Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax/ Exemption Q


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help please?

 

Due to various circumstances this year, redundancies, general credit crunch issues, we fell behind on our council tax but we are now in a position to pay the full amount off that is outstanding.

 

The issue I have currently is I am a student and in September I sent my exemption certificate to the council by recorded post. The exemption was actioned for October/November then the full amount was (ie 2 persons) reverted to from December.

 

After much too-ing and fro-ing the council said they hadn't received it despite actioning it and me having the electronic proof of delivery.

 

I was told it would be looked into.

 

I didn't hear anything back from the council and I called today to pay in full and was told they wouldn't be applying my student discount :?. I was told because we were in arrears they don't have to action an exemption. This is the first admission I have had verbally that they have had the certificate.

 

I asked why and they just replied 'because you are in arrears' but I want to pay it off now but obviously I do want my student discount to be applied.

 

Can they refuse to apply a discount because we were in arrears? Can I appeal.

 

We don't actually have enough money to pay the full amount back just what it would be with the student discount.

 

Thanks for any advice,

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't refuse to award a discount/exemption as long as sufficient evidence has been provided that you are a student for the period in question. Council Tax legislation does not set out any deadline for the application of discounts or exemptions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you can help, pls, I've been around the houses trying to get some advice in this one..

 

My local Council is threatening me with Bankruptcy, as they are trying to hold me liable for Council Tax for the period 1997 - 2002.

 

Firstly, they have failed to update their records with details of Tenants who

were resident for the period in question.

 

They seemed to have been issuing penalties and liability orders and sending them to an address with which I have no connection... Someone with a similar name was resident at this address... They assumed it was me..

 

I only found out about all of this in Dec 08, when they seemed to have traced me to my U.K. address... I received a letter from Solicitiors informing of the situation and I decided to firstly contact the Council.. When I challenged the person that their records were not upto, mentioned the Data Protection Act and their obligations..(My understanding is that any information a public organisation holds has to be factually correct and they are obliged to correct any errors) I was told the information was correct to their knowledge......

 

I then asked how I was linked to an address with which I had no connection... The reply was.... oh, we've sorted that matter out now...

 

You'll have to contact our Solicitors and I was duly given their details...

I firstly phoned the Solicitors and advised them I would write to them.. (10th Dec 08). As I live overseas I emailed them questioning liability and raising the above points...

Dear Mr Simon Marks,

I write further to our telephone conversation yesterday afternoon concerning the above property.

I understand your company has been instructed by Coventry City Council to commence proceedings to obtain outstanding Council Tax for period 1997 - 2002.

As mentioned during our brief conversation, I explained the above property was occupiedby tenant(s) who were responsibile for payment of Council Tax. The Council claim theydo not have this information, however this is incorrect as they were kept updated when a tenant moved in/out.

Furthermore, they have failed on numerous occasions to act on instructions in removing inaccurate information relating to my liability and details of tenants resident atthe property. I am yet to receive any acceptable explanation as to how my details werelinked to an address in London, with which I have no connection.

It is quite obvious this matter needs to be resolved amicably and without the need ofmatters being escalated. However, I understand the council is required to follow clearguidelines within a set period of time when pursuing Council Tax claims, when this period lapses, claims cannot be made.

I am currently resident overseas and would appreciate all communication between us to be by email.

 

 

I received an acknowledgement on (11th Dec 08) stating the following:

 

Dear Sir

Thank you for your-e-mail. We will take our client's instructions and respond to you fully in due course

Yours faithfully

Harrison Clark LLP

 

The next response I received from them was (22nd Jan 09) apologising for the delay.

Dear Sir,

With reference to your emailed communication received in December and we apologise for the delay in responding to you.

Our client's Council Tax Department have checked the records that they hold for the property and they have also checked through their Housing Benefits records. They have no details of any tenants at the property prior to 2002 and you will have to produce copies of relevant tenancy agreements for the periods of time that you state there were tenants at the property.

Our clients note that you refer to a period of liability where a manager had emailed you to advise you that the liability was zero but this in fact related to the period 14th June 2002 - 6th October 2002 and not the period relating to the outstanding claim.

We are attaching to this email a copy of our client's statement of account showing how the outstanding Council Tax liability has been calculated and we also enclose copies of the relevant liability orders obtained out of the Coventry Magistrates Court.

Would you please let us have copies of the relevant tenancy agreements and details of the periods of time that the tenants were living at the property within the next 14 days.

Yours faithfully

Harrison Clark

 

 

I then responded with the following reply on (26th Jan 08)

 

 

Dear Mr Simon Marks,

I write to confrim receipt of your email dated

I have been trying to locate the Tenancy Agreements, this is however, likely to take

longer than 14 days, as I am having to search for TA's dating as far back as 10 years.

My understanding is that such documents are only required to be kept for 5 years. Nevertheless, I would appreciate your co-operation whilst I manage this undesirable

search. I will scan and email the signed documents as quickly as possible.

I do find it quite bizarre how the Council Tax department have no record to refer to

and yet requests are being made for me to furnish details. Furthermore, I am yet to

receive an acceptable explanation of how an address in London has been linked

to me.

Thanking you for your co-operation and I look forward to hearing from.

Yours sincerely,

 

I am yet to receive a response from the Solicitor(s)... They seemed to have evaded responding to the DPA and incorrect address issues....

 

 

My questions are:

 

1. Can this be classed as MALADMINISTRATION, as they failed to update their

records and were sending their letters to the wrong address ?

 

2. Am I obliged to provide them Tenancy Agreements, as legally I only need to keep

them for 5 - 6 years. ?

 

3. As the liability orders have been issued for the incorrect address, how can I get them

set aside...? The procedure would be really appreciated

 

4. Can this not be categorised as STATUTE BARRED ?

 

5. If my case is strong, please tell me how I can take the Council Tax department to

the cleaners..?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Pakawan - sorry you haven't had a response yet.

 

First off, if there is a liability order, then it won't become statute barred.

 

They seemed to have been issuing penalties and liability orders and sending them to an address with which I have no connection... Someone with a similar name was resident at this address... They assumed it was me..

 

Are you saying you have never lived at this address?

 

Are they also saying you are liable for an address that you have lived at and have they given the address for that property?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Connif,

 

I haven't been able to access the site up until today, not sure why.

 

1. The latest statement of account issued on 27th October 2008

does show the address of the debt..

 

The address of the debtor(s) however, is an address not known to me nor

have I had any connection with the address.

 

2. I lived in the property for a short while in 1996

 

3. I have signed copy's of tenancy agreements for the period concerned

 

4. I also have letters which I prepared, signed by the tenant and by me

advising the Council of the new occupant.

 

5. What are the steps I can take to highlight maladministration by the

council, expecially in relation to the linking of an incorrect address.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...