Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax Arrears - Occupancy Dispute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope someone can help as I am struggling to sort out my problem. The situation is as follows

 

Myself and my partner rented a property in Glasgow for 2 years between 2004 and 2006 from a private landlord. We moved out of the property in our own property on the 4th August 2006.

 

All was fine until 18th August 2008 when we received letter from Debt Collect Agency BCW advising a summary warrant has been obtained for council tax arrears for £121.78.

 

Upon contacting Glasgow City Council they advised that the council tax had been paid up until the end of July 2006 and the amount due was for the period of August - September 2006.

 

My biggest problem is that I am unable to prove that myself and my partner did not reside in the property for the disputed period. We can prove that we were living in our current property but do not have a copy of a lease agreement and I am unsure whether we had a written lease agreement, all payments were cash in hand but a friend had previously rented the property and had no issues.

 

I advised the council that the letter from BCW was the first we knew about the arrears and if we had been aware of the problem then we would have fully co-operated to resolve the issue at the time. They have advised that they had sent a reminder letter to the property in September 2006 (after we had left) and then contacted the leasing company, property matters, which was news to us as we dealt solely with the landlord and landlady. The landlord and landlady had forwarding details for our new property as they were quick enough to get in contact when the final gas and electricity bills were sent to them (They were in the landlord's name) which we paid direct to the landlord via the bank details they had provided us. Glasgow City Council also confirmed they had been unable to contact the landlord of the property even though they had their details.

 

I have contacted BCW and they have halted proceedings until mid-septemeber to give us time to resolve the dispute with Glasgow City council but I am unconviced Glasgow City Council will do much.

 

I have contacted the landlord using a mobile contact number we had but when I stated my name and that I was calling regarding the property they hung up and now refuse to take any of my calls.

 

I have provided the landlord name, contact number and current address for the landlord to the council and they have promised to try and locate them but I will not hold my breath.

 

I am currently trying to locate as much documentation I can to build a case for us not staying in the property (on the advise of Citizens advice) such as details of full and final payment for the telephone line but without the lease I am currently getting nowhere.

 

As the council only know we resided in the property becuase we were paying the council tax and they have no copy of any tenacy agreement to say we did stay in the property how can they solely pursue ourselves for the debt and not even bother with the landlord.

 

Any suggestions how we can proceed in this matter would be greatly appreciated as I really cant afford to pay for something I am not responsible for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We did register for council tax for our current property and will be able to provide records to that effect but I am unsure this will help as the council will say we were liable for both properties as we could have been staying in both properties at the same time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i work for a local council and as far am aware you can not be charged for 2 properties at the same time. You should be able to get the bill amended, but don't go through balliffs go to the council office for the bill to be amended and for the council to recontact balliffs. You might find the balliff charges will still stand, you could could put in a appeal at the council office, depending if you notified the council at the time you moved out? the council should change the records and make your old landlord liable and the bill go to him

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted Glasgow City Council who have been very helpful again and have advise dthey are going to investigate further and confirmed that we have been paying council tax in our current property from 4th August 2006 and if we can provide a final phone bill and proof of removal of household items (i.e. rental van receipt) then we would qualify for a unoccupied property exemption.

 

Hopefully this will resolveour issue. Ill keep you posted...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks daviesjlee I have now recevied a letter from GCC advising that there had been a mistake and that no further action will be taken on the account so £120 saved.

 

I am very surprised though as we did not provide GCC with any documentation from BT or proof that we had moved our possesions from the property as they had requested for the exemption. The only thing I can think is the landlord provided a copy of the lease to GCC but I would be amazed if that had happened.

 

The second letter we received on the same day as the GCC letter was from BCW advsing my partners wages would be arrested if we did not pay up but one phone to BCW confirmed they also have the issue as resolved. now just need to fight with them to get a letter confirming this as apparently "BCW do not do letters" as I was helpfully advised by one of their sterling advisors.

 

Suppose that will be a post for another day :D

 

Thanks once again one and all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

I have joined this in the hope that someone out there can help me.

 

This is a long story so please dont go

I recieved a commital to prison letter in may of this year for a poll tax bill, yes poll tax 1989/1990 and community charge bill for the year 1990/1991 amounting to £184.00.

I got in touch with Liverpool City Council and asked what this was about as I was then in full time employment, working FOR LIverpool City Council and paying my poll tax through attachment of earnings. They then said that it was my resposibility to make sure I was paying enough and as I was not (according to them) it is my fault. As I have not kept bills or reciepts for18 years I have NO way of proving I paid enough so asked them to send out a statement. I recieved the statement and on it was another bill for 1994 for council Tax to the amount of £115.00.

 

I pointed out about the statute of limitations law that says you can not claim a dept over 6 years unless it has a liability order on them and apparently they have (ALL NEWS TO ME.)

 

I then got a visit off the baliffs and because I have told the council that I am fighting this through the C.A.B. My costs are going up and the baliffs are being not very nice, and to top it off I have just heard from the C.A.B. that Liverpool City Council are now saying I owe nearly £900.00 from the year 1989 until the year 1996.

 

I relise that I have a huge battle ahead of me this has been going on since may, as I will be taking on the goverment. The reason being that when the statute of Limitations law was put in to force it was obviously voted on by our mps and Lo and behold who is exempt from that law.

 

1) Council Tax

2) Benafits

3) Income Tax and Tax Credits

 

all goverment related. I know I am getting a bit on my high horse and losing the plot as I need to sort out my council tax first BUT I thought it was us who run the country not the goverment that ran us. I don't remember it being a dictatorship.

 

So before I go in to that battle (with I hope an army) I need to know if anyone knows of anything I can do over this council tax dept that I knew nothing about.

 

Please Please help if you can I would really be very grateful.

 

Boda:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...