Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I get what you're saying and that is fair enough if that's the way it is, but the issue is that the Judge has agreed that I part exchanged my car against a new car but then failed to acknowledge that it was a deposit of some form. To trade my car in and get a discount of a new car constitutes as a deposit by legislation. The Judge has conflicted himself and this is where he is misinterpreting the law.  I also shouldn't have had a scrappage discount and a dealership discount together, it says so in their terms and conditions, which in itself makes the agreement improperly executed at the very least.  This may all make more sense when I upload the trial bundle, it's over 160 pages though so taking a while to redact my information 
    • the scrappage scheme is nothing to do with the agreement ...sorry. it's an enticement to purchase a replacement vehicle. just the same as shop signs that say 50% off or whatever.  its a done and dusted deal done before you enter into the agreement for the remaining £sum. 
    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you don't have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP DCA Taken money from my account!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Barclaycard have passed my CC debt onto Credit Solutions.

 

I made a late payment to CSL a month or so ago, they told me as my payment was late I had broken my agreement with them and that my payment per month was now going up to £50 from £37 per month.

 

I told them I couldn't afford it and that I was on job Seekers Allowance, they said that was all they could do I made my last payment of £37 and then came on here to moan (I pay over the phone by card normally).

 

I CCA'd them and Barclaycard sent me a copy of my initial application form, no sign of a CCA.

 

I then waited to hear from them again as to be honest i couldn't afford to post a dispute letter at the time!

 

Well, I just checked my bank account and the **edit ** have taken £50 out of my account today!!!!!!

 

They are not meant to hold my card details, let alone take a payment without me being on the phone giving them my card details!

 

Is there anything I can do, this is theft surely?

 

I am now £4.52 overdrawn :(

Edited by citizenB
removed swear word :)

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Get in touch with your bank and tell them that monies have been illegally taken by CSL using your card details. If you do not get a satisfactory answer from them contact the DCA in question and tell them in no uncertain terms that unless the monies are replaced (along with payment for bank charges incurred), you will report the matter to the police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No DD agreement with them, I simply used to ring up on the 25th of each month and pay using my Solo card (I used to read out all the details over the phone) and they would take the £37 from it.

 

I did not authorise the payment of £50 as I hadn't rung them to make the payment! They have stored my card details without permission and taken a payment without my permission!

 

I am so bloody angry, I am seething!

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bank are saying it was done online using my signature??!!!

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had the same problem with LTSB who used OHs EXPIRED debit card to pay a company connected with them. Once someone has your debit card details they can use them as they wish, even after it has expired as we found out.

 

Only way out is to report the card lost and get another one IMO.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't let the bank wriggle out of this Inca. They are responsible for safeguarding your money. If someone has taken money from your account which has left you overdrawn, the bank might well charge you for it. So get on to them now. They have allowed an illegal transaction. Give them HEL*L!!!:-x

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeez, you don't need this at 10pm on a bloomin' Monday night do you!

 

The bank (HSBC - nothing to do with my CC debt) have cancelled my old card and ordered me a new one.

 

They said the payment was put through online using MY SIGNATURE!!

 

They have raised a dispute with their fraud department and have said the money will be back in my account in 7 days.

 

What do you suggest I do now? This is theft, surely?? I can't believe they have done it to be completely honest, my gob is totally smacked!

 

I am about to SAR CSL/Barclaycard for a real copy of my CCA as they sent me utter crap, hence why I haven't made a payment. I think I will send them a dispute and then the SAR??

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my god i would be raging :-x surely the bank can do something as my ex once paid for something online and a month later the same company charged his debit card £68 he couldn't get through to them to see what the hell was going on so he phoned the bank and the bank took it quite seriously and i would think that would be the same with any sort of company! taking money without your autherisation!! How can someone just do that without your permission is shocking!!! It's like theft taking money from you debit card is like stealing money from your bank!! If the bank didn't listen over the phone i would right down to my branch first thing going crazy!!! Hope you get this sorted as it's just not on!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In our situation LTSB told us that once you have given someone your debit card details they can use it as they wish and the bank can't stop it. Our big argument was that the account was frozen and if OH had tried to use the card it would have been rejected as the card had expired, but they paid one of their subsidiaries in that situation. Ongoing argument - they owe us 2k we owe them 1k;)

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a nightmare Goldlady.

 

I can't believe they were able to use an expired card in your case.

 

I just hope I do get my money back, £50 may not seem a huge amount, but as I have only got my JSA coming in it's a massive amount to me at the moment.

 

I am not too sure what to do about CSL though, how dare they just take it...and using my signature too!

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how things work with Solo cards, but in general if you dispute a card holder not present transaction then your bank have to refund your money immediately and then contact the company that charged it. So you get your money back and then they investigate.

 

Not sure what they are talking about when they say it was done online with your signature, there is no such thing. The only equivalent of an online signature is if you use one of the verified systems but if you gave the card details over the phone that isn't the case here. I'd imagine they don't have your pin number, but even if they did it was still a card holder not present transaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was a criminal act, Inca. I think HSBC know it and you'll get your money back, but the crime was still committed.

Who exactly told you it was done online with your signature? Did you get the name of the person who told you this?

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In our situation LTSB told us that once you have given someone your debit card details they can use it as they wish and the bank can't stop it. Our big argument was that the account was frozen and if OH had tried to use the card it would have been rejected as the card had expired, but they paid one of their subsidiaries in that situation. Ongoing argument - they owe us 2k we owe them 1k;)

 

That is just complete rubbish. If it were true if you used the card to purchase something over the internet the company could just keep charging whatever they wanted, which isn't the case.

 

All banks seem to play by their own rules when it comes to money being transferred internally. If you have a loan or credit card with them, when they take the monthly payment out they won't stop it if it leaves you overdrawn which they would if the money was going to anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Blueboy, but try telling the bank that. In our case it was a payment to Greenflag who were linked to LTSB at the time, we had a letter saying our breakdown cover had expired and then when OH paid some money into his LTSB account under an arrangement to repay the overdraft at £100 a month they paid the lot to Greenflag and then defaulted OH for not sticking to the arrangement!!!!!!!!!! The battle goes on but we have made God knows how many complaints to LTSB and they are adamant they were in the right:mad:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Press Association: One in four victim of card fraud

One in four victim of card fraud

 

5 days ago

One in four Britons have been the victim of credit or debit card fraud, research has shown.

Around 26% of people have now had their card used fraudulently, up from 21% when the same research was carried out 12 months ago, according to life assistance group CPP.

On average, fraudulent transactions totalled around £650, but 6% of people reported losses of more than £2,000.

But despite the large sums of money involved, 42% of card fraud victims did not spot the rogue transactions themselves, and only found out about them when they were alerted by their bank.

Nearly four out of 10 victims had their card used online, while 21% had it cloned when using a cash machine or chip and Pin device, with others losing money after their card was lost or stolen.

London remained the country's credit and debit card fraud hot spot, with 38% of people living in the capital having been hit by the problem, a 10% jump on the number of people who had been affected last year.

It was closely followed by Cardiff at 34%, Manchester at 29% and Brighton at 27%, where there was a 15% jump in the proportion of people hit during the year.

Kerry D'Souza, card fraud expert at CPP, said: "The dramatic increase in card fraud shows no sign of abating which isn't surprising given the desperate measures some people will resort to during the recession.

"Fraudsters are becoming increasingly sophisticated, especially when it comes to online transactions which are a particular cause for concern.

"Cardholders need to remain vigilant with their cards and take the necessary steps to protect themselves - from checking statements more frequently to keeping sight of their card when paying for transactions. It might seem like simple steps but they will go a long way in preventing fraud."

 

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's terrible Sosumi...

 

I don't know what the answer is really.

 

Cash machines tend to be just as bad by the looks of them, so how exactly are we meant to pay for anything?!

 

I guess I could just go into my bank everytime I want money can't I. Seems a bit of an old fashioned way of doing things though.

 

With regard to tonight's episode I am going to complain to OFT about CSL and see what they say. I hope I don't have to wait too long for my cash, and in all honesty if I do have to pay this Barclaycard debt I really do not want to have to deal with CSL, but what can I do if that is who BC have refered it to?!

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would never give one of these companies my card details, full stop. They have rather selective hearing, and when you say they can take x amount, they will do, then x+y a few days later and so on, until your account is empty.

 

How can you prove you didn't authorise the transaction? They will say you gave them the details and said it was OK to take more than normal as you agreed to a higher amount. The bank wouldn't think much about it if you've paid them before.

 

This is yet another reason why nothing should be agreed in a phone call, always in writing. Make darned sure that card is not useable any more and, as they've failed to supply a valid CCA, write and tell them to get lost. They do not have an enforceable agreement so you do not have to pay them anything more.

 

Which is cheaper - sending a default letter like http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/170674-reply-cca.html#post1840880 or letting them take money without even asking?

 

Hopefully, your bank will sort out a full refund and not charge you for the overdrawn amount.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Blueboy, but try telling the bank that. In our case it was a payment to Greenflag who were linked to LTSB at the time, we had a letter saying our breakdown cover had expired and then when OH paid some money into his LTSB account under an arrangement to repay the overdraft at £100 a month they paid the lot to Greenflag and then defaulted OH for not sticking to the arrangement!!!!!!!!!! The battle goes on but we have made God knows how many complaints to LTSB and they are adamant they were in the right:mad:

 

I've had a number of head banging arguments with my bank over that behaviour and never got anywhere. As I said, when the money is being transferred internally a different set of rules applies.

 

I did a quick check and it looks like charge back rules are different for Solo cards compared to credit cards, with them only being performed when fraud is involved. Whether or not this is fraud is open to debate, but they didn't have your permission and as it didn't involve the provision of goods I'd have thought it will go through ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...