Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
    • The clock is ticking for savings providers. They now have just a few weeks left to get their act together and start offering loyal customers a good deal.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

marlin/rankin, now court claim


postggj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OK UPDATE

 

HELPING A PAL

 

MORTIMER CLARK WENT FOR SUMARY JUDGEMENT

SOON SAW THEM OFF IN COURT

 

JUDGE ALLOWED ALTERING DEFENCE AS HOLDING

 

THIS TIME I PUT IN A COUNTER CLAIM FOR A GRAND AS THEY HAD NOT DEFAULTED THE ACCOUNT PROPERLY

 

NOW

 

COMPARE THE SIGNATURES

NOTICE WHAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR IN THERE CPR REF MY COUNTER CLAIM

 

CHECK OUT THE FORM ALLEDGED FROM MBNA

REALY

 

NOT EVEN A DATE AND MY NEPHEW COULD DO BETTER

 

FIRE AWAY THE COMMENTS

 

IME GOING TO HAVE FUN WITH THIS

 

scan0009.jpg

scan0008.jpg

scan0007.jpg

scan0006.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think they're the same handwriting.

 

The scrawl on the Notice of Assignment is not even an attempt at a signature, it's obviously tat. I would ask MBNA for the name of the person who 'signed' / created / designed the NoA. And if they can take time off school, would they mind being called as a witness!

 

BAE :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now For More Fun

 

The Statement Of Truth Has Been Signed By A Charlie Hooker Meehan

 

Seem A Nice Lady According To Face Book

 

But This Person Handling This Case Is Just A Litigation Assistant

Not Even A Solicitor

 

O Silly Me

 

They Dont Have Any Solicitors

Just The Name Mortimer Clark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets Keep In Touch On This One,

 

Like I Said, Ime Helping A Pal On This One,

 

They Realy Dont Like It When You Defend

 

I Bet You Got A Default Notice From Them Not Mbna

No Notice Of Assignment From Mbna, Only From Them

 

There Microsoft Office Must Be Working Overtime

 

No Worries On This

 

Cretins

please help me trying to download subject access request template letter but it wont let me put my own details in i.e ref number and soforth. in court tommorrow with marlin re car finance. long story will post at later date. only found this website today.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Cretins At Mortimer Clark Have Sent A Request For Further Infor To The Ammended Defence I Did For Him Unser Cpr

 

For Good Measure Ref No Default Notice I Quoted Claiming 1000.00 Ref Injury To His Credit Status As We All Know The Relevent Legislation

 

I Believe It Was Woolwich Building Society And Kasperov OR WOODCHESTER V SWAIN

 

Forgive My Spelling As I Dont Have The File In Front Of Me

 

Now The Questions Mortimer Clark Are Asking

 

1 The Defendant Is To Provide Full Details For Each Alledged Injury To His Credit

 

2 Confirm Or Clarify The Time Period Over Which The Alledged Credit Injury Took Place

 

3 Provide Full Details Of All Credit Applications Submitted That Relates To This Claim

 

3 State His Occupation Or Profession And Gross Annual Income (not A Chance) Provide A Copy Of His Credit History By Way Of A Written Report (not A Chance)

 

4/confirm If He Has Had Any Other Defaults Recorded Against His Credit File (not A Chance They Continue To Search His File So Have All The Info)

 

Now On Top Of That They Mortimer Clark Sent The Aq Not The Court Any Comments

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

well that so called assignment notice is going to be put to strict proof

some photo shop me thinks

now to my main question

 

ALLOCATION QUESTIONAIR COMES FROM THE COURT, NOT FROM THE SOLICITORS, ALSO THE AQ SHOULD BE RETURNED BACK TO THE COURT, NOT TO THE SOLICITORS

 

CONFIRM PLEASE

MOST IMPORTANT

 

WONDERING WHAT MORTIMER CLARK ARE UP TO

 

THEY HAVE LOST THIS ONE ALLREADY AS STARTED ACTION WHILE IN DISPUTE OF CCA REQUEST

JUDGE HAS SAID AS MUCH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange.

 

Unless those details are ordered by the Court to be disclosed, I wouldn't give them anything they want - there must be a reason they need that information?

 

The AQ should come from the Court, sealed, with the name of the Court (usually the one sending it, unless it's Northampton or MCOL, etc, in which case it's transferred to a local Court) that it needs to be returned to.

 

To be sure, I'd contact the Court where the claim is and check a) whether they have issued an AQ b) when it needs to be back c) whether they know about this "other information" you've been asked for. Depending on what the answers to those are, you may want to write a nice letter to the Judge, telling them of the antics that are going on.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok people contacted the court today

 

aq were sent out last friday from the court

he still has not received it yet

 

mortimer clarks letter was received on the previouse wed asking for it to be returned to them

 

now are mortimer clark doing a cohen

asking for docs to be returned to them and not the court, then deny receipt hoping to then get defence struck out

 

i wonder

 

car as usual was spot on

 

aq come from the court and not the claiment/solicitor

 

me think we all have to watch this underhand development for future threads

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Thing Is

Mortimer Clark Allready Know They Have Lost This One, The Judge Pointed This Out When They Tried To Get A Summary Judgement

 

They Started Legal Action While In Dispute Of The Cca Request

 

Shame Thats A No No

 

Oh Well

 

Thats Thirty Hours At £9.50 So Far

Plus Travelling Costs

 

40 P Per Mile

 

Its All Mounting Up

 

Cretins

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update

 

Just Had Lunch With Him And Still No Notification From Mortimer Clark

 

Just Phoned The Court

 

They Have Not Sent Back The Allocation Questionair Or The 200 Quid Fee

 

They Have Till 4 Pm Today Thats 30 Min To Go

 

Loving It

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...