Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
    • Thank you I cannot sleep. CRS is the company 
    • They wont take you to court. I'm not sure what they'll do about the letters and if they will or wont send you the letters from their retail prevention company, but you can ignore those letters. You'll be just fine don't worry.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA/Restons claimform - old A+L Card **WON+COSTS**


fairbyblue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You lose and they get Judgement.,Then the question of payment ,lump sum or you submit an I&E and the DJ will order you to pay monthly what he feels is appropiate.That is he stark reality FB.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

REstons (Bouchier) phoned without prejudice and said did i want to settle this amicably !!!!. I said i was until you got involved. he wanted me to make an offer, i said i already had but you dismissed it and ploughed onto issueing the 2nd DN. He did really quite grasp the concept that they did not have the paperwork correct. And he still believes he can issue a further DN (The third one after having a letter from restons confirming termination)

 

I asked for a notice of discontinuence, the balance to remedy at the time of 1st default (£1601.39 instead of 11k)which is all they could cliam for.

Removal of default notices from credit file and £500 cheque for costs (not off the balance but a cheque) and I would pay them £12 per month off £1601.39

 

He is getting in touch with MBNA.

 

He doesnt think they will go with that.

 

oh hang on He just sent email

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE SAVE AS TO COSTS

 

In line with our recent telephone conversation the terms of settlement ARE:-

 

(i) The Bank files a Notice of Discontinuance in respect of this claim;

(ii) The Bank will pay you the sum of £500.00 in full and final settlement of any claim for costs you have arising out of this action.

(iii) You repay the outstanding balance under the credit agreement of £11,214.35 by monthly instalments of £12.00. The first instalment to be received hereby 31st August 2009. The rate of repayment to be annually reviewed with an expectation that it should increase should your financial circumstances improve.

(iv) If you fail to pay a monthly instalment of £12.00 or any subsequently agreed increase then our client reserves its rights under the credit agreement to take any action it thinks fit.

 

Please confirm you accept these terms.

 

As soon as we receive your confirmation we will file the Notice of Discontinuance and send a copy to you.

 

I think thats a win (note section iv, they aint got one)

 

Well im happy and in the circumstances I think I'm £500 better off

 

Thanks to everyone on here for the advice and assistance especially robcag,supasnooper, CCm,PF PT and loads more.

Once cheque clears i will make the appropriate donation.

 

Guess where I'm going to? Thats right, the pub.:D:D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FB!

 

Not sure about this bit...

 

(iii) You repay the outstanding balance under the credit agreement of £11,214.35 by monthly instalments of £12.00. The first instalment to be received hereby 31st August 2009. The rate of repayment to be annually reviewed with an expectation that it should increase should your financial circumstances improve.

 

Looks like the deal is you pay them £11k at £12 a Month, then they will start to hassle you to death the moment they can to get the £12 raised.

 

Or am I missing something?

 

Doesn't look like a very good deal.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FB!

 

Not sure about this bit...

 

 

 

Looks like the deal is you pay them £11k at £12 a Month, then they will start to hassle you to death the moment they can to get the £12 raised.

 

Or am I missing something?

 

Doesn't look like a very good deal.

 

Cheers,

BRW

 

The way im thinking is that it will be next year, before they can do anything, at that point if they want to try to get more then the process starts again and i know what paper work they have and if they want to play silly buggers they can, cos im more prepared. I'd like them to try and serve me a default notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FB!

 

Tread carefully, because I fear this is, in effect, getting you to agree that you owe £11.2k.

 

I would ask for help from the Site Team, x20, PT2537 or Andyorch etc ASAP before accepting this.

 

IOW, if you agree to this, that may be taken that you agree you owe the £11.2k alleged Debt. It could be a very unwise move to accept.

 

Suggest you don't go for it until others have commented.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FB!

 

Tread carefully, because I fear this is, in effect, getting you to agree that you owe £11.2k.

 

I would ask for help from the Site Team, x20, PT2537 or Andyorch etc ASAP before accepting this.

 

IOW, if you agree to this, that may be taken that you agree you owe the £11.2k alleged Debt. It could be a very unwise move to accept.

 

Suggest you don't go for it until others have commented.

 

Cheers,

BRW

 

OK will do

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with BRW - good as far as it goes but I don't like the power they have given themselves nor the fact that you are agreeing you owe them £11k.

 

The question is, how much do they not want to go to court? What have you got on them or what will they lose or what will it cost them?

 

Well done for sticking with it though.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it does say

You repay the outstanding balance under the credit agreement of £11,214.35 by monthly instalments of £12.00. The first instalment to be received hereby 31st August 2009. The rate of repayment to be annually reviewed with an expectation that it should increase should your financial circumstances improve.

 

Trust me it wont and then its back to court if they say it will

 

And we be back at square 1, next year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

REstons (Bouchier) phoned without prejudice and said did i want to settle this amicably !!!!. I said i was until you got involved. he wanted me to make an offer, i said i already had but you dismissed it and ploughed onto issueing the 2nd DN. He did really quite grasp the concept that they did not have the paperwork correct. And he still believes he can issue a further DN (The third one after having a letter from restons confirming termination)

 

I asked for a notice of discontinuence, the balance to remedy at the time of 1st default (£1601.39 instead of 11k)which is all they could cliam for.

Removal of default notices from credit file and £500 cheque for costs (not off the balance but a cheque) and I would pay them £12 per month off £1601.39

 

He is getting in touch with MBNA.

 

He doesnt think they will go with that.

 

oh hang on He just sent email

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE SAVE AS TO COSTS

 

In line with our recent telephone conversation the terms of settlement ARE:-

 

(i) The Bank files a Notice of Discontinuance in respect of this claim;

(ii) The Bank will pay you the sum of £500.00 in full and final settlement of any claim for costs you have arising out of this action.

(iii) You repay the outstanding balance under the credit agreement of £11,214.35 by monthly instalments of £12.00. The first instalment to be received hereby 31st August 2009. The rate of repayment to be annually reviewed with an expectation that it should increase should your financial circumstances improve.

(iv) If you fail to pay a monthly instalment of £12.00 or any subsequently agreed increase then our client reserves its rights under the credit agreement to take any action it thinks fit.

 

Please confirm you accept these terms.

 

As soon as we receive your confirmation we will file the Notice of Discontinuance and send a copy to you.

 

I think thats a win (note section iv, they aint got one)

 

Well im happy and in the circumstances I think I'm £500 better off

 

Thanks to everyone on here for the advice and assistance especially robcag,supasnooper, CCm,PF PT and loads more.

Once cheque clears i will make the appropriate donation.

 

Guess where I'm going to? Thats right, the pub.:D:D:D:D

 

no offence but you must be totally nuts if you think this is a good result

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FB!

 

Maybe write back and suggest they have made a typing mistake, Section (iii) should read like this:

 

(iii) You repay the a final sum of £1,601.39 by monthly instalments of £12.00. The first instalment to be received by 31st August 2009.

 

That is what I'd do.

 

Trust me it wont and then its back to court if they say it will

 

And we be back at square 1, next year.

 

The trouble is, you could be going back to Court and with them armed with an Agreement made in August 2009 saying you agreed to pay them £11.2k.

 

Bearing in mind the Judge Lottery, that could be a disaster.

 

Sorry to labour this, just don't want to see you end up in a bad position, that only becomes apparent later. You can bet they will do all they can to make you miss a payment, to then use that as an excuse to go for the full amount of £11.2k.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

it does say

You repay the outstanding balance under the credit agreement of £11,214.35 by monthly instalments of £12.00. The first instalment to be received hereby 31st August 2009. The rate of repayment to be annually reviewed with an expectation that it should increase should your financial circumstances improve.

 

Trust me it wont and then its back to court if they say it will

 

And we be back at square 1, next year.

 

but you will have admitted the whole debt and you will have no room to challenge it

 

11,000 at 12 per month will take 76 years

 

they will sit on it for a year and then if you dont make an offer to clear it in say 10 years or less they will accept your offer at the time but ask for (and get) a charging order on the basis of the length of time you will be repaying

 

after that they will wait a while longer and then apply for a sale

 

i would strongly advise you to forego the 500 quid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FB!

 

Maybe write back and suggest they have made a typing mistake, Section (iii) should read like this:

 

 

 

That is what I'd do.

 

 

 

The trouble is, you could be going back to Court and with them armed with an Agreement made in August 2009 saying you agreed to pay them £11.2k.

 

Bearing in mind the Judge Lottery, that could be a disaster.

 

Sorry to labour this, just don't want to see you end up in a bad position, that only becomes apparent later. You can bet they will do all they can to make you miss a payment, to then use that as an excuse to go for the full amount of £11.2k.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Is that not without prejudice he cant bring it up in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the email i sent to restons

 

Dear Mr Bouchier

Further to the offer i now refuse it and point out that the amount outstanding is £1601.39. Otherwise I will see you in court on Friday

I will accept if you change part iii to

(iii) You repay the outstanding balance under the credit agreement of £1601.39 by monthly instalments of £12.00. The first instalment to be received hereby 31st August 2009. The rate of repayment to be annually reviewed with an expectation that it should increase should your financial circumstances improve

 

Please respond

ASAP

Link to post
Share on other sites

yup does not look a good deal u will still be indebted to them 4 at least 25 yrs and if u inadvertantly miss a payment they will be down on u like a ton of bricks

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FB!

 

If my maths is on the ball, the above agreement means you will have them hanging around your neck for the next 77.8 Years, paying them £12 a Month.

 

It'll never be Statute Barred, you will always owe them a fairly large balance, and at any stage you miss a £12 payment, they will be jumping in straight away.

 

Is that not without prejudice he cant bring it up in court?

 

I think he means WITHOUT PREJUDICE at this stage only, i.e. they are hiding behind this while making the proposal.

 

They'll not hide behind this if you agree, they'll send you an OPEN LETTER to confirm the arrangements. That's what they want, and that's what will be used to nail you.

 

I read the email as being a bit of a piddle take on the part of Restons.

 

See my above amended Section (iii), that would be OK. But not the £11.2k figure. The more I think about it, the more I don't think it would be wise to accept that as stated.

 

Push for them to change Section (iii), and then it would be more like a reasonable result I think. That will still take you 11 years to pay it off, but that isn't so bad, and provided you make sure every £12 payment goes out without fail, then it'll be over after 11 years...or you could pay them off via a final lump sum when you can afford it to get them off your back for good.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...