Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Clarification: Why Are unsigned Credit Card Agreements enforceable (even if you have used the card)?


mikek
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5365 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I did some digging up and this what I discovered from the Consumer Credit Act 1974 with regards to unsigned agreements for credit cards:

 

66 Acceptance of credit-tokens

(1) The debtor shall not be liable under a credit-token agreement for use made of the credit-token by any person unless the debtor had previously accepted the credit-token, or the use constituted an acceptance of it by him.

 

(2) The debtor accepts a credit-token when—

 

(a) it is signed, or

 

(b) a receipt for it is signed, or

 

© it is first used,

 

 

either by the debtor himself or by a person who, pursuant to the agreement, is authorised by him to use it.

 

So yes you are liable for the credit card debt if you used it at least once. But the agreement is unenforceable if it does not have any signature:

 

61 Signing of agreement

 

(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

 

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

 

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

 

© the document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

 

AND only the court can enforce an improperly executed agreement:

 

65 Consequences of improper execution

 

(1) An improperly-executed regulated agreement is enforceable against the debtor or hirer on an order of the court only.

 

And the court will not enforce an agreement that is not signed IN ANY WAY:

 

127 Enforcement orders in cases of infringement

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

THEREFORE, NO SIGNATURE OF ANY KIND ON A CREDIT CARD DOCUMENT= NOT POSSIBLE TO ENFORCE

 

IF YOUR BANK CANNOT PRESENT A DOCUMENT WITH YOUR SIGNATURE ON IT, THEY CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO RECOVER THE BALANCE. OTHER MISSING PRESCRIBED TERMS HAVE THE SAME EFFECT.

 

I think it is clear cut now

 

Edited by mikek

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Most of the credit card agreements are pre-signed pieces of paper, the only real signature on them is usually the customers. A digitially signed loan agreement, such as one you take out over the internet with your bank will not have an ink signature on it, is this a legal document?

I took a loan out with the tsb on the internet, and they signed it using my internet password!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As anyone actually succeeded in doing this?

What would be the steps to take?

Does been on a debt management plan alter this?

 

Have about 6 cards and can only remember signing for one of them so would be intrested to pursue this without paying the solicitor sharks that have shot up to process claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi some of us on CAG have taken creditors to court to have agreements declared improperly executed and so irredeemably unenforceable.

 

In my own case I have taken action against MBNA and J.D. Williams both settled out of court when a Judge ordered disclosure of the original signed credit agreements etc.

 

 

Littlewoods settled before court with same no agreement.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi some of us on CAG have taken creditors to court to have agreements declared improperly executed and so irredeemably unenforceable.

 

In my own case I have taken action against MBNA and J.D. Williams both settled out of court when a Judge ordered disclosure of the original signed credit agreements etc.

 

 

Littlewoods settled before court with same no agreement.

 

dpick

 

Hi dpick,

Could you give anymore details/links on how to go about this,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I have it in writting from nationwide credit card that they do not have a signed copy of my agreement but when i fell behind on payment they froze my current account and took the £560 out of my account without my permission. I am now taking them to the small claims court to claim for that money back what are my chances of sucseeding?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes, if you have applied online for an account and accepted the Ts and Cs i think this makes it valid. Wasnt this change brought in for agreements AFTER feb 07.

20 Creditors including 1 CCJ with - you guessed it - Bryan Carter! £13467.43 owing. £2000 paid off in the past 12 months!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Yes

 

Maybe not always Yes.

 

I used the points below (among others) to get 3 accounts written off by a DCA who sent an application form, unsigned by the bank, as compliance with a s.78 request. The total amount was quiet a bit. On top of that, their 'agent' paid me compensation for chasing the accounts.

 

For your information and without going into too much detail here, as you will be aware of your legal obligations, a valid credit agreement must contain certain terms within the signature document (s.60(1)(2) CCA 1974). These core terms are the credit limit, repayment terms and the rate of interest (SI 1983/1553 (6 Signing of agreement) which states that the prescribed terms must be within the signature document. (Column 2 schedule 6). s.61(1)(a) states the agreement must contain all the prescribed terms and be signed by both the debtor and on behalf of the creditor.

 

As you will know section 180(1)(b) authorises, “the omission from a copy of certain material from the original, or the inclusion of certain material in condensed form”. This refers to statutory instruments made under the heading Copies of document regulations and in this care in particular to SI 1983/1557.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
As anyone actually succeeded in doing this?

 

Yes

 

I took out motorcycle insurance on a pay monthly basis and ended this after 2 months.

 

On being chased unfairly in my opinion for an amount that they said was due to early cancelation the company chased me for 70+ pounds! I told them that the debt would not be paid unless a court order had been obtained first and for the last 2 months have not heard from them!

 

The reason for not paying unless a court order was present is complicated but the general basis was the fact that I asked for a copy of the signed consumer credit agreement! And so far they have not complied!

 

When I say “complicated” what I mean is that there were other grounds for refusing to pay! 1 being that when the policy was sold to me on the phone the agent forgot to tell me about the £15 set up cost for direct debit and also the £30 cost with the loan company! They also failed to tell me the total cost of credit and that if I were to cancel early the costs would be more!!

 

I am now looking into this with other accounts as they too have no signed copy of the agreement!!

 

Morally and legally in my opinion you must NOT take out credit and then try to get out of paying it!! So please do not ask for credit and then spend the credit recklessly knowing that you will be unable to pay it back as this constitutes fraud and is punishable in law. However when the company that you have been with for years turns round in a credit crunch and downturn and treats customers by INCREASING the interest rates substantially then in my personal opinion use whatever legal method you have to protect you from them.

 

I have read and understand to the best of my ability the consumer credit act 1974 and also understand the amended act 2006 has closed the doors on most of the loop holes in consumer credit agreements made after May 2006. The loan companies will be much more vigilant in future and most if not all agreements will be correctly formatted and enforceable.

 

I made some very specific study into unsigned consumer credit agreements and plan to go ahead with refusal to pay on one or two of my accounts but advise caution as some agreements may still be enforceable and especially if they have been made after May 2006 and if made online or in an electronic form over the internet then a signed agreement may not be essential in enforcement in law.

 

Proceed with caution!

 

good luck

 

the future is credit free!

Edited by mallyonline
Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I correct in saying that failure of a credit card company to supply a copy of the agreement after a valid request and payment of the £10 fee (as well as several reminders) renders the contact unenforceable.

 

Hi the quick answer is no they are in default and should not try to enforce (but they do) they can enforce again if they later produce the enforceable agreement. The fee for CCA request is £1 and for Subject Access Request is £10.

 

The agreement only becomes unenforcable if they admit no agreement or if they finally produce an agreement and that agreement did not contain all the required terms and the agreement was issued prior to the 2006 CCA amendments.

 

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Guys

I have been reading all the comments with regards to non enforceable credit card agreements. I took out a halifax credit card in 2005 over the internet and went down the track of having one of these loan shark companies assess my credit agreement. They came back with a glorified report stating many areas did not comply with the CCA law. I was then told that a solicitor would take my case on a no win no fee basis. However, the documentation (like all lawyers) mentioned words like "if" you are unsuccessful, or "if" things dont go your way. I havent signed the documentation as in my eyes either an agreement is right or it is wrong. Wouldn't you agree? Also I am unsure how I stand with regards to applying for the card over the internet? Does the principle in law still stand? I asked Halifax to send me a copy of my signed agreement but they refused to do so and subsequently sent me a copy of an agreement which was different to the one that I hold? I am thinking of writing to Halifax to tell them to take me to court. Has anyone had any dealing with halifax?

 

Thanks

lethaldebs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi there,

I have lots of problems with them as well as they are refusing to disclose CCA for 2 credit cards. One is closed as paid it off a few years ago, but the funny bit is HALIFAX would not even disclose the SAR after 3 months of correspondence. I have then informed the ICO and FOS - still waiting but I am sure that it willl be sorted very soon.

Second credit card - Halifax did send the SAR, but stil waiting for CCA as second letter I have sent saying that they are in default already and by 15th May 2009 Halifax will commit an offence. Stil waiting.

They are trying so hard not to give millions of people what they have taken for so many years illigally; but the more they hold back all these money the greater the fall banks will have.

When you think that these money are carying all the suffering, tears, even lifes of lots of poor people....

I would like to ask them about their moral? It might be less then zero anyway.

Halifax is one of the most ignorant bank and as soon as I am clearing all these, I am saying a big GOOD BYE!

Their loss but we still going to fight back! I am unemployed anyway so I have nothing to lose. Eve if I will go back to work I will not give up.

Good luck and looking forward for many happy news from everyone:p

 

 

 

Hi Guys

I have been reading all the comments with regards to non enforceable credit card agreements. I took out a halifax credit card in 2005 over the internet and went down the track of having one of these loan shark companies assess my credit agreement. They came back with a glorified report stating many areas did not comply with the CCA law. I was then told that a solicitor would take my case on a no win no fee basis. However, the documentation (like all lawyers) mentioned words like "if" you are unsuccessful, or "if" things dont go your way. I havent signed the documentation as in my eyes either an agreement is right or it is wrong. Wouldn't you agree? Also I am unsure how I stand with regards to applying for the card over the internet? Does the principle in law still stand? I asked Halifax to send me a copy of my signed agreement but they refused to do so and subsequently sent me a copy of an agreement which was different to the one that I hold? I am thinking of writing to Halifax to tell them to take me to court. Has anyone had any dealing with halifax?

 

Thanks

lethaldebs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...