Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your consumer rights within six months If a product develops a fault within the first six months after purchase, it’s assumed it has been there since the time of purchase. This means it’s up to the retailer to prove it wasn’t there when you bought it. If a repair or replacement has failed, you have the right to reject the goods for a full refund or price reduction. Your consumer rights after six months If a fault develops after six months, it’s up to you to prove it was faulty at the time of purchase or delivery.   .
    • Thank Dx , Im guessing its a waiting game for now .
    • Hey Fkofile , Im one of those that have been affected by it ! i made a post about it . my credit score has already been affected by it .
    • We initially raised a complaint with the finance company who told us that as its over 6 months the consumer rights act won’t apply and we would need to provide evidence of the problem being there at purchase. As we have only just got the report from Mercedes we haven’t been able to submit this within their 14 day timeframe. Is this not the case then? Thanks
    • The previously little-known Chinese-American businessman’s fortune was transformed by the British taxpayer through 11 government contracts worth approximately £4.3bn for lateral flow tests (LFTs) made in China and sold by Innova. Charles Huang says contracts generated $2bn (£1.6Bn) profit   The government fast-tracked the company after its British representatives sent a direct email to Dominic Cummings, the chief adviser to the then prime minister, Boris Johnson, in July 2020. And, a Guardian investigation has found, the fast-tracking of Innova was supported by the then chancellor Rishi Sunak’s team at the Treasury. Innova became for a period of at least four critical months the only company authorised to supply rapid Covid tests in the UK, despite scores of others developing similar kits. At the time, the government spending watchdog raised concerns   Boss of US firm given £4bn in UK Covid contracts accused of squandering millions on jets and properties | Coronavirus | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Rishi Sunak’s team helped fast-track deal with firm founded by Charles Huang, who says contracts generated $2bn profit  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA - At it again


cashins
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3942 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I really don't know what this company has to do for the authorities ever to bring them to book.

 

First, I have never been able to get a legible CCA out of them despite involving the F O S, T/S and copying OFT. They even had the cheek to say I never sent the £1, (when I complained).

 

Next was my complaint regarding their persistent marketing of loans, by post and by phone of an account which is in default. Suprise the above have again done nothing.

 

Now they tell me they have not received my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) or the £10 cheque, despite being delivered by special. They only came up with this when they got my letter before action, (please end another one).

 

It seems to me that this company has no interest in complying with the law of th land, secure in the knowledge that the powers that be will never take action against them.

 

Regarding the SAR, I can prove it was delivered and they are well outside the 40 days. I am minded to simple file a court claim with now further delay.

 

Question: In view of the b*ll**** they are coming out with, will the judge take a dim view of such action at this stage thinking if they have lost the papers, I should give them time to comply.

 

David

Edited by cashins
Pell
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I too am having the rin around with these bunch of ****** i have S.A.R'D them before they sent in optima legal which i then sent in a cpr 18 still no cca but its ok for them to take ppc payments without my agreement also not had any default letters or LBA'S from optima

 

Here is my thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/151709-help.html

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sent a Sar by special delivery to MBNA.

 

MBNA say of course, they never received it.

 

Royal Mail now tell me this item was part of a bulk delivery, in other words, it was delivered but no signature was obtained for it.

 

So what is the point of special delivery?

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are saying that they never received it....wait until the 40 days are up....send them a reminder of their obligations to provide the SAR, if they fail to respond within a further 14 days....then take it straight to the ICO...you have made MORE than a reasonable effort to post it by a guaranteed delivery !!! and you have the stamp to prove it....bar delivering it yourself and filming it on camera....what more could you do....

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well past the forty days, they've had the LBA for 21 days now.

 

I was just checking all the bases brfore the N1 went into court.

 

After a formal complaint to Royal Mail, they now tell me that they can send me the 'group' signature.

 

That will do.

 

Thanks

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect I am in the same boat though they did respond to a CCA request that was in the same envelope - looking forward to the repsonse to the reminder which Of course mentioned teh CCA and included a copy of the proof of delivery

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi cashins

 

it is normal for companies to have bulk delievery

the bar codes are put on a card, the company checks the number of items, then signs the card.

 

you can contact the delievery office where the item was sent to, give them the date, and they will retrieve the card.

they can tell you who signed for the items

 

hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all

 

As per post, Royal Mail say thats what they are doing.

 

Can only say it's a bit of a joke when you have to resort to the courts to get part of one of the largest banks in the world to comply with the laws of the country they happen to be operating in.

 

One result of the current financial screw up is that governments will no longer be able to perpetuate the myth that these organisations can be trusted, (don't embarress politicians, they won't forgive you) and hopefully give them a good kicking.

 

David

 

PS: If I was head of the FSA, I would be taking an interest in the Times appointments pages right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cap1/Debitas are saying they never received a CCA request from me and I did get a signature on recorded delivery! Any ideas?

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just got a letter, (handwritten envelope - postmark Cora Droma Ruisc, Eire).

 

Inside - MBNA Chester. They are selling my account which means, " I will no longer be a customer of MBNA":eek::eek::eek:.

 

Of course I can prevent this happening by calling 01244 674663 and making an immediate payment of £85.

 

Two days later, I got a nice flowery postcard from someone called Claire who is going to visit me this week, unless of course I phone the same number.

 

I wonder if she's bringing my leaving gift?

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi this is the normal MBNA crap to try to get you to ring they probably say that they will be calling on Friday etc (phone call).

 

They are just trying to get you to ring them so they can torment you into making a payment or if you are not X-directory to get your phone number.

 

dpick:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

MBNA used their ROI office when I was doing battle with them. I had a number of letters with ROI postmarks, followed by a couple of emails, all apparently from people with very Irish names - lots of accents - they obviously imagine that North and South are the same, and all speak gaelic. As a prod in NI (though a blow-in), I was unimpressed. I wrote to Chester and mentioned that MBNA (ROI) is a foreign company, and doesn't hold a UK consumer credit licence, so shouldn't be involved in chasing UK debt. MBNA wound their Irish necks in very quickly, and I never heard from the South again.

 

Faugh A Ballagh, MBNA...

Edited by ScarletPimpernel
Link to post
Share on other sites

This particular and futile ploy by the North American Merchant Bankers is similar to the silly one practised by the Leeds Losers where they use envelopes with a Scottish address on the rear to up the threat for their Scottish and Northern Ireland Victims. Crapquest seem to think that anyone north of Watford is subject to Scottish Law and threaten them with their scary Scottish solicitors Nolans.

 

With MBNA I suspect that 2/3rds of the population of Northern Ireland getting letters post marked from the Gaelic version of Carrick on Shannon would save them up for their annual bonfire and would be twice as unlikely to respond to threats from a foreign country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another missive from MBNA with, suprise a stay of execution and an improved offer, 40% of the balance.

 

This would register as a partial, but they would not take action on the balance. (Of course not they would sell it on). As they have no legal right to enforce the debt, I'll pass.

 

Joke is I have now been written to, within two days of each other by Paul Cambell, Head of Customer Assistance and Dee Dilstone, who is also Head of Customer Assistance.

 

Hmmmmmm, that must be interesting.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another missive from MBNA with, suprise a stay of execution and an improved offer, 40% of the balance.

 

This would register as a partial, but they would not take action on the balance. (Of course not they would sell it on). As they have no legal right to enforce the debt, I'll pass.

 

Joke is I have now been written to, within two days of each other by Paul Cambell, Head of Customer Assistance and Dee Dilstone, who is also Head of Customer Assistance.

 

Hmmmmmm, that must be interesting.

 

David

Maybe they are one and the same. Dee Dilstone crazy name crazy gal

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is turning into the long goodbye, more deadlines past, more offers keep coming.

 

I think they're really going to miss me, (or is it the £8k they will never see)?

 

It's getting a bit tedious, I've had my 'sorry you're leaving' card ready to post for a few days now.

 

Reaches for hanky....

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...