Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You need to choose between ET and small claims, you cannot do both. For straightforward wages I'd go small claims. Faster and less messing about. Advice here Employment claims in the civil courts - Working Families WORKINGFAMILIES.ORG.UK Some types of employment-related claims can be brought in the civil courts, rather than in an Employment Tribunal. This advice page offers a high level...  
    • The garages are used - just car currently being fixed.  I have no need of what they offer.  It is conscious trespass - and the law allows. Which is frustrating.  It's just v annoying that they do this. Isn't there a law that someone cannot prevent access to a public highway from private land?
    • The problem with sending it too early is that Jake might try to write something called a Supplemental Witness Statement to undermine yours.  It would be better to send yours right on the court's deadline. The problem is that we don't know when that is.  In 90% of cases it's 14 days before the court's deadline, so 21/06.  However, in the odd case the judge decides differently.  
    • Signs and notes on windscreens wouldn't deter me either. after all. it's private land and very little deterrent to stop drivers from abusing it. A physical barrier, IMHO is the only way you will stop them abusing it.....or, depending on what businesses they are, why not rent out your garage to them, ask them for a staff discount if you purchase anything from them? Whilst it is irksome, how much money have you got to throw at it, and is it really that important in your life? If you were using your garage, different story.
    • Still worried about time order - they have not followed procedures. Looking through lists there are some items not been sent, incorrect leaflets sent.  emails sent and we’ve not received. Texts and emails sent and not completed process. Pages worth.  The worst thing is the phone calls. Not got more than 8 minutes of most.  it’s so unfair.  Have sent them emails offering to pay right back to March. All arrears were paid back.  2 payments since.    what other info do you require from me ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Southern Rail taking me to court!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

Back in October, I was on my way into work as normal. Slightly rushed.

 

Hopped onto the train as normal, and as I was almost at London Bridge, an Revenue Protection person came around. I reached into my back pocket where I always keep my rail pass. Unfortunately, my hand came out with some old tickets from the weekend. Was in such a rush in the morning that I forgot that I swapped trousers. My pass was in the other pair :(

 

Anway, I explained this to the lady and she issued me with a Witness Statement thing and said I had 14 days to send them a copy of Rail pass. She asked if I was avoiding the fair. I said no, I already had a pass, but forgot it, and anyway, to get out at my stop I was intending to use a credit card to purchase a ticket to get again.

 

This is where problem one occurs. I signed the form, I only gave it a cursory glance. Stupidly I was expecting her to write down the correct information. On it, it says I was trying to avoid paying the fair. She also never said I could bring it up with the Independant Fine people (or whatever they are called! :) )

 

By the end of the week, I had sent a copy of my rail pass off to their offices in Croydon, to the address I was given. Second problem, I didn't send it registered.

 

I never heard anything again, so thought all was good. I went on vacation and on my return I moved out of my mums house to a flat elsewhere.

 

A week and a bit ago, I went back home to see her and there was a brown envelope. I was being summoned to court and asked to pay £105. This was news to me. I called them up, and they said that they sent me a letter before the summons. I cant remember what it was supposed to have contained, but suffice to say, it never turned up. I asked if they received my letter and they said they didn't.

 

I am being given the option of pleading guilty and not being there, pleading guilty and appearing, or pleading not guilty. The evidence they have against me is circumstantial, admittedly I was stupid to not read properly, but I assumed that what I was telling the woman was being copied down faithfully.

 

I have been taking that train for over two years now, I have a full time job and have never tried to avoid paying a fair!! It is so irritating.

Sorry for the essay.

 

Any ideas on what I should do? Help please!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and sorry it's taken so long for you to get a reply.

 

Common sense would dictate that you at least have 'mitigating circumstances' but we all know how far common sense goes in a court room.

 

My reply will bump you up to the top of the forum, so hopefully someone who can really help will be along soon.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will have to plead not guilty and go to court with your pass that you forgot and explain all the circumstances. they cant fine you avoiding payment if you have already payed for a pass! or send a copy to them again, this time registered or fax email a copy to save time. No point in them continuing if they will not get anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd advise going to court and showing them the letter you sent and your pass, they really do take liberties sometimes, I know somebody who refused to sign the form as there was nothing written on it, they were told 'I'll fill it in later' they replied 'I'll sign it later'. The police were called and when they turned up they had located their missing pass, shown it to them and asked for the revenue protection person to be reminded of the CORRECT law in signing blank witness statements. Needless to say this didn't make the papers as it could have caused a stir.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe they have to prove you had the intention of avoiding payment. Which you clearly didnt.

Which byelaw are you being summonsed under?

 

I would strongly advise you to send a letter via recorded delivery, stating you forgot your pass.

You did not try to avoid the fare

As requested you sent your valid pass to the relevant people

You did not recieve the last letter from them.

The inspector did not accurately write the statement, correct it.

Offer to pay the £20 penalty fair.

Why did you sign something you didnt read??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Failing to produce ticket or pay fare on request

STARTING POINT Band A fine

RANGE Conditional discharge to band

B fine

 

you would also recieve a criminal record,i would try and sort it out of court and put it down to experience,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I believe they have to prove you had the intention of avoiding payment. Which you clearly didnt.

Which byelaw are you being summonsed under?

 

I would strongly advise you to send a letter via recorded delivery, stating you forgot your pass.

You did not try to avoid the fare

As requested you sent your valid pass to the relevant people

You did not recieve the last letter from them.

The inspector did not accurately write the statement, correct it.

Offer to pay the £20 penalty fair.

Why did you sign something you didnt read??

 

I know that this information is obviously given in good faith by Daniel9878, but the key point is wrong.

 

Depending on what you are being charged with, they do NOT need to prove you had the intention of avoiding the fare.

 

If you have been charged with avoiding the fare, that is exactly what it will say on the summons. That will be an offence under the Regulation of Railways Act and in that case they do have to prove the intention was not to pay.

 

If you have been charged with a byelaw offence that is different. The offence is of failing to carry a ticket under the rules in force. Unfortunately they do not need to prove you intended to avoid the fare. All they have to do is show that you were there and did not show a valid ticket when you were checked in line with the rules.

 

If you still have the actual pass you could plead not guilty and go to the court hoping they would see your viewpoint, but that would not stop the court finding you guilty of the offence. They might impose a conditional discharge and no costs, but I would not bet on it.

 

The good advice that you have been given is to try to sort it out of court.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I do have to say you were extemely foolish to sign what amounts to a written confession without reading it.

To be fair, you're not the first person to have dones this and you won't be the last.

The RPI (or equivalent) who questioned you was trained to ask certain questions, if you allow yourself to be 'guided' along this route then sign the record as a true statement at the time, then it is highly likely you will be considered for prosection and succesfully prosecuted.

You MUST go to court, not waffle and produce as much relevant information as possible otherwise that signature will damn you, its your only chance frankly.

 

You may have had no intention of avoiding payment (and I believe that as you had a valid railcard at home) BUT you signed a document saying it WAS your intention of avoiding payment by not carrying it!

 

However as old-codja (excellent advice as always -an ex-rpi I shouldnt wonder?) has pointed out they do not need to even prove this they are simply prosecuting you under 'not producing a valid ticket', a lesser offence if this has any comfort.

 

Im my experience (ex RPI-M FGW) you are going to have to be frightfully lucky to have all charges dropped but they will almost certainly be lesser if you attend and argue your case effectively, this all depends on how much you are paid normally -ie how much taking the day off work will cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...