Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
    • Not at all.  The onus is on them to ensure that their invoice respects the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to establish keeper liability.  Which it can't as the area is covered by bye-laws. Spot on. Irrelevant as to whether you entered into a contract with VCS to pay them £100 if you didn't obey what was written on their silly signs. Who cares?  What about their ridiculous generic Particulars of Claim where they deliberately mix up driver and keeper. And where do they mention this?  You haven't shown us anything. Of course you have to prepare a Witness Statement and you'd better get on with it. This is the problem here - you've disappeared for months & months, haven't kept us updated and presumably haven't read other VCS threads.  That needs to change - now. Otherwise you will lose - simple as that. For a start - please upload the court order which fixes the hearing date plus plus where "VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet".  We're not mind readers.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I woundered if someone could help me with a problem that I am facing. I emigrated to Australia back in Jan 2003 with my family and I have been living in Australia ever since and don't plan to come back to the UK (part from holidays).

 

My father-in-law (FIL) received a letter for me (which he had opened) regarding a debt I owe (2,800.00 pounds) from Cahoot. I have not used the card since I have been in Australia (2003/4) and thought I had paid everything of.

 

I am not sure how they got my FIL address but they are getting letters from Lowell even though I have never lived there! He has sent a letter/email about sending them to court as I don't live there.

 

I am not sure what I should do first, I have been reading alot around Lowell and they seem dodgy.

 

First, I need to let them know that I don't live in the UK so they don't hasle my FIL and then try and ensure that I owe this debt.

 

Pleae can someone advise me on the next steps I should take.

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

 

JoeTheMan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi JoeTheMan,

 

If you're disputing the whole debt, send lowell this 'prove it' letter courtesy of CB:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Amend to suit, do not sign, print your name, send recorded and keep a copy with your postal reciept. Add a line about them breaching OFT guidlines and the CPUTR 2008 by contacting a third party ;)

 

Good luck and best wishes from an Aussie/Welsh lady stuck in Wales 'til graduation :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

 

How would this work while I am in Australia?

Do I have to give my real address over here in OZ even though the debt is in the UK?

 

How would this effect the FIL or other family (which I have never lived at, part from as a child)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your FIL or any other member of your family get harassed by lowell, report them to Trading Standards and the OFT fro breaching OFT guidlines and the CPUTR 2008. Your FIL should make a complaint straight away.

 

You don't need to do a CCA request yet. Wait for the reply from the 'prove it' letter I posted above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not save yourself a quid and just ignore them?? There's absolutely nothing they can do unless a CCJ already existed before you left the UK, and you were aware of the action.

 

Your FIL has made a big mistake opening your letters and an even bigger one making contact with Lowell. The sensible thing to do, as you don't live at that address, is just put everything through the shredder without even opening it. They could try to get judgement by default if they have an enforceable agreement (highly unlikely) but it won't be worth the paper it's written on.

 

They are a third party with whom you have never had an agreement or acknowledged and accepted their factoring service. Just ignore the parasitic s..te bags.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you send the 'prove-it' by email, enable the option to get a delivery receipt and a read receipt (assuming your mail software gives you these options). Keep these receipts in your mailbox in case they dispute receiving it.

 

The CCA can only go by post as it is useless without the payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's a bit worrying about all this, is that you will have to give Lowell an address at some point to get a copy CCA, or go through the complaints procedure.

 

If you use your address in Oz, the threats will continue but they can never actually do anything.

If you use an address in UK (of relatives), they are likely to go for judgment by default which can then be used in an Oz court for enforcement of judgement under the reciprocal agreement. A case you'd probably win eventually if you know what to do - but hassle most people could well do without.

 

You signed a CCA'74 in which S141 states it is enforceable only in a UK County or High Court. This agreement is not, and never has been, between you and the Lowell Group because they are a third party purchaser 'offering' a factoring service, so why acknowledge any involvement by them in the first place?? They can only act if they get a response from you, positive or negative.

 

It's probably very close to being SB, and will have been settled by the taxman shortly after you left the UK if you did your IR paperwork......why let these turds get involved in the first place, wouldn't it be better to just ignore them??

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thank you for the info. What does SB mean?

I have never planned to amy address in the UK but the FIL decided to open my mail!

 

If I don't respond, they will simply go after FIL for the money in the UK, or am I wrong here?

 

Can I give them a Post Office box or do have to give out my address?

 

Thank yoi

Link to post
Share on other sites

SB = Statute Barred. Once the debt has been dormant for six years they can not take you to court for it. If you left UK in Jan 2003 you must be very close to it by now anyway - all the more reason to give Lowell the heave ho (unless you want to pay them voluntarily of course) bearing in mind they paid literally a few pence for it.

 

They can't do anything to your FIL - or anyone else unless they were a party to the contract. The threats will continue which can quite safely go in the shredder. Only official court docs need a response - but it's extremely unlikely that will happen. Opening your mail was a mistake - contacting Lowell is a catastrophe!!

 

I'm a bit mystified why you are so keen to give them your address at all. It's nothing to do with them. They bought a soon to be SB debt for pennies and now hope to bully someone into paying. This time they lose out - but that's the risk they take.....unless you want to pay them voluntarily.

 

Take a look at Pblackie's " lowell taking me to court" thread and note their court bundle even included a full printout of his thread on CAG. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/117579-received-county-court-claim-9.html

 

Is it really a good idea to get involved with these "people" - if you are not even a UK resident??

 

It's up to you.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why my FIL is not pleased at all and I don't want to break this releationship, if it was someone that I did not care about then would not give my address or a PO Box address out.

 

I think it will be better to give a PO Box address over here in OZ and then it gets them way from FIL.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I sent them a "Prove-it" letter about 7 days ago, which I got a email confirmation back from them (auto-response) but I have not heard anything from them, what should I do next?

 

Thanks,

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...