Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
    • It’s all with current lenders and no missed payment to date. so with any reduced payment to them it’s likely to be going to debt collectors at some stage. we jointly own a property together me and my partner 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE Money - looking for compensation from them


Danny54
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5674 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My mother who is 81 and who has never done a dishonest thing in her life, has recently been put under a lot of worry and stress from a stupid company called GE money for something she never did and now she's received an apology letter from them. My question is about getting compensation from them.

 

My mother took out a store card with Debenhams a few weeks ago. She never received the card. She later received a letter from GE Money asking for payment of about £12 for allegedly mail ordering clothes to be sent to some address in romford of which she has no clue about. She ended up receiving threatening letters with threats of collection agencies, and she received daily robot calls asking for the money. The debt was increasing all this time with interest being added. Trying to phone them and speak to a person is difficult enough, not to mention they're 0871 numbers at 10p a minute!

 

Last wednesday I rang them and finally got to speak to a woman. I insisted they were at fault and that they need to stop these robot calls and threat letters immediately. She said she would cancel the letters and robot calls. Finally the robot calls stopped and today my mother received an apology letter. However, the letter is weak, unsigned and doesn't in our opinion appease the situation to any satisfaction. There has never been any explanation from them as to why they made such a massive cock up. It's cost my mother a few quid in phonecalls @ 10p per minute plus unnecessary aggravation and harassment.

 

GE Money are not taking enough responsibility for their actions and imo, this amounts to the business equivalent of manslaughter, because they could very easily have put my mother in hospital due to the stress they caused her for something she never did. GE money should be compensating her for this and I intend to write to them with a copy of their apology letter asking for this. I also think Debenhams head office should receive a copy of the letters. I only have a PO box address in Leeds for GE Money customer service, but would prefer an email address. Could you please advise me based on what I've said here and does anyone know of an email address for GE Money? I think something in the region of £100 compensation is not unreasonable to ask for. What do you think? Thanks.

Edited by Danny54
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any formula for working out why £100 should be sufficient compensation, or is it just a sum of money that would come in handy for christmas?

 

Assuming your mother is still very much alive, I think going down the corporate manslaughter route may be prone of a very significant flaw in your argument.

 

Compensation does not get based on what might have happened, but what did actually happen, which appears to be a few quid in phone calls.

 

I would be more interested in how an 81 year old managed to get the store card in the first place, bearing in mind the problems the rest of the population is having in getting credit.

 

Regardless of this, it sounds like you won't be happy until you've got someone's head on a plate so all I can say is 'good luck'. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any formula for working out why £100 should be sufficient compensation, or is it just a sum of money that would come in handy for christmas?

 

Assuming your mother is still very much alive, I think going down the corporate manslaughter route may be prone of a very significant flaw in your argument.

 

Compensation does not get based on what might have happened, but what did actually happen, which appears to be a few quid in phone calls.

 

I would be more interested in how an 81 year old managed to get the store card in the first place, bearing in mind the problems the rest of the population is having in getting credit.

 

Regardless of this, it sounds like you won't be happy until you've got someone's head on a plate so all I can say is 'good luck'. :rolleyes:

 

What an absolutely pathetic response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GE Money are not taking enough responsibility for their actions and imo, this amounts to the business equivalent of manslaughter, ..

What do you think?

 

You got a reply, a quite reasonable one but you think it's a pathetic one. Fair enough but I can't see too many other people rushing to suggest things for you (IMO).

 

HTH

Link to post
Share on other sites

GE Money are not taking enough responsibility for their actions and imo, this amounts to the business equivalent of manslaughter, ..

What do you think?

 

You got a reply, a quite reasonable one but you think it's a pathetic one. Fair enough but I can't see too many other people rushing to suggest things for you (IMO).

 

HTH

 

I asked for advice and got a sarcastic, eyerolling reply. If you think that's helpful you need your head testing. I'm already getting good replies on other forums, so don't waste your time on my thread anymore, this place is ****ing rubbish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like the OP won't be reading this but unless the detail has been reduced for brevity it sounds like GE issued card, card was intercepted or account taken over and fraud was commited.

 

Last Wednesday, some 5 days ago, GE were contacted for the first time (unless a letter/other contact was made). In that time they have identified it was fraud and presumably written off the debt.

 

If that is a reasonable summary I can't see what GE have done wrong, if they have been told repeatedly and ignored such communications then yes they have failed.

 

Then again perhaps I just need my head testing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Danny, I think you are incredibly rude, you have received unemotional, reasonable advice, you can ask for your costs to be reimbursed, you could also check to make sure that your mothers credit report is unaffected and this costs £2 to order, if it took a week to sort then the credit company have been brilliant. I think you owe Ron an apology.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well was it a reasonable summary ? Was the first time GE became aware the activity was fraudulent was Wednesday 12th November ?

 

You do mention the cost of a few pound in calls at 10p per minute. Were these calls every connected and what was the outcome of those calls ?

 

If you have phoned, emailed, written numerous times and GE just didn't bother to acknowledge the fraud then fair enough, fill your boots and stick a request in covering all expended time (charge them your currently hourly rate at work for 15-30 mins per letter/email), costs (stamps, envelopes, phone calls ideally from an itemised bill) etc SINCE the first contact was made advising them of the fraud.

 

I don't work for GE but then again I don't agree some phone calls are the equivalent of corporate manslaughter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of figured that would be the reply I'd get. Perhaps I'm also liable to pay you compensation for the stress and inconvenience you must have suffered by me not telling you what you want to hear?

 

Get real man ffs.

 

I was looking for advice on getting compensation. Your reply was completely negative and sarcastic. Not helpful. Don't kid yourself that you did me any favours.

 

 

Danny, I think you are incredibly rude, you have received unemotional, reasonable advice, you can ask for your costs to be reimbursed, you could also check to make sure that your mothers credit report is unaffected and this costs £2 to order, if it took a week to sort then the credit company have been brilliant. I think you owe Ron an apology.

 

I do not owe ron an apology. I was rude because he was rude. The credit company is not brilliant. Wherr do you people get this stuff from?

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL !!!:lol:

 

Why was my original reply rude? It was a little tongue in cheek maybe, but this is known as 'irony' in the face of the rather over the top tone of the original post.

 

You state that you were looking for advice about compensation. I gave you some advice.

 

"Compensation does not get based on what might have happened, but what did actually happen, which appears to be a few quid in phone calls."

 

Another poster has also twigged exactly what has really happened here - your mothers new card was intercepted and used fraudulently. As soon as the situation was established GE appeared to resolve the issue. God knows why you think they are liable to your mother for any further compensation - she has not suffered a demonstrable loss, apart from a couple of phone calls.

 

Anyway, I've made my point. As I said before......Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you know what danny, if you dont like the advice given then you don t have to come here, I apologise for this site and most of its members not being part of the vexatious litigants/compensation culture, but if you have found somewhere else that is, and you prefer their advice, then my advice would be to go and talk to them!

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any formula for working out why £100 should be sufficient compensation, or is it just a sum of money that would come in handy for christmas?

 

That was sarcastic and totally uncalled for.

 

Assuming your mother is still very much alive, I think going down the corporate manslaughter route may be prone of a very significant flaw in your argument.

 

Compensation does not get based on what might have happened, but what did actually happen, which appears to be a few quid in phone calls.

 

I would be more interested in how an 81 year old managed to get the store card in the first place, bearing in mind the problems the rest of the population is having in getting credit.

 

I'd say it is none of your business! There are many 81 year olds who have more disposable money than say a 31 year old single mum of 3 who also has a store card.

 

Regardless of this, it sounds like you won't be happy until you've got someone's head on a plate so all I can say is 'good luck'. :rolleyes:

 

I think it is disgusting that a very elderly lady was treated in such a shabby way by GE Money and so quickly without obviously finding out the correct facts.

 

This lady is from a generation who in the large part would never get into debt but would save and pay their way by putting aside money in empty jars.

 

She was very clearly distressed and for no reason.

 

Don't know if £100 is the correct sum for causing this distress but GE Money should send a bunch of flowers and a proper apology rather than just a meaningless unsigned letter that is not sincere.

 

 

 

 

There was no reason to be so harsh to the person posting this worried about there elderly mum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bejeesus - here we go again.

 

My point about an 81 year old being granted credit was not a jibe at the OP or his mother, but rather a suggestion that he takes this up with GE in an age where lenders are supposed to be lending responsibly.

 

Is that OK Mr O'Sullivan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be more interested in how an 81 year old managed to get the store card in the first place, bearing in mind the problems the rest of the population is having in getting credit.

 

I'd say it is none of your business! There are many 81 year olds who have more disposable money than say a 31 year old single mum of 3 who also has a store card.

 

None of this is our business but the OP did decide to post on the board.

 

 

Regardless of this, it sounds like you won't be happy until you've got someone's head on a plate so all I can say is 'good luck'. :rolleyes:

 

I think it is disgusting that a very elderly lady was treated in such a shabby way by GE Money and so quickly without obviously finding out the correct facts.

 

I'd suggest you don't know the facts as the OP hasn't clarified what took place and this would then allow an informed decision as to whether GE screwed up. At the minute it looks like they were chasing a legitimate debt. Whether those are tactics people approve of is a different question.

 

 

This lady is from a generation who in the large part would never get into debt but would save and pay their way by putting aside money in empty jars.

 

Good generalisation. However, a store card was taken out. Again the more reasonable line of complaint may well be mis-selling

 

She was very clearly distressed and for no reason.

 

There was a reason, it looks like fraud was committed which is distressing.

 

Don't know if £100 is the correct sum for causing this distress but GE Money should send a bunch of flowers and a proper apology rather than just a meaningless unsigned letter that is not sincere.

 

Did GE cause the distress ? It appears they resolved the fraud (from the customers point of view) very quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont rise to it Ron :-)

 

I have to say, which is why I first posted that some members on here are a jolly unfriendly lot. I experienced this when I first joined.

 

The members mum was clearly distressed, as would my elderly mum, and it is appropriate she be compensated for that, even if its a bunch of flowers.

 

All she has received is an unsigned letter that is not sincere.

 

Thats all the member was concerned about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are ways and means of asking for advice, also of disputing advice. Some people have been here for quite a while and have seen quite a bit

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bejeesus - here we go again.

 

My point about an 81 year old being granted credit was not a jibe at the OP or his mother, but rather a suggestion that he takes this up with GE in an age where lenders are supposed to be lending responsibly.

 

Is that OK Mr O'Sullivan?

 

Not really, no Ronald. The fact an 81 year old lady has a store card is not relevant to what the op has posted.

 

He is concerned his mum was distressed which any son would be unhappy with because GE Money got heavy handed without first checking the facts.

 

As far as I'm aware causing distress is a valid compensation claim and I think that is what GE did.

 

This site is full of the tatics of these big institutions and rightly condemned yet this poster has been subjected to some quite nasty replies.

 

There is without doubt some very unpleasant members on this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are ways and means of asking for advice, also of disputing advice. Some people have been here for quite a while and have seen quite a bit

 

Yes Lulu, I appreciate that. But my mum is elderly too and I know that something like this happening to her would horrify her and distress her too.

 

Why are people not condemning this big institution and their behaviour in being so heavy handed instead of the member?:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

All she has received is an unsigned letter that is not sincere.

 

Thats all the member was concerned about. .

 

Hate to disagree with you here but I think the OP was just after cash compensation (which a company would never pay they would pay an ex gratia payment as a gesture of goodwill). Maybe I misread the original post but perhaps not after some of the later posts.

 

If the OP had requested advice in wording a suitable letter they may well have got a different response.

 

Asking for an email address also suggests the OP was after the easiest way of contacting GE not raising a genuine complaint with GE.

 

Again only just my opinion. I'm more than happy when large intransigent firms are held to account but there is a way of doing it and people on this site do have the knowledge if it is asked for in the right way/spirit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, no Ronald. The fact an 81 year old lady has a store card is not relevant to what the op has posted.

 

He is concerned his mum was distressed which any son would be unhappy with because GE Money got heavy handed without first checking the facts.

 

As far as I'm aware causing distress is a valid compensation claim and I think that is what GE did.

 

This site is full of the tatics of these big institutions and rightly condemned yet this poster has been subjected to some quite nasty replies.

 

There is without doubt some very unpleasant members on this site.

You have again completely misunderstood the nature of my comment - I was suggesting to the OP that he question GE about their lending policies (which indirectly led to this stressful situation in the first place).

 

I also happen to agree with OoopNorth, the OP's tone in his original post made him appear that he was simply baying for blood over what still appears to be a minor misendeamour. And then to describe them as culpable to manslaughter just went from the sublime to the ridiculous.

 

There is room on this forum for healthy debate, disagreements and - dare I say it - even humour (assuming some people would just lighten up). It seems that on this thread the only nasty comments have come from the OP and you, Mr O'sullivan.

 

There is really no need to resort to calling me unpleasant - I don't think that is deserved based on what I have posted, nor based on the pretty decent advice I have given people since joinging this site over a year ago.

 

In the words of your namesake....."You never listen to reason" but "What can I do?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well GEmoney wont lend to me (just tried) so their policies seem pretty sound to me

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...