Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 credit card + Robinson Way CCA letter


Nomore Baloney
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5588 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I recently sent Robinson Way a CCA request. They sent me a copy of a credit card application and several pages of terms and conditions with a printed adte at the bottom of 20.1.04, some 3 years or so after I applied for the card.

 

Caponeappformfromrobway.jpg

 

 

I understood from reading that this did not comply and wrote back with the standard default template, and also remarked that the date of their terms was 2004, and so not relevant.

 

They sent back a letter telling me they had complied.

 

 

 

Robwaylettersayingtheyhavecompli-1.jpg

 

 

 

Any advice on what to do next?

Edited by Nomore Baloney
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I not write back telling them they havn't complied and that they ARE to stop processing data etc.

 

Thought the content of their letter was quite patronising really and wouldn't mind putting my (correct) point of view accross, as I am sure they will contact me shortly after money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do nothing until they send another begging letter. They havent complied with your CCA request in any way shape or form. They know it and thats why they say they MAY issue proceedings and would also explain their offer of a favourable discount. They have no hope of getting a CCJ against you and they know it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to take a read of this thread by Peterbard-

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/93663-letters-dti-oft-regarding.html

 

in the third post he has a letter from the Department of Trade and Industry [ who are a tad higher up the ladder than Robinson Way when it comes to ruling on matters of the Consumer Credit Act] and they say "It is also a breach of the Act and the Regulations to send the application form rather than a “true copy” of the Agreement.

You can keep that in reserve or fire it off straight away. Your choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I would sit back and do nothing, Robbing Sons Way will write to you. When they do come back and get some more advice.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do like their quote

 

please be advised that by making payments you have admitted liability blah blah blah

 

well, Mr Robbingson way and Co

 

Go Read section 173(3) CCA which confirms that the debtor can withdraw consent to enforcement without fear of liability

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Oh God, not Rebecca Cooper!

 

The short application that you have been sent is unenforceable;

End of.

 

You can't blame her fro trying though.

 

Ms. Cooper/Robinson Way should take more care about the constant computer generated letters that are being sent to real people;

these constant letters could be construed as harassment!

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rebecca may be speaking the truth when she says they and CAPONE have complied with your CCA request. The problem is that what they sent is totally and utterly unenfoceable through the Courts. She is however talking balls when she states that you have admitted liability for the account by making payments. You can dispute the liability for any account at any time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post #4 by PGH7447 is the best advice - nothing to be gained by constant correspondence with Rebecca Cooper/RW/CapOne who are in denial. They know what's required of them with a CCA request - it's just a pathetic attempt to frighten you.

RW are up for sale and the chances are all the accounts will end up somewhere else pretty soon.

Clear your desk, Rebecca!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...