Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit/Halifax start of grief I think.


deepdebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everybody,

 

My first thread after 5 hrs of reading others I'm a bit confused so here goes and I hope there is someone who would spare so time to help.

 

My wife had 2 credit card accounts with the Halifax, one was Ms the other was Mrs, both about 8-10 years old. She couldn't pay the montly amounts and wrote to the Halifax 4 years ago, they asked Blair, Oliver & Scott to collect a agreed nominal monthly payment and for all this time she has not missed a payment. A few weeks ago 'Graham; from 1st crapit called with a huge list of agro, just about the same as everyone's else's experiences.

 

Now call us stupid but we sent the same nominal payment to 1st crapit, yes again we were stupid as it was a personal cheque signed which they duly cashed. Now we are just about to go and see a legal rep at our local cab to sort out a budget statement but I read with disbelief that 1st crapit ignores a cab statment and still continues along the lines of court action etc etc Lean/charge on our house etc.

 

So what should we do, keep sending nominal payments each month or stop and ask for a CCA and letter of Assignment or is it too late for all this. The 2 cards total 15k+ Sorry for waffle Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I should add we are both out of work with a who's who of credit card debts totalling about 55k. Most of which have run on nominal payments for years but a few recent changes with DCA's are starting to worry us. 1st Credit/ex Halifax, Mercer/Barlcaycard & me with Blair, Oliver and Scott. So sitting hear waiting for any nasty's in tomorrows post bag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what should we do, keep sending nominal payments each month or stop and ask for a CCA

Firstly send of for your CCA but keep sending nominal payments.

 

Your CCA request should be compled within 12+2 days, on day 15 you have the legal right to stop payment if they have not complied with your request.

 

Once you've obtained your CCA post up here removing personal details for validation only then will you be able to plan a route ahead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what should we do, keep sending nominal payments each month or stop and ask for a CCA and letter of Assignment or is it too late for all this.
I would definitely send the CCA request. Remember to send it recorded delivery with a one pound postal order and do not sign the letter. Don't lose any sleep over having previously sent them a cheque - it shouldn't be a problem.

 

As these cards are 8-10 years old it's unlikely that Halifax will have an enforceable copy. If they don't or can't produce it 1st Credit may huff and puff a bit but they will be very aware that if any legal action they take is defended they will lose.

 

I think I should add we are both out of work with a who's who of credit card debts totalling about 55k. Most of which have run on nominal payments for years but a few recent changes with DCA's are starting to worry us. 1st Credit/ex Halifax, Mercer/Barlcaycard & me with Blair, Oliver and Scott. So sitting hear waiting for any nasty's in tomorrows post bag.
I would send CCA requests for all of them and see what they come up with.
  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow thanks guys, consider the CCA requests in the post later today with a p/o x2 (2 cards ex Halifax). Letter N should do it. Hope 1st Credit doesn't get too mad.

 

Will let you know what happens.

 

I think I'll send one to Barclaycard/Mercer who recently purchased my Goldfish card account and then started with the phone calls hourly.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rory32, Thanks for reply, in total thats 12 CCA.s to post out to DCA's, like Blair, Oliver & Scott, RMA, Cabot, Mercer, 1st crud etc. There are still a few cards that have not gone out to DCA;s like Mint etc would this not cause me a lot of grief after all we only pay these about 2 pounds ea. per month on XXXX debts?? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would start with the ones that are giving you grief first. You can always move onto the others that are being reasonable later.

 

Realistically it's not going to cause you a lot of grief as it's a legal request.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should initially just get a letter back from them stating "we have put your account on hold for 28 days while we request the information from our client, blah, blah, blah".

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks rory32 for the extra info, all CCA requests gone today, going down local CAB tomorrow to see there 'legal rep' to have a financial statement prepared, now starting to think the CAB stuff could be a waste of time! will let you all know what happens. And yes I will keep this thread going to the end what ever happens good or bad!!! I read so many threads that just stop when it looks like there getting interesting. Cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCAs will huff & puff, threaten everything from sequestration to castration but at the end of the day they can do nothing without a valid CCA.

 

They dwell on the fear that they try to put into their 'victims' by empty threats & misinformation. They sail a very fine line at times & some have crossed it but with the help you'll get from this site, you'll learn how to hit back at them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cerberusalert, well my visit to the Citizens Advice Bureau didn't go well. They informed me there was a legal case in November 08 where the Judge ruled that the Credit Card Company didn't need a valid CCA and ruled in favour of the DCA. If this is the case it sets precedence and we are all done for, have you or anyone heard this??? or is it scary tactics from my local CAB???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, Just a quick question, I see 'Von Greenbach' advises I keep making the nominal payments whilst I wait for the CCA requests to be processed. Will the DCA try to use this like 'as good as admitting the debt' or is this OK. I only ask as we are due to make a payment before Jan end. Thanks all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi deepdebt - just to add my bit, once you start getting replies, it is best to start a separate thread for each one - i.e. dd v Halifax/Cap1, dd v Cahoot/Apex or whatever. That way, you will get the most relevant advice.

 

As a matter of interest, do you own your own home?

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred

 

Thank you for your advice, yes I will probably do that as it looks like these threads can get very long!

 

In reply to your question, sadly yes.

 

Citizens advice stated that 1st crudit will go for CCJ, then Charging Order then Inforcement order. Nice people at CAB.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...