Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tv licence problem


upsy_daisy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5717 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi cant find any section for this so i put it here if you move it tell me where to please;

My hubby was fined and taken to court over no tv licence for a day or so (all these people that dont even have 1 we went 48hrs) he was all in all fined £120 now we payed it all bar £20 and moved then we got a letter stating we still owed the £20 we payed it with a postal order well before xmas so sep/oct and have never heard a thing untill this morning we get;

 

From a company called MARSTON HIGH COURT ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

dated 8days ago saying a final notice from HMCS wigan for no tv licence and a ballance of £245 because the final £20 was never payed

 

we have rang them they was damn right nasty we rang the court it came from she said now its with them there is nothin we can do for you sorry but we did try to contact you

 

We havent had a single letter/call ever so now what?? help me please i have 24hrs 3little children and mental health issues so im not in work at the min

OMG here we go again:eek:

 

RBOS round 2 prem letter sent 23/10/2008 14days and counting:rolleyes: no reply.....

RBOS LBA sent 11/11/2008

court papers finally issued 27th march they have to 27th april

 

Ambrose wilson/reliable collections account in dispute letter sent 22/10/2008 finally replied to letter 1 today but too late:p no news or replies to anythin now:mad:

 

 

Carpark management letter sent 22/10/2008

not heard anything-7th april 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

TV.L is a big government con, I despise paying it..

Anyway sorry for that, feel better now it’s off my chest.

I am a little lost here, you either have to pay yearly monthly or quarterly.

I can not understand how you owe them 20.00, but if it was paid at the PO I can not see them having a leg to stand on.

Oh yeah and see the vans that drive around, they really can not tell if you have a tv switched on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are on the cash easy entry scheme with them its a payment plan but i cant find my postal order stub it was nrly 12months ago must ov been binned after i didnt hear from them its ****ed me off more to the fact cause of there **** up its now gonna cost me more than the original bill all for as they put it £20

OMG here we go again:eek:

 

RBOS round 2 prem letter sent 23/10/2008 14days and counting:rolleyes: no reply.....

RBOS LBA sent 11/11/2008

court papers finally issued 27th march they have to 27th april

 

Ambrose wilson/reliable collections account in dispute letter sent 22/10/2008 finally replied to letter 1 today but too late:p no news or replies to anythin now:mad:

 

 

Carpark management letter sent 22/10/2008

not heard anything-7th april 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say you need to hop down to the CAB and ask for help on this one.

 

 

went today they have no apt till next week..so im fooked there gonna be here before i get in to see them how do i handle them?

OMG here we go again:eek:

 

RBOS round 2 prem letter sent 23/10/2008 14days and counting:rolleyes: no reply.....

RBOS LBA sent 11/11/2008

court papers finally issued 27th march they have to 27th april

 

Ambrose wilson/reliable collections account in dispute letter sent 22/10/2008 finally replied to letter 1 today but too late:p no news or replies to anythin now:mad:

 

 

Carpark management letter sent 22/10/2008

not heard anything-7th april 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marston are the new name of 'Drakes' they are the bailiffs that got all the bad press after a TV documentary not so long ago, they bought up a small company and now use their name to clean up their image.

 

Firstly, NEVER ever let a Bailiff into your home.

 

Secondly, it appears the court probably did write to you at your previous address, because you never responded the debt was passed to Marston's / Drakes, they've traced you to your new address and now seek payment.

 

Last but not least I suggest you write to the Post Office (I believe their investigation section is at Chesterfield) tell them which Post Office you purchased the Postal Order at, Date , Amount and whom payable to, I'm sure they can trace it. Surprisingly you are probably the only one to buy one for that amount on that date so then they'll have the Serial Number.

 

The £20 Marston's are after is for the balance of the £120 fine imposed by the magistrates court, not you defaulting on the CEE scheme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, I am having a similar problem. I lived in my own flat in 2002 but had a really bad car crash whereby I almost lost my life. I moved back in with my parents after that and was unaware that my T.V license hadn't been paid and I was having letters sent to the flat. Recently I have received a letter to my parents house from Marstons demanding £390 or they will remove goods. This is the first I knew about any of this. I have tried contacting them to set up a payment scheme as I am a lone parent and only work part time so it is impossible for me to make this full payment. Every time I ring I speak to a nasty woman who says "thats ur problem" and puts the phone down on me. Are they right when they say they will not accept a direct debit of £25 per week off me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am having a similar problem. I lived in my own flat in 2002 but had a really bad car crash whereby I almost lost my life. I moved back in with my parents after that and was unaware that my T.V license hadn't been paid and I was having letters sent to the flat. Recently I have received a letter to my parents house from Marstons demanding £390 or they will remove goods. This is the first I knew about any of this. I have tried contacting them to set up a payment scheme as I am a lone parent and only work part time so it is impossible for me to make this full payment. Every time I ring I speak to a nasty woman who says "thats ur problem" and puts the phone down on me. Are they right when they say they will not accept a direct debit of £25 per week off me?

 

HI P.Griff82 and welcome.

 

If I were you I would start a new thread about this problem.

 

I might be wrong (as I usually am according to my hubby), but if you can prove that you did not live at the address after you accident then you are not liable for any TV licence.

 

Have you since moved back into your original address? Or were you claiming benefits etc from your parents address?

 

If you have proof that you were not there at the time the TV Licensing people say you were then you should fight this.

 

After all £390 is a lot more than the licence fee so they have really over inflated their charges to begin with.

 

Somebody will advise you further on this one.

 

Good Luck and hope you are recovering

 

Elaine x

Link to post
Share on other sites

definately dont pay anything, esp to drakes [ops they've got sheeps clothes on now!]

 

get in contact with the TV.L explain what happened .

they might ask for evidence [that should be easy!]

and all should be sorted.

make sure they contact marston to get the debt cancelled. or atleat advise them immediately its in dispute.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot of correspondence missing here. There will be a couple of reminders and probably a visit or two from TVL, then a letter before action warning that they will apply to a court to enforce payment, then the summons and the court judgement for that summons.

There is bound to be at least a couple of letters after the court judgement and then letters and visits from the bailiff.

 

Are you saying you have received nothing at all griff?

 

How long were you in hospital and who terminated the tenancy and cleared your things from the flat?

 

Marston are the least of your worries and the fees added are not excessive.

It could be that your parents opened this mail but decided that you had enough to worry about without TVL adding to it. You should ask your parents about this.

 

Your first call is to the court to get this judgement set aside as this is a criminal offence and you could go to prison.

You must contact Marstons and let them know what you are doing.

 

Can you put some dates on how long you lived at the flat and how long you were in hospital and the expirey date of the tv licence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot of correspondence missing here. There will be a couple of reminders and probably a visit or two from TVL, then a letter before action warning that they will apply to a court to enforce payment, then the summons and the court judgement for that summons.

There is bound to be at least a couple of letters after the court judgement and then letters and visits from the bailiff.

 

Are you saying you have received nothing at all griff?

 

How long were you in hospital and who terminated the tenancy and cleared your things from the flat?

 

Marston are the least of your worries and the fees added are not excessive.

It could be that your parents opened this mail but decided that you had enough to worry about without TVL adding to it. You should ask your parents about this.

 

Your first call is to the court to get this judgement set aside as this is a criminal offence and you could go to prison.

You must contact Marstons and let them know what you are doing.

 

Can you put some dates on how long you lived at the flat and how long you were in hospital and the expirey date of the tv licence?

 

 

All letters and correspondence were being sent to the flat that I used to live in and only recently did I recieve one to my parents house which was the first I knew about it. I have been going through court to get full custody of my son so maybe they have somehow obtained my parents address through that. My parents handed my keys in for me but it was a few weeks after the accident and there were no letters there then. It is possible that the television fine was put in place from those few weeks after the crash that I had the keys to the flat but was staying at my parents. Because of this reason I am willing to pay the £390 but the main problem is that it is impossible for me to find this amount of money within a few days which is what Marstons are demanding. I can pay £25 per week through direct debit to come out of my wages but thats the best I can do right now. I thought that this would be good enough for them as I am willing to pay it but they just keep saying I can't and then put the phone down on me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an issue with TV Licence last year. When I left my ex, my ex write to state that the tv licence at our (well then mine) address was now in my name, and I did the same. When I moved to a new address I was paying tv licence and they came to my door to tell me I didnt have one, and I was in fact paying from my bank account for my ex's!!! (which he was doing also). I got this corrected but you do think I got refund? Nope because ex had to organise and would then be issued in his name!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...