not posting it till like Tuesday so plenty of time to change content.

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

SORT CODE 00-00-60 ACCOUNT NUMBER 000000/00000000

 

Firstly, regarding your head office error with the breech of DPA with the statements, I accept and give thanks for the apology and will not pursue this matter any further but I would expect you to reimburse the ten pounds I paid for this service to my account 00000000.

 

I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond positively to my letter of the 22/09/2006 and that the initial complaint was not fully investigated and

no refunds of charges have been levied to my account.

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I calculate that you have taken £810.

I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original letter of the 22/09/2006

 

I require repayment in full. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interestplus my costs without further notice.

 

 

Faithfully,

 

 

Me

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey im at work so not got the post yet but just checked online banking and

17/10/06ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT CREDIT 10.00 CR

 

So this must be my SAR money back.

Firstly, regarding your head office error with the breech of Data Protection Act with the statements, I accept and give thanks for the apology and will not pursue this matter any further but I would expect you to reimburse the ten pounds I paid for this service to my account 00000000.

 

First part of my LBA.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...