Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Years of charges to claim back


MortgageMan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been with Lloyds for years I have had serveral accounts and been charged thousands of pounds for various items such as returned cheques, letter charges, d.ds you name it I been charged it, Thanks to this site The dog is about to bite. We are working on our claim now

Trevor:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Trevor, welcome to the LTSB forum. There's lots of help here if you need it.

 

Follow the recommended procedures and be patient. You will get your due desserts eventually. :)

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have just filled in my claim on-line after recieving 2 letters from bank fobbing me of. Good-luck to you. this site gives great but different expericences and info. You must stick to the main format though the 2 letters and then concider court be patient the bank takes there time to reply. leaving it often till the 7th day. Lloyds sent me a letter saying it was there final response that is when I filled in the claim on-line at www.moneyclaim.gov.uk good-luck

 

 

 

Lloyds TSB Progess

 

first letter sent 10th June

Received reply 20th June

Second letter sent 30th June

Revieved final response 7th July

Filled in claim on line 30/07/06

Recieved Acknowledgment of service 4th August

Defence submitted 6th September

Allocation Questionnaire due back 20th Sept

Sent my Allocation Questionnaire back 10th Sept

Got there copy of Allication Questionaire 23rd Sept

Court date set for 25th Jan '07

 

 

 

Paragon Finance Progress

Sent first letter 24th August 2006

No reply so second letter sent 10th Sept 2006

Received letter back saying they are going to investigate my claim

Offer made by Paragon for full ammount plus interst! Rusult!!!

Cheque recieved *Won*

 

 

 

Any thing I write on this site is only an oppinion as I am not a solicitor or legal whizz!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome and good luck. Like jadest has said you are advised to follow the procedures in the FAQ's, so far noone has actually gone to court but I think it will happen sooner or later so be prepared for it.

If you have any questions then post them here and we will do our best to help.

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have just sent my first letter off to Lloyds requesting details of charges made on an old account which I think ran from 1996 to 2002. I have serveral accounts with lloyds and they are my main bankers. I think if I try and deal with them one account at a time or is this a mistake, The problem I see is they will jump on me over my present accounts which would cause me problems, but I am still going after my money back, I am busy moving my mortgage now so that will be one thing out the way. I was charged £300 charges today so I have written a friendly but firm letter to my manager requesting that he recredits this, If he dont it will go on my list when I start on this account. What do you think am I doing it right

Trevor

Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest I haven't got a clue whether I am doing it right just know I have been (edit) by the bank annd I will do all I can to get my money bank. follow info on this site and good luck. go for it, it is your money.

 

 

 

Lloyds TSB Progess

 

first letter sent 10th June

Received reply 20th June

Second letter sent 30th June

Revieved final response 7th July

Filled in claim on line 30/07/06

Recieved Acknowledgment of service 4th August

Defence submitted 6th September

Allocation Questionnaire due back 20th Sept

Sent my Allocation Questionnaire back 10th Sept

Got there copy of Allication Questionaire 23rd Sept

Court date set for 25th Jan '07

 

 

 

Paragon Finance Progress

Sent first letter 24th August 2006

No reply so second letter sent 10th Sept 2006

Received letter back saying they are going to investigate my claim

Offer made by Paragon for full ammount plus interst! Rusult!!!

Cheque recieved *Won*

 

 

 

Any thing I write on this site is only an oppinion as I am not a solicitor or legal whizz!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today sent Lloyds a letter requesting nearly £4000 back in charges covering 3 accounts, I now expect them to turn funny as I have an overdraft, I am still waiting for details of the charges on an old account so I have really stuck my neck out. I will keep posting as things move on

Trevor

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I am going to issuse court papers next week, Interesting chat with my bank manager who told me Lloyds have a fund for private bank customers claiming charges back but as mine is business account they will fight me, Lets see whta will happen

Trevor

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Lloyds seem to put up a fight for personal customers too... or at least they don't like to pay till the very last minute... Good luck with your claim... never give up!

 

 

 

Lloyds TSB Progess

 

first letter sent 10th June

Received reply 20th June

Second letter sent 30th June

Revieved final response 7th July

Filled in claim on line 30/07/06

Recieved Acknowledgment of service 4th August

Defence submitted 6th September

Allocation Questionnaire due back 20th Sept

Sent my Allocation Questionnaire back 10th Sept

Got there copy of Allication Questionaire 23rd Sept

Court date set for 25th Jan '07

 

 

 

Paragon Finance Progress

Sent first letter 24th August 2006

No reply so second letter sent 10th Sept 2006

Received letter back saying they are going to investigate my claim

Offer made by Paragon for full ammount plus interst! Rusult!!!

Cheque recieved *Won*

 

 

 

Any thing I write on this site is only an oppinion as I am not a solicitor or legal whizz!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have issused a claim for £4473, I have heard back from the court saying they have until the 23rd Oct to reply. As I operate a small business account with an O/D I am expecting the bank to fight. I have another account to claim on as well but will get this one finished first. I intend to donate 10% to this site when I win. I am not certain how I log the court details can some one tell me

Trevor

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got order from court for small claims court on the 25th January 2007 I called the court to ask why such a long wait. They said tit was because the jugde in Chesterfield wanted all bank claims on the same date and because he wanted that date to be after the Houses of Commons had met to make a ruling on it. Any-one know what that is about? Is there a chance we might not get our charges back?

 

SC&M have said that Lloyds usually settle in order off the court dates.

Hope your claim goes with no hitches

 

 

 

Lloyds TSB Progess

 

first letter sent 10th June

Received reply 20th June

Second letter sent 30th June

Revieved final response 7th July

Filled in claim on line 30/07/06

Recieved Acknowledgment of service 4th August

Defence submitted 6th September

Allocation Questionnaire due back 20th Sept

Sent my Allocation Questionnaire back 10th Sept

Got there copy of Allication Questionaire 23rd Sept

Court date set for 25th Jan '07

 

 

 

Paragon Finance Progress

Sent first letter 24th August 2006

No reply so second letter sent 10th Sept 2006

Received letter back saying they are going to investigate my claim

Offer made by Paragon for full ammount plus interst! Rusult!!!

Cheque recieved *Won*

 

 

 

Any thing I write on this site is only an oppinion as I am not a solicitor or legal whizz!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think that there would be no harm issuing both claims at the same time, they make you wait so long any-way... Just go for it!

Jules x

 

 

 

Lloyds TSB Progess

 

first letter sent 10th June

Received reply 20th June

Second letter sent 30th June

Revieved final response 7th July

Filled in claim on line 30/07/06

Recieved Acknowledgment of service 4th August

Defence submitted 6th September

Allocation Questionnaire due back 20th Sept

Sent my Allocation Questionnaire back 10th Sept

Got there copy of Allication Questionaire 23rd Sept

Court date set for 25th Jan '07

 

 

 

Paragon Finance Progress

Sent first letter 24th August 2006

No reply so second letter sent 10th Sept 2006

Received letter back saying they are going to investigate my claim

Offer made by Paragon for full ammount plus interst! Rusult!!!

Cheque recieved *Won*

 

 

 

Any thing I write on this site is only an oppinion as I am not a solicitor or legal whizz!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received a defence from lloyds, I will post the full defence tomorrow, I think I have made a mistake, the particulars of claim was for a personal account not a business account, do I need to apply to amended details of my claim or will it not matter, any advise please

The mortgage man

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mortgage Man

 

I think you do the same for business but leave out the bit about unfair terms in consumer regulations as that only applies to consumer contracts.

 

I think for business you use the common law principles of DunlopV New Garage

 

Hope this helps

 

Regards

 

MF5

Halifax Bank plc £1573 settled 19/6/ 06 :D

 

Abbey National PLC

Settled in full £1,754 15/9/06 :grin:

 

Halifax Credit Card £441.63 settled in full 27/10/06 :-)

 

 

Mortgage Express ERP

Pre letter 10/7/06

LBA 27/7/06

MCOL issued 6/9/06

Court Date Feb 06

Lost in court costs awarded £7,500PAYPAL [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds Filed Defence as follows:

 

XXXXXXX v Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

 

1.The Defendant,Lloyds Bank Plc (the bank) is a bank. It is admitted that the Claimant has been a cusyomer of the Bank at all material times.

 

2. By opening a business account with the Bank, the customer enters into a commercial arrangement with the Bank for the provision of banking services. At account opening a customer is provided with a Welcome Pack, which includes the Bank's charges leaflet. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract.

 

3. In the leaflet, in the section headed Unauthorised Borrowing the Bank explains that "If you overdraw on your account or exceed an overdraft limit withour prior agreement, a higher rate of interest is charged on theis unauthorised borrowing. The rate is displayed in all branches. We may cover additional work involved in monitoring your account by charging the fees detailed below.

 

Unauthorised Borrowing

We charge this when you first overdraw your account, or go above the agreed overdraft limit by £50 or more. There will be a further charge each time you increase the amount borrowed over £50 or more, unless a higher limit is agreed with us or until the account is within its existing limit or in credit. This fee will aplly, for example, if you draw against cheques which have not fully cleared and this takes you overdrawn or over an agreed limit.

£12.50 Unapid item

 

We charge each time we have to return a cheque unpaid, or cannot pay a standing order or a direct debit, because ther isn't enough money in your account.

£30 for each item not paid"

 

By a letter of June 2005, the Bank gave notice of an increase in these charges to £15 and £35 respectively.

 

4. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a request for a payment tobe made fron the Banks own funds. If the Bank makes payment, or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet and makes a charge in accordance with the terms of the contract.

 

5. There is no breach of contract; the charge cannot therefore be a penalty, consequently

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds Filed Defence as follows:

 

XXXXXXX v Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

 

1.The Defendant,Lloyds Bank Plc (the bank) is a bank. It is admitted that the Claimant has been a cusyomer of the Bank at all material times.

 

2. By opening a business account with the Bank, the customer enters into a commercial arrangement with the Bank for the provision of banking services. At account opening a customer is provided with a Welcome Pack, which includes the Bank's charges leaflet. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract.

 

3. In the leaflet, in the section headed Unauthorised Borrowing the Bank explains that "If you overdraw on your account or exceed an overdraft limit withour prior agreement, a higher rate of interest is charged on theis unauthorised borrowing. The rate is displayed in all branches. We may cover additional work involved in monitoring your account by charging the fees detailed below.

 

Unauthorised Borrowing

We charge this when you first overdraw your account, or go above the agreed overdraft limit by £50 or more. There will be a further charge each time you increase the amount borrowed over £50 or more, unless a higher limit is agreed with us or until the account is within its existing limit or in credit. This fee will aplly, for example, if you draw against cheques which have not fully cleared and this takes you overdrawn or over an agreed limit.

£12.50 Unapid item

 

We charge each time we have to return a cheque unpaid, or cannot pay a standing order or a direct debit, because ther isn't enough money in your account.

£30 for each item not paid"

 

By a letter of June 2005, the Bank gave notice of an increase in these charges to £15 and £35 respectively.

 

4. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a request for a payment tobe made fron the Banks own funds. If the Bank makes payment, or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet and makes a charge in accordance with the terms of the contract.

 

5. There is no breach of contract; the charge cannot therefore be a penalty, consequently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre-estimate of the Banks loss. It is denied that the charges are punitive or that they unduly enrich the Bank.

 

6. The customer is given advance warning of charges being imposed; customers are warned by letter when they go overdrawn or over their agreed limit without arrangement with the bank, that items will not be paid and that charges will be incurred. Statements show the charges, if any, the customer has incurred during the course of a month, and which will appear as debits on the followingmonth's statement.

 

7. It is denied that the Unfair Contract Terms Act or the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations apply to business customers who are not contracting as consumers, as required be the Act and the Regulations.

 

8. Without prejudice to the matters pleaded in paragraph 7 it is averred that the charges are fair and reasonable, and it is denied thatthey ar unlawful.

 

9. In the premises:

9.1 The charges are for banking services, and are not damages nor a penalty;

9.2 The Bank is entitled by contract to impose the charges, which are; fair and resonable.

9.3 It is denied that the charges are unlawful or contravane any statute or regulation.

 

10. The Claimants claim is denied.

 

 

Can anyone advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds Filed Defence as follows:

 

XXXXXXX v Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

 

1.The Defendant,Lloyds Bank Plc (the bank) is a bank. It is admitted that the Claimant has been a cusyomer of the Bank at all material times.

 

2. By opening a business account with the Bank, the customer enters into a commercial arrangement with the Bank for the provision of banking services. At account opening a customer is provided with a Welcome Pack, which includes the Bank's charges leaflet. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract.

 

3. In the leaflet, in the section headed Unauthorised Borrowing the Bank explains that "If you overdraw on your account or exceed an overdraft limit withour prior agreement, a higher rate of interest is charged on theis unauthorised borrowing. The rate is displayed in all branches. We may cover additional work involved in monitoring your account by charging the fees detailed below.

 

Unauthorised Borrowing

We charge this when you first overdraw your account, or go above the agreed overdraft limit by £50 or more. There will be a further charge each time you increase the amount borrowed over £50 or more, unless a higher limit is agreed with us or until the account is within its existing limit or in credit. This fee will aplly, for example, if you draw against cheques which have not fully cleared and this takes you overdrawn or over an agreed limit.

£12.50 Unapid item

 

We charge each time we have to return a cheque unpaid, or cannot pay a standing order or a direct debit, because ther isn't enough money in your account.

£30 for each item not paid"

 

By a letter of June 2005, the Bank gave notice of an increase in these charges to £15 and £35 respectively.

 

4. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a request for a payment tobe made fron the Banks own funds. If the Bank makes payment, or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet and makes a charge in accordance with the terms of the contract.

 

5. There is no breach of contract; the charge cannot therefore be a penalty, consequently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre-estimate of the Banks loss. It is denied that the charges are punitive or that they unduly enrich the Bank.

 

6. The customer is given advance warning of charges being imposed; customers are warned by letter when they go overdrawn or over their agreed limit without arrangement with the bank, that items will not be paid and that charges will be incurred. Statements show the charges, if any, the customer has incurred during the course of a month, and which will appear as debits on the followingmonth's statement.

 

7. It is denied that the Unfair Contract Terms Act or the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations apply to business customers who are not contracting as consumers, as required be the Act and the Regulations.

 

8. Without prejudice to the matters pleaded in paragraph 7 it is averred that the charges are fair and reasonable, and it is denied thatthey ar unlawful.

 

9. In the premises:

9.1 The charges are for banking services, and are not damages nor a penalty;

9.2 The Bank is entitled by contract to impose the charges, which are; fair and resonable.

9.3 It is denied that the charges are unlawful or contravane any statute or regulation.

 

10. The Claimants claim is denied.

 

 

Can anyone advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...