Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charge for DD non payment.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a caravan insured with a company called Park Home Insurance Services Ltd.

I pay the premium monthly to a company called Close Premium Finance.

Unfortunately I had to cancel Octobers DD to stop me going overdrawn and today I received a letter from Close Premium Finance advising me they had not received the October payment and charging me £30 administration expenses. They are saying I must pay this on top of the monthly payment to continue my insurance.

They quote section 87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974.

Have they a right to demand this £30 charge or is it another rip off worth fighting?

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That just goes to show that it didn't cost £30 in admin costs as they are not going to lose money. It shows that these companies just pick a figure out of the air that they think they can get away with.

 

Can't you pay direct to Park Home instead of going through this broker?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't have a scanner so will type what they say.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Re: Insurance premium - Close Premium Finance Acc No: *******

 

We are writing in relation to an overdue payment on the above agreement.

Your bank have returnrd your direct debit unpaid with the reason ' Instruction cancelled by Payer'.

You are therefore in arrears and have until 20 October 2008 to pay the sum of £70.55.

This includes a charge of £30.00 to cover our administrative expenses.

As your account falls within section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, we are obliged to send the Notice of Default attached.

 

I then have a notice of default as follows:-

 

We are writing in relation to your obligations under clause 3 of the Agreement dated 28 February 2008 to make minimum monthly payments to Close Brothers Limited in order to repay ammounts outstanding under the Agreement. We have not received your payment for 02 October 2008. This is now overdue and your failure to pay is in breach of the Agreement.

 

You have until 20 October 2008 to remedy this breach by the payment of all sums due and owing to Close Brothers Limited under the Agreement at that date, which will be £70.55. This includes a charge of £30.00 to cover our administration expenses.

 

IF THE ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE IS TAKEN BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN NO FURTHER ENFORCEMENT ACTION WILL BE TAKEN IN RESPECT OF THE BREACH.

 

IF YOU DO NOT TAKE THE ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN THEN THE FURTHER ACTION SET OUT BELOW MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST YOU.

 

This Notice is served under section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the ACT), in relation to a Close Premium Finance running account credit agreement between Close Brothers Limited and yourself dated 28 February 2008 ( the Agreement).

 

We will terminate the Agreement and demand early payment of the balance on the account. We may enforce our security by cancelling your insurance policy as set out in the attached schedule, and applying any refund of the premium in satisfaction of your obligations under the Agreement.

You will remain liable for any shortfall on your account.

 

 

 

It then goes on to tell me to get advice if I'm not sure what to do.

Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a similar letter from them the other day (see nasty default notice) all be it for van insurance, they seem to be some sort of middle man company, and seem to be a bit of a bully. This is a copy of the reply I sent them, a bit over the top perhaps but I have learned to strike whilst I'm still angry and worry about what happens at a later date, if it happens.

 

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing in reply to your ridiculous and over the top letter dated 7/10/08. I will explain the situation; I was in the process of changing banks over when my direct debit to you became due and I missed the payment date, however all my other payments to you have been on time and I believe this was the last one due for the policy. I would have thought that a simple reminder letter would have been more appropriate in the circumstances. I see your letter as a way to make a couple of extra pounds on the deal as I may renew elsewhere next year.

Well after your letter I definitely will be taking my business elsewhere next year and will be telling Quickfit the reason why. Furthermore I do not recognise your charge of £20 for what is no more than a letter reasonable, as statute law states that only reasonable costs and charges can be made in such circumstances. I also do not recognise the extra £5 for non direct debit charge to be valid either, therefore I am enclosing a cheque for the final amount of £31.76 and trust this will be the end of the matter. If you wish to pursue your spurious charges further I suggest the place is the county court and anymore threatening letters from you will be considered harassment and reported to the relevant authorities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Borrowed" Courtesy of Scarlet Pimpernel - his reply to a recent thread:

 

"This is covered under the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection, which states that the only fees that can be charged are those for which:

 

- there is specific contractual provision for such fees

- the contract states the amount of any such fees

- fees are based upon actual and necessary costs

 

I have yet to see any fee that a DCA has tried to add to a debt that meets these criteria. In addition, it may well be that this action is contrary to CPUTR 2008."

 

Followed by his letter:

 

 

Quote:

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter of (date).

 

Your attention is drawn to the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection, which is clear that any such fee must meet specific criteria. I therefore require you to provide evidence that your 'administration fee' meets the criteria.

 

I suggest that the best way for this to be achieved is by way of an original credit agreement, and you should treat this letter as a formal request pursuant to s. 77/78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00 which represents the statutory fee, and which is not to be used for any other purpose. You have 12 working days to comply.

 

Yours etc.

 

tom a

 

 

The only mention I can see for DN's refer to missing payments (plural).

 

I don't think they are allowed to issue after such a short period of arrears.

 

The DN sounds dodgy as well.There are set terms.

Does it begin:

 

IMPORTANT-YOU SHOULD READ THIS CAREFULLY

 

p.s. I would send October's payment with your extra pound.

Edited by TheChancellor
ps added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent them an email yesterday asking if the charge was for administration or Default notice.

Got this reply today.

 

"Thank you for your e-mail. I can confirm it is an administration charge as your account has defaulted.

 

Please note I will not remove any further fees from your account.

 

Kind regards"

 

Very abrupt it seems to me.

The only thing I'm concerned about is if I cause any trouble they may cancel my insurance.

What do you think?

Edited by tom a
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dug my agreement out and October was my last payment.

They can whistle for the charge fee.

Thinking of sending them a letter with my final payment along the lines of oscar21 (post 7).

What do you think?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dug my agreement out and October was my last payment.

They can whistle for the charge fee.

Thinking of sending them a letter with my final payment along the lines of oscar21 (post 7).

What do you think?

Thanks

 

Well that makes life much simpler.When they ever get a tea-girl with any brains they might stop flying of the handle & not lose so many customers.

 

 

Never mind Oscar21.Personally I'd tell them to "Foxtrot Oscar" & save the ink.:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...