Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

G E Money and Secret Commissions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have seen evidence of secret commissions in excess of £3,000 (which was about 5% of the total of the loan) paid to brokers on sub prime deals. That is aside to the broker fee mentioned in the agreement !!...

 

Wilson vs Hurstanger is an important case to look at. - Wilson and another v Hurstanger Ltd

 

And these too - House of Commons Hansard Debates for 16 Oct 2001 (pt 5)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/204597-secret-commission-case-law.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 621
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hi if G E Money never had a charge on my property , is this classed as unsecured loan and eviction set for wednesday not enforcable ???,.. any helpwill be greatly appreciated as we are at court tomorrow to suspend eviction ,.. thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi if G E Money never had a charge on my property , is this classed as unsecured loan and eviction set for wednesday not enforcable ???,.. any helpwill be greatly appreciated as we are at court tomorrow to suspend eviction ,.. thanks in advance

Hi - I think Im right in saying that they could have put the charge on your home at a later date and therefore the monies became secured - I dont see how you could be facing eviction without their having this Charge in place already? but you would have to be notified of such a thing = they cannot do it behind your back so to speak. In court tomorrow!! - if you have doubts about what is going on make sure you let the judge know as you should be fully informed of your rights and know whats happening and why and therefore also able to defend your rights! Try to get matter put to a later date if there are issues to be looked at still and get the court usher to get the duty solicitor to speak with you urgently, before you see the judge- as it sounds like you are not represented.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Im new to this forum so bare with please if i make mistakes etc. I just read your post on GE Money, i have a mortgage with them. Oh my word, i have lodged my complaint with the fao with reguards fees, comissions, broker fees etc etc the money just dsnt add up at all, i have been at my wits end. Not sure what else to right on here hope someone can shine sum light for me xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea behind challenging on secret commissions and the aim is to get the judge to agree that they had a fidiciary duty to disclose the commission in the first place or it could be argued that the broker wasn't doing it in the best interests of the customer and that they could have been swayed by a 'colluded'/unfair/backhander deal. A judge would state that, and bring the agreement back to the start of when you took the money out, he/she would negate the deal and you pay back the original amount you borrowed without interest. However let's say you borrowed £25,000 and had made £23,000 of payments then a judge would say pay the remaining £2,000...however there might also be issues with restitution and restitutionary damages in your favour also....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no expert Michelle, but if there is no charge on your property, the loan is unsecured, and there is no way the lender can reposess your property. Whatever next? Credit cards and club book companies will be taking peolples homes.

As Campari says, to put a charge on your house, the lender would have had to seek an order from the court, and you would have known.

Is it that GE took over the debt from an earlier company that held a charge? I have seen something about this on the net somewhere...and there is a court case history on it too......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Pacluc....you should state that the action is vexatious and unlawful as you have no agreement with them or any notice of assignment under English law...nor any proof of securitisation under English law too...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Im new to this forum so bare with please if i make mistakes etc. I just read your post on GE Money, i have a mortgage with them. Oh my word, i have lodged my complaint with the fao with reguards fees, comissions, broker fees etc etc the money just dsnt add up at all, i have been at my wits end. Not sure what else to right on here hope someone can shine sum light for me xx

 

Hi lynzi79

 

You will probably get a better response if you start your own thread. call it something like 'GE Money claiming back unfair charges' .

 

To start a new thread, come out of this thread and back into Mortgages and secured loans. Go to the top left of the page just below the CAG announcement and click on 'New Thread':)

 

The route to reclaiming unfair charges is firstly to reconstruct your account, and you do this by finding all the information right from the beginning. Request a full statement of account from GE, then a SAR, then confirm what is unfair and wrong, complain to GE and then complain to the FOS.

 

Make your own thread and people will help with the steps.

 

Good Luck

Regards

 

on*the*case

 

Never Give Up! Never Surrender!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I have seen is the Non Status Guidelines that only seem to call into question their fitness to hold a credit license......?

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_credit/oft192v2.pdf

 

Excellent link ,.. it says it all , can see many things in this link were my lenders/broker have messed up big time , and feel I need to dispute the full amount , as in breach in many respects ,.. quite a few things to void the agreement and pay what was borrowed ,.. definately , I was at court today and had an eviction stood down for 8 weeks on sale of home ,.. but might put sale on hold whilst I look into this dispute ,.. I have had the mortgage for 7 years (thought it was 6) ,.. £31,000 advanced ,.. paid for 7 years £22,000 , today outstanding amount £44,000 ,.. only in arreas £5,700 which is in dispute ,.. monthly payment £260 ,.. missed say 10 payments max,.. thats £2,600 in my books ,.. (or they about round figures) ,.. so say I have paid £20,000 taking away the recent missed payments ,.. that means I would be entitled to £20,000 back of G E Money ,.. but I owe them £31,000 ,.. so £11,000 difference ,.. so I owe £11,000 as £20,000 paid = £31,000 total ,... mst be worth me going full out to prove void mortgage due to secret commission ,.. as £11,000 owed sounds a million times better then £44,000 still owed after paying £20,000 over the 7 years ,.. what are others thoughts on this , thanks in advance ,.. ready to fight

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://i591.photobucket.com/albums/ss355/DAZZAJOJO/SCAN0005-1.jpg

 

Hello again,my latest letter from GE (after getting accused of being on a fishing expedition!).

 

Do I have anywhere to go or shall I give up on this one?

 

Thanks in advance x

 

 

I got similar letters from Mr T Simpson. He wanted £150 + VAT for copies of the underwriting sheet. I sent a tenner to Bernard Elliston, Sandler & Co and asked for all data they had. They didn't want to send it but after reminding them that they were a legal firm and should comply with the law, they finally sent me what I wanted.

 

Letters attached, details removed obviously...

 

http://i911.photobucket.com/albums/ac314/itshomer/IgrouptoBesInstructionsafe.jpg?t=1259859138

 

http://i911.photobucket.com/albums/ac314/itshomer/bestoalabastersafe.jpg?t=1259859207

 

http://i911.photobucket.com/albums/ac314/itshomer/bestoalabaster2safe.jpg?t=1259859263

 

http://i911.photobucket.com/albums/ac314/itshomer/underwritingsheetsafe.jpg?t=1259859309

 

 

Strange as the letter from Igroup / GEMoney tells BES&Co there are no commissions payable to Alabaster (Ocean Finance).

 

GEMoney think they are above the law. Their solicitors know that they are not. ;)

 

Think this may be the only way you will find out the secret commissions.

 

HomerJ

 

 

 

Also funny that if "You would have been provided with disclosure of any commissions prior to entering into your loan agreement", GEMoney always seem to be unable to include a copy of this letter you would have received. Surely it forms part of your data subject access request.

Igroup to Bes Instruction (safe).jpg

Edited by HomerJSimpson
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://i591.photobucket.com/albums/ss355/DAZZAJOJO/SCAN0005-1.jpg

Hello again,my latest letter from GE (after getting accused of being on a fishing expedition!). Do I have anywhere to go or shall I give up on this one?

Thanks in advance x

 

and to add to the advice from andrew1

 

6yrs statute barred begins from the time you were made of the issue you now raised...so if you have only recently been made aware then the clock begins then, not when the agreement is dated. ....... Go for it.

 

The Court will allocate the track not GE, and allocation is not always dependent on the claim value. They are being obstructive, have a look at CPR 27.2(3) 'The court of its own initiative may order a party to provide further information if it considers it appropriate to do so'. This does apply to small claims and means the Judge can order disclosure, particularly if it is of importance to your case.

 

A terse reply is called for :-x

Regards

 

on*the*case

 

Never Give Up! Never Surrender!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems the original theme of the thread has gone missing a little......we were exploring the possibilities of agreements being unenforceable where secret commissions have been paid. Trouble is, no law exists, and we dont have any case law or precedent to quote.

Have a click on this link, it's a step in the right direction.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8282264.stm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all ,... well had another thought , if I used a no win no fee property solicitor , to fight my case and I happen to win ,.. would I be able to claim them fees off G E Money ? ,.. as if so then surely must be worth bring an expert along to put your case forward ,.. I know we get to know lots through this forum , but I think a professional spokesman would be great and oly strengthen our cases and show we mean business ,.. well all thoughts on this will be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

michellej, its still early days for reclaiming unfair mortgage charges. Its like the position a couple of years ago with Bank Charges. We have the advantage of the GMAC ruling by the FSA to set a sort of bench mark. At the moment the route is via a complaint to the FOS, its after that route has been explored that Court action will start, and thats when legal heavies will become involved. I am looking forward to American style group actions against the lenders (assuming the current legislation goes through).

Regards

 

on*the*case

 

Never Give Up! Never Surrender!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello HomerJ ,thanks for all that , looks like you have been successful.

 

Were Bernard Elliston their solicitors at the time? or yours? I already asked my solicitors for any details they have and they said they have nothing from the transaction. The solicitors mentioned on my SAR details are SIMPLY LAW. These were obviously involved from GE's end...? The broker is no longer working and can't be tracked down,so GE's solicitors would be my only option now. Should I just Subject access request them with a tenner ? I have found a solicitors called 'simply law' based in Watford...this has got to be them! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello on*the *case,

I have had a look at the Part you mentioned.I am so unfamiliar with court proceedings and terms though . How terse should I get in my response to them? Obviously I will mention that the 6 year rule doesn't apply in this case (as yourself and Andrew1 have kindly pointed out to me).

As I have said above, I will SAR the solicitors mentioned following HomerJ's lead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

michellej, its still early days for reclaiming unfair mortgage charges. Its like the position a couple of years ago with Bank Charges. We have the advantage of the GMAC ruling by the FSA to set a sort of bench mark. At the moment the route is via a complaint to the FOS, its after that route has been explored that Court action will start, and thats when legal heavies will become involved. I am looking forward to American style group actions against the lenders (assuming the current legislation goes through).

 

Hi on*the*case , I will not be going down the road of claiming unfair charges ,.. regarding the fees I mention , these would be solicitors fees ,.. as I can get a solicitor on No win No fee ,.. if we win would G E be expected to compenstate my costs to solicitor? ,.. as solicitor fees are 25% of claim , and as the account says £44k owed ,.. original loan £31k ,.. paid £22k over the years ,.. void agreement equals lenders owed £9k,... obviously my solicitor will expect 25% of £35k,.. as if we win debt will move from £44k to £9k

Edited by michellej
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for reply ,.. yes will ask , and definately listen carefully ,.. Well it will be costs you would not otherwise have if not part of a inflated agreement which in the eyes of the law is void and not enforcable ,.. and as it is the claiment who has recieved the injustice , then surely fees should be cover , and if not ,then possible another courtcase to claim these as money owed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to butt in, I am being taken to court by Link in connection to an unseured home improvement loan, as part of my request for disclosure of documents Link sent an A4 sheet titled 'Payout Signoff Sheet', on this sheet its stated the following :-

 

Commissions Due -

 

Advance £****.**

PPP Premium £ ***.**

Additional £ ***.**

 

Until now I had no knowledge of 'commissions' paid in setting up this account, its not in the agreement & not mentioned anywhere in the SAR we made.

 

Have we got something here in which to fight back with? Companies involved were Pinnacle Insurance (PPP)/GE Money/Europlas

 

I would be most greatful for any advice.

 

Apologies to the OP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...