Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
    • Normally we don't advise playing your cards early in a snotty letter, but as you have appealed we might as well use what you wrote in the appeal against them. There is no rush, you have until 6 July to get it to them.  See what the other regulars think too. How about something like this? -   Dear Rachael & Sean, cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea you'd actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and would cough up! As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence.  Had you done so you would have seen that I appealed to your client.  Indeed the driver on the day is a textbook example of having done exactly what you should do when you do not wish to be bound by the T&Cs in a private car park. Of course none of that mattered to the spivs you represent but do you really want to put such a useless case in front of a judge? To be fair, your clients are very useful members of the human race - as comedians.  How I loved the page turner of their antics at The Citrus Building in Bournemouth.  It was chuckle after chuckle reading about them, letter after letter, month after month, insisting they were legally in the right, even through someone who had done just the first day of a GCSE law course could have told them they weren't.  Until the denouement - BOOM - an absolute hammering in court.  In fact - SLAM, BANG - managing to lose twice against the same motorist for the same car park in front of two different judges. Your client can either drop their foolishness now or get yet another tolchocking* in court where I will go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spend the dosh on a nice summer holiday, while every day laughing at your clients' expense. I look forward to your deafening silence. COPIED TO COUNTRYWIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT LTD   *  This word is used under licence from Brassnecked
    • Well yes, ... and the tax dodgers ... Trump May Owe $100 Million From Double-Dip Tax Breaks, Audit Shows A previously unknown focus of an I.R.S. audit is a dubious accounting maneuver that effectively meant taking the same write-offs twice on a Chicago skyscraper. nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM  
    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Non existant eBay Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5793 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello after a brief panic and a quick google I came across this site.

I have received a letter from Intrum Justitia claiming to be acting on behalf of ebay Europe SARL over a balance of £49.17.

The thing is I have never set up a sellers account on eBay which has been confirmed on the eBay chat help and my account balance is 0.

They (ebay) suggested I emailed them with the details, however I now seem to be going around in circles.

They confirm that my account has never been set up as a sellers account, but then go on to say it may be a secondary account but I have to email them from this secondary account to find out the details.

As I have no secondary account this is impossible, I have expressed concern that my name and address are being used fradulently, they say they will investigate but it will take up to 30 days.

I contacted Intrum Justitia via phone and explained all this but they are still demanding I pay them.

Looking on the forums it seems others are having problems but they seem to be over late payments.

Just wondering what my next step is as I go on holiday in a week and would like to get the ball rolling before that. I don't fancy coming home to a pile of threatening letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't really help but I'm interested to hear of your experience as my mum recently received a demand for payment/threat of further action type letter from a DCA (not sure which one) addressed to my recently-deceased sister (all post from my sister's address is being forwarded to mum's address) with regard to a supposed debt of c.£44 in regard of eBay. Now, I know my sister did sell some stuff on eBay but I was surprised to hear of this alleged debt of £44 because all she used to sell was small stuff at small prices (books/clothing she no longer wanted and some small crafted/knitted items) which would be unlikely to accrue that much in outstanding seller fees.

 

In our case my mum has contacted the DCA and they have said the debt will be dropped/annulled on receipt of a copy of the death certificate but your experience does make me wonder about where this supposed debt has come from and how legitimate it is...

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is typical of the behaviour exhibited by DCAs. Don't worry - we're all well-used to it by now.

 

You need to send off a letter to IJ saying that eBay is investigating a probable fraud and you will contact them when you hear back from eBay, and leave it at that.

 

 

Whatever you do don't ever talk to them on the phone. As you have found out DCAs can be pretty aggressive so tell you will only correspond in writing.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an update to my post above, I've spoken with my mum and the letter to my sister came from Intrum Justitia too - which makes me even more suspicious of this supposed debt. Thankfully, it seems to one thing that does get a DCA to back off (and the guy on the phone to apologise profusely, according to my mum) is being told that the person they are chasing has recently died. :mad:

 

I have to say though, this seems really dodgy to me. DCAs aggressively chasing people for debts is one thing, but this seems more like a deliberate fraud - chasing people for debts they don't have. Who are Intrum Justitia and do they actually have any authority from eBay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many years ago my wife had some problems with IJ and had nothing but hassle, even long after she had gone bankrupt:mad:

Sorry to say it took the threat of court action for harrassment in writing from us to finally get them to leave us alone, this was after they had been contacted by the official recievers on her behalf as they were like a dog with a bone. They just wouldn't let it go!

I wish you nothing but luck with this company, in my opinion, and in my experience with them, they are evil and cruel.

Best fight fire with fire then ;-):grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a letter along these lines OK or is it too aggresive

 

 

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

I am writing in response to your letter (copy included) of 25th July 2008 in which you claim I owe the sum of £49.17 with regards to an eBay account in my name. Please be advised that I do not have an eBay sellers account, nor will I be paying any money to Intrum Justicia or eBay Europe SARL.

 

Please take this as a formal warning that I do not take too kindly to un-solicited letters from companies requesting money. Your letter offers no evidence (nor does it offer to provide any) of any alleged debt/outstanding account. To put my mind at rest, as I’m sure this is all a mis-understanding, I require you furnish me with a signed agreement between eBay and myself that outlines the account you mention.

 

If you cannot/will not supply this information, I will have to make a Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request in order to find out how you obtained my details, and where this alleged “debt” came from. The Subject Access Request is a legal procedure which you, by law, have to follow. I fully intend to carry out this procedure if I find the documentation you supply (at my informal request) fails to address my concerns.

 

At this time - as there is no documentation to support this claim - I am unable to assist with this matter. Please ensure that any future correspondence includes all the relevant documentation – Failure to provide this will result in me having to take legal action as I consider your efforts at money extortion to be tantamount to harassment.

 

Due to your lack of signed documentation between myself and the original creditor, you may formally consider this “debt” in dispute – and as such, you are not permitted to attempt collection of this money without first referring back to the original creditor. If I do not hear from you within 7 days, I shall consider this matter closed and no further correspondence will be entered into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Intrum Justitia will chase anything. They sent a collector round to my house many years ago to collect a £1.63 debt out standing on a old Halifax credit card. Incured interest apparently, from when I paid it of in full.

 

But the onus is on IJ to prove there is a debt not on you to disprove it. So if you have it in writing from eBay that you never had a sellers account. Let them prove otherwise. The letter you have posted above should be sufficient.

 

Don't let them intimidate you into paying anything you don't owe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...