Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I am stuck in Lisbon thanks to BMI. What can I do now.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5724 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To let you in on the story I booked a return flight for my wife, 2 children and myself from Birmingham to Lisbon to stay with my wifes family (she is portuguese)

 

We flew out with no problems first time from Birmingham and first time with BMI and I was very impressed. a 2 hour delay at Birmingham but overall the flight was good and Birmingham very easy to find.

 

yesterday the 8th we were due to return and after checking myself and the children through we came up with a problem. My wifes name on the check in computer was wrong! Not a typo, her name is Anabela yet the name on the computer was Susannah!!!! The surname was correct.

 

After a few calls by the check in assistant to see if we could fly she said that we had to ring BMI to sort the problem out. By this time it was 25 minutes until boarding. As you know you only enter each persons name in once on a return flight internet booking therefore I have no idea how they can get the right name on the outgoing journey and not the returning journey.

 

After 20 euros spent on my wifes debit card (the last money in her account) we had not spoken to anyone and been listening to BMIs music/busy statements. I had to make the decision to get back to the check in and get our bags back before they left on the plane.

 

So we are back at my wifes parents house. I have rung BMI this morning on their exorbatant phone line which means her father will now have a ridiculously high priced call on a phone he can ill afford and after 48 minutes of getting nowhere we had to end the call.

 

BMI have said that there is nothing they can do and that we will have to rebook a flight and then once back in the UK send them a claim for compensation and they will investigate.

 

Problem with this is neither of our families are wealthy, my wife and I only decided to come on the trip after some very careful monetary planning meaning we now have empty bank accounts. Therefore we know noone to lend us the money and have non of our own to get back to the UK. How can BMI do this to their passengers.

 

Other problems of course are that our car is in Birmingham Airport and was only paid up until last night therefore we will now get back (if we can) with no money to pay the extra days charges.

 

We are both hourly paid workers and not salaried therefore we are now missing days work due to this which again means we have no money.

 

I have contacted the British Embassy to see if they can help as my children and I are all british citizens. I dont have much confidence though.

 

Is there anything else I can do? Surely an airline has a responsibility of duty to make sure that an error that occurs on their flight is corrected first and then investigated?

 

I am at this time on the internet at one of my wifes friends house with all avenues of options closing in front of me and the spectre of us having to get jobs in Portugal to somehow get some money togethe to get back to the UK

 

Thanks in advance

Andy

Edited by Supercoley1
Update to title info
Link to post
Share on other sites

An update. The British embassy have called us back and although very sympathetic they cannot help with our problem. As we are not in danger etc due to having relatives to stay with it is beyonf their power to instruct or pay for an airline to take us back. BMI still say "hard Luck".

 

I have now sent emails to The Sun, Our local paper "the linconshire echo" and to AUC CAA

 

Andy

Edited by Supercoley1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just rung the travel insurance and they say we are not covered in this even however they say that with the problem not being of our fault wether it is BMI/ANA or TAP that is at fault our contract is with BMI and they therefore have a legal obligation to take us to the UK. My insurance has now transferred me to BMIs number and therefore we are only paying the charge to the insurance companies landline rather than BMIs preium rate line.

 

Heres hoping but as usual I guess it will be a waste of time.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason they have not automatically done this is presumably because they are not currently accepting liability for the issue. Personally I can see why *cynical hat on* I cant comprehend how it would be possible for the name on the ticket to be anything other than the name submitted on the website*cynical hat off* - therefore, they are not at this point accepting responsibility, but suspect(rightly or wrongly) that the name was misentered at the booking stage.

 

Were you not offered to be able to pay a fee to change the name on the ticket?

 

Why does your travel insurance say you are not covered - I would imagine they would have to say why specifically this situation is excluded?

 

I think you really need to consider that the cost of trying to resolve the issue over there is going to end up higher than buying a ticket and claiming it back. If this is a case where you physically cannot afford the ticket, I would have thought the embassy would be able to issue some form of emergency loan?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is with a low cost airline. The ticket is an e-ticket and the names on the email confirmation and even when I check the account on their site are all correct.

 

You only enter the names once for the return flights and we had no problem at Birmingham flying out.

 

Apparently the low cost airlines arent integrated into the system and send a manifest to the carrier who then puts the details into the system which the airport check against. therefore the mistake mustve been by ANA the portuguese carrier. I therefore assum that because this is the system that this airline uses that my contract is still with BMI and it is their responsibility to claim against the carrier.

 

The problem with paying and then claiming is that we paid a couple of months in advance at a total of £454 for the whole return journey. A single ticket at this late date is almost that each!!!! We dont have £1300 available and we know noone who can lend us this amount.

 

The Embassy were quite clear that they cannot pay!!!

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

The embassy does have the ABILITY to lend the money. Whether they feel it is a valid circumstance I suppose is another thing.

 

Irrespective, the reason BMI will not be paying is due to them not yet accepting liability.

 

The travel insurance is IMO your best bet of resolving this currently.

 

They are however a member of IATA - wonder if it is worth contacting them...?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now managed to find a much cheaper flight from Faro for £335 total for all 4 of us and my mother in England was able to pay this amount (alternative from Lisbon was £1200+bags etc and with the same carrier we have the problem with)

 

I do however now have to borrow the train fare to Faro and then bus from Faro station to the Airport.

 

The stage I therefore now at is the claim I need to make once I get back. What evidence do I need? Do I need to send it all with the claim?

 

So far I will be claiming for the extra flight costs £353

3½ days loss of earnings for me £175

2½ days loss of earnings for my wife £50

4 days extra parking at Birmingham £35

1 Taxi back from Lisbon airport I shouldnt have needed. £12

2 tickets for the train from Lisbon to Faro £40

2 tickets for the bus from Faro Station to Faro Airport £5

2 phone calls to BMIs useless and exorbatant phone line £60

3 phone calls to the British Embassy £10

 

Total here is £740. I will keep all tickets and receipts that I can but of course we dont have 1 for the taxi fare and we will have to wait for copies of our Father in Laws itemised bill to prove the phone charges.

 

Should I charge for hardship or anything else?

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any BMI representative or agent at the airport that you could speak to, to save you the costly phone calls?? There must be someone at the airport that can help you??

 

Being a low cost airline in a major airport there is no representative. The carrier person who checked us in tried the number (queue message) and couldnt keep holding because otherwise we would hold the whole plane up. she contacted her superiors and then gave us the BMI number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have the original email booking confirmation?? Is her name on it? I would take this to the airport and see if anyone can help. Good luck!

 

We had this with us but to no avail. No BMI reps or desk there and the ANA woman tried to do her best but eventually said we would have to contact BMI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Compensation for stress caused, definately!!! And disgust at their 'so-called' customer care! Be prepared to wait a while for the answers and money though, companies will take as long as possible in the hope you will give up and go away! Photocopy EVERYTHING!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it is Anabela on the printout, then Anabela WILL have been on the website and the problem is obviously in the data transfer between the web site and the transit company, definately not your fault, but that doesnt help you at the moment, whatever happens, that peice of paper is your new best friend, do not let it go anywhere, if someone wants to see it, then let them have a photocopy.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First bit of good news is that we are now back at home in Lincoln after leaving Lisbon via coach at 1am on Thursday Morning we arrived at Faro after a change of coach and got to the airport via taxi from whence we waited 4 hours for the cheapest flight we were able to find and got back to the UK at 12-40pm on Thursday. arrived back in Lincoln at4-30pm after waiting for bags, clearing the extra days on the car etc.

 

So now I am ready to start getting my claim together. I want to get it right so I shall take my time on it. I have receipts/tickets for everything except taxis.

 

Another good thing is AUC have replied. I will need to send them any correspondence that I make with BMI.

 

Hope this goes well and will be grateful for any help you can all provide.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

First bit of good news is that we are now back at home in Lincoln after leaving Lisbon via coach at 1am on Thursday Morning we arrived at Faro after a change of coach and got to the airport via taxi from whence we waited 4 hours for the cheapest flight we were able to find and got back to the UK at 12-40pm on Thursday. arrived back in Lincoln at4-30pm after waiting for bags, clearing the extra days on the car etc.

 

So now I am ready to start getting my claim together. I want to get it right so I shall take my time on it. I have receipts/tickets for everything except taxis.

 

Another good thing is AUC have replied. I will need to send them any correspondence that I make with BMI.

 

Hope this goes well and will be grateful for any help you can all provide.

 

Andy

 

Andy,

I can`t give advice on this one, but whish you luck on getting it sorted, you deserve it after all they put you through.

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...