Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Central Ticketing Limited -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I attend a hospital regularly (every 1-2 months) for medical checkups in relation to my diabetes. The hospital charges via PnD machines for the Car parking. I have never once failed to pay the Pay and Display Charges in countless visits.

 

However, after having a bit of a nightmare morning and running very late I rushed out today for my appointments and parked up only to realise I had no money on me at all and no way of paying. I live 30 minutes from the hospital so didn't feel it was wiorthwhile going to get my wallet from home as it would waste the hospitals time massively and i may have my appointments cancelled as was already late :(

 

I returned to my car to find a very official looking ticket in a sealed yellow and black checkered outlined plastic wrapping. Similar to that style you'd expect if it had come from the police. It is from a company called Central Ticketing Limited in Birmingham.

 

Not wishing to be melodramatic but I'm living from day to day money wise at the moment and just about making sure the mortgage is paid so I physically cannot afford to pay the £35 let alont the £65 if not paid within 14 days nor the £105 if not paid within 7 days of the £65 falling due.

 

By appealing (they say that it will take up to 28 days on the ticket) surely they'll just not only reject my appeal being the same company that is demanding my money but then immediately demand the £105 and take me to court.

 

My anger at this is not that I simply don't think people should pay for parking (although paying for hospital parking is another damned matter imho) it's that I have been penalised for what seems an exhorbitant amount of money compared to the £1.80 parking fee it should have been for the time i was there and that if not paid within a very short amount of time it escalates alarmingly especially when I have paid repeatedly for every single other visit and this was a one off.

 

Can anyone offer any advice as to what I should do as I'm scared not to pay them but I simply have no means to pay them either. I just about afford to pay the bills and get to work. as it is.

 

There are multiple small car parks at the hospital and there was a large sign situated outside of the disabled spots ((separate car park area) I haven't been back to read the sign but I'm guessing it covers everythign such as park here and we own your vehicle, your soul and first born) but where I parked simply said Visitor Car Park Pay and Display with no conditions on it although the grey back of the larger sign can be seen from where I parked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am not an expert in this (they will be along later) but this is a [problem] they at most have a civil contract with you for by your parking there. They can only claim damages they have lost with you not paying IE £1.80. I would ignore this as entering into any communication will only make them more aggressive. You will get 4 or 5 letters each more threatening than the last then they will go away.

 

 

I had a problem taking my B in law to hospital for treatment (cars parked on double yellow).

I could not get my car to the drop off point for his entrance so had to park in car park go and get a wheel chair and then push him into hospital for treatment (no easy task he weights 18 stone) When I asked security about these cars I was told not public property the police would not be able to do anything. So I believe the whole thing a [problem].

 

 

 

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry!

 

• do not pay

• do not contact them

ignore their letters, no matter how threatening

• they will give up and go away after 4 or 5

• they will not take you to court

 

As you didn't pay the £1 or whatever, that's all they're entitled to. Private companies cannot 'fine' you - they can only recoup their actual losses ie. the cost of a P&D ticket.

 

By all means send them a pound coin, but there's no point as they'll just keep on pestering you about the £105. The whole thing is a [problem], so just ignore them completely.

 

 

By appealing (they say that it will take up to 28 days on the ticket) surely they'll just not only reject my appeal being the same company that is demanding my money but then immediately demand the £105 and take me to court.

 

That's correct, apart from the court bit. No chance of that (of course they'll want you to think that they will)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will receive many suggestions of help from the excellent advisors on this site, and you are, of course, free to make up your own mind.

 

Either way, you are in a very powerful position, 'cos you haven't done anything wrong - well, avoiding paying in the first place is a bit naughty, but you didn't wilfully set out to do that, did you?

 

I would ignore their requests if it were me, but if you feel that you want to square it with them, by giving them what they are entitled to, then why not write back to them stating that:-

 

You will accept only ONE further letter from them; you are happy to EITHER pay them what they are LEGALLY entitled to, [£1.00 or £1.50 etc], or you are willing to attend court and let the court decide.

 

So, either £1.00, or court papers - they decide!

 

Make it clear that no other correspondence from them will be entertained.

 

Bet that pound to a pinch of Chinese excretement, that you don't go to court!!

 

That's my two pennorth

 

Sam the Eagle

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers guys, sort of puts me a little more at ease, was panicking royally about this.

 

The ticket says that repeat offenders will be clamped and will be liable to "higher penalty charges". Whilst I have no intention of ever repeating the incident I assume that they cannot clamp me for simply ignoring this one and returning in future to the same site but paying?

 

I only ask as I'll be back at the hospital soon and i depend on my car daily. It would cost me my livelihood to lose access to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The ticket says that repeat offenders will be clamped and will be liable to "higher penalty charges". Whilst I have no intention of ever repeating the incident I assume that they cannot clamp me for simply ignoring this one and returning in future to the same site but paying?

 

My understanding about clamping (which I admit isn't great) is that clamping can only take place to remedy a current contravention, not any previous act in dispute.

 

For your peace of mind also, I would draw your attention to their use of the phrase "higher PENALTY charges". No private company can charge an individual a penalty so from that you can rest asured they are going no where near a court with their paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you crem and again thanks to everyone else. I think I'm going to ignore the company and see what happens. It not like I can pay them anyways unless they suddenly were going to accept the £1.80 an from what I've read on these forums there's little chance of receving a reasonable response from the company in question :(

 

cheers guys

 

I'll sleep a lot easier now :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ticket says that repeat offenders will be clamped and will be liable to "higher penalty charges

 

First one would be illegal and the second would just mean receiving a worthless piece of paper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would strongly suggest you don't contact them, and certainly don't offer them the "due" parking fee.

 

In order to write to you, they will have to get your details from DVLA. But DVLA only hold the deatils of the Registered Keeper - they have no way at all of knowing who was using the car.

 

If CTL had any claim at all it would be against whoever was driving, not the person registered with DVLA. For instance, I may have borrowed your car today - my own insurance covers me and I had to get to hospital in a hurry so you helped me out ;)

 

If you send them anything before they've contacted you as the keeper, and certainly if you offer them any sort of payment, then they might try to use that as evidence that you were driving. If I had borrowed your car, it's hardly likely that you'd accept the keys and a parking ticket back from me, is it?

:!:Nothing I post should be taken as legal advice. It is offered as an opinion only.:!:

 

This warning is in my signature because I'm not organised enough to remember to type

it in every post.

 

And you're considering trusting me????:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I went shopping to Tesco in Ludlow on 07/11 and paid 50p to park in their car park. It was 11.49 and I did my shopping in Tesco and some other shops. I returned at 13.53 to find the dreaded yellow attachment to my car. My ticket had been placed on the dash but the high winds that day must have flipped it over via the air vent for the windscreen. The 'ticket' stated the reason as 'No Ticket' and was timed at 13.51. While examining this 'parking fine' the 'warden' approached and when I showed him the ticket which he had stated I didn't have, he informed me that it had expired by 2 minutes and I was 'fined' £70 but if I paid within two weeks it would be reduced to £40! As the amount seemed punitive and his attitude very tentative, I smelled a rat and luckily have found this website and all your comments - thank you. I am extremely disappointed with Tesco for employing these b.......ds and am seriously considering never using them again. As for their 'fine' they can stick this 'ticket' where the sun doesn't shine. By the way, my copy of the 'Adminstration of Justice Act 1970' doesn't seem to make any references to anything they can do to me, but is quite heavy on what they cannot do to harrass me into paying-up!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi I received a ticket from Central Ticketing at Tescos in Stoke on Trent as I assumed the car park was free on a sunday, most of the car park is except for about 30 spaces as I now know. my stupidity i know.

 

Legally do they have a leg to stand on if i refuse to pay as I begrudge paying a company £40 when i was actually in tesco for 10 minutes just before they shut on a sunday afternoon.

 

Any advice is appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all, Just an update on my story above. I duly received a letter from Central Parking dated 10/12/09 stating 'Reason for Issue: No Ticket' and 'Time of Issue: 1:51pm' - remember I did have a ticket which expired at 1:49. It stated that the charge may now increase to £135 plus admin costs. I then received a letter from Roxburghe DCA dated 21/01/10 stating that £167 is now due. Lastly, a letter from Graham White, Solicitors, threatening County Court action with total additional costs of £207.25. Should I carry on ignoring this stuff or should I now seek legal advice? Thanks Taffchap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lastly, a letter from Graham White, Solicitors, threatening County Court action with total additional costs of £207.25. Should I carry on ignoring this stuff or should I now seek legal advice?
The key word here is 'threatening', the only time you'll need further legal advice is when they actually issue a claim, which has a 0.00001% of ever happening. Continue to ignore.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update as this company seems to be causing other people issues.

 

I received a good 4-5 letters from various entities telling me that they had kindly doubled the "fine" each time to cover their legal costs and admin costs etc and that I would soon be in court with the judge no doubt awarding them all the fines and some extra costs.

 

Happily after completely ignoring every single one they haven't been in touch since and I havent heard from them in many months now.

 

Treat the scumbags with the contempt they deserve and simply ignore their BS attempts to extort money from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've just received my letter from Graham White solicitors demanding £207.25 and threatening what will happen. I still haven't replied and have no intention of doing so.

 

I had the debt collection letter around 4 weeks ago.

 

Hopefully they should get bored with me soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just to finish off this story, I wrote to Sir Terry Leahy, the Chief Executive of Tesco, and had a nice personal reply saying the action had been stopped and he added an apology. He didn't say anything about their use of Central Ticketing though! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just read all the comments relating to central ticketing......my daughter was parked up in a disabled bay y.day and had her clock set correctly, the clock was set at 12.30pm which meant she had until 3.30pm to return to her car, the ticket was issued at 1.13pm stating reason 0022, to which i dont know what this is, the fine is for £100.. but if paid within 14 days it goes down to £65.00, i have looked on their website on their is nothing on there so say what their codes are, my daughter is only 19yrs old and is absolutly gutted over this ticket as she does not have that kind of money.....:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...