Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My debt... more from the dreaded HFO Services *** Discontinued ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Also tell OFT about the photos of your home.

 

Can you also scan any documents sent you prior to issuing the Claim

 

It sounds like the CCA documents sent you - illegible application form etc are also suspect - where there any Terms and Conditions with it?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Firstly, apologies for starting a new thread! Hopefully these can be merged. I will post this here and then move over to the old thread here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?150311-My-debt...-more-from-the-dreaded-HFO-Services.../

 

POC is as follows:

 

Claimant: HFO CAPTIAL LIMITED

 

Particulars of Claim

 

 

  1. The Claimant is engaged in the business of purchasing debt and purchases debt from various lenders. The Claimant's group company, HFO Capital Limited, incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with company registration number MC-138277 (“HFO Cayman”), purchased the Defendant's account and all rights and benefits attaching thereto from Barclaycard (“The Original Lender”) on 6 November 2007.
  2. The Defendant's account was subsequently transferred to the Claimant pursuant to an intra-group sale agreement dated 31 January 2008.
  3. The Claimant's claim is for monies owed under an interest bearing credit agreement dated 23 March 1999 (“The Credit Agreement”), which is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, between the Defendant and the Original Lender, the debt due there under having been assigned to the Claimant.
  4. Under the Credit Agreement the said sum was to be repaid by the Defendant by way of monthly instalments. The Defendant has defaulted on payment and is in breach of the payment clause of the Credit Agreement.
  5. In compliance with Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the Defendant was given written notice of the assignment of the Defendant's account to the Claimant.
  6. Despite numerous requests made by the Claimant's collection agents the Defendant has failed to pay the said sum and remains indebted to the Claimant.
  7. The Claimant is entitled to claim contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment being at a daily rate of £0.48.
  8. The Claimant is entitled to claim post judgment contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum.
  9. Alternatively, pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate if 8.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment.

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

 

 

 

  1. Principle sum of XXXXXX
  2. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of assignment to date of issue in the sum of XXXXX.
  3. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of issue to date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.48.
  4. Or in the alternative, statuatory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 to be assessed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bl**dy hell where have you been!
Hi again! I will give HFO/TR one thing... they are tenacious.

 

OK, POC is as follows:

 

Claimant: HFO CAPTIAL LIMITED

 

Particulars of Claim

 

 

  1. The Claimant is engaged in the business of purchasing debt and purchases debt from various lenders. The Claimant's group company, HFO Capital Limited, incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with company registration number MC-138277 (“HFO Cayman”), purchased the Defendant's account and all rights and benefits attaching thereto from Barclaycard (“The Original Lender”) on 6 November 2007.
  2. The Defendant's account was subsequently transferred to the Claimant pursuant to an intra-group sale agreement dated 31 January 2008.
  3. The Claimant's claim is for monies owed under an interestlink3.gif bearing credit agreement dated 23 March 1999 (“The Credit Agreement”), which is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, between the Defendant and the Original Lender, the debt due there under having been assigned to the Claimant.
  4. Under the Credit Agreement the said sum was to be repaid by the Defendant by way of monthly instalments. The Defendant has defaulted on payment and is in breach of the payment clause of the Credit Agreement.
  5. In compliance with Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the Defendant was given written notice of the assignment of the Defendant's account to the Claimant.
  6. Despite numerous requests made by the Claimant's collection agents the Defendant has failed to pay the said sum and remains indebted to the Claimant.
  7. The Claimant is entitled to claim contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment being at a daily rate of £0.48.
  8. The Claimant is entitled to claim post judgment contractual interest pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 12.00% per annum.
  9. Alternatively, pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate if 8.00% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of judgment or sooner payment.

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

 

 

 

  1. Principle sum of XXXXXX
  2. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of assignment to date of issue in the sum of XXXXX.
  3. Contractual interest on (1) above from date of issue to date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.48.
  4. Or in the alternative, statuatory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 to be assessed.

Since they refer to "credit agreement dated 23 March 1999" and have never provided me with such I assume this is what I should be asking for under the CPR31?

 

The fuzzy application forms they have provided (see here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?150311-My-debt...-more-from-the-dreaded-HFO-Services...&p=1761879&viewfull=1#post1761879) are dated 15.3.99 and so clearly NOT the credit agreement they refer to in their POC.

 

In answer to dadofholly: "Did HFO recentley send you a Default Notice prior to the court proceedings? if so can you scan it - If it is like others i have seen it will not be compliant - and after the Brandon appeal today the Court cannot enforce the debt on the back of a faulty DN."

 

In Sept 2010 I received a copy of PAGE 1 of a Default Notice - it is dated 9 Sept 2005 but there is no logo or letterhead indicating who sent and the bottom of the page says "(continued)" however the rest of the letter is missing. I will scan this in properly tomorrow, as I don't currently have a scanner at home!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shadow.

 

Coledog: thanks for your suggested CPR31 - amazing. This will be sent off tomorrow, and I'll call BC, and contact Polly at OFT.

 

A quick question - what if TR don't send me the requested documents within 7 days, and my Defense is due? Presumably I can request more time?

 

Thanks again everyone, I really can't thank you enough for your quick responses. This is a huge weight lifted for this evening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES... once you have sent the document give them a day to receive it and phone them... demand they give you an extension of 14 days AFTER they have sent you their response and seek that agreement in writing. If they say they wont agree to an extension warn them you will apply to the court and seek the application costs from them.

 

Once you get the agreement in writing advise the court by letter so they know too.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. CPR31 letter sent today special delivery.

 

I spoke to Barclaycard on the phone who confirmed that the last payment was on 6th July 2007; and that the debt was purchased by HFO Capital on 23rd October 2007 (a date different to ones they refer to in their POC). Barclaycard will provide me this info in writing, within 21 days. SAR request to BC will go out this week.

 

I have also spoken to someone at OFT and have been asked to provide a Witness Statement for use in their ongoing investigation of HFO/TR.

 

Any advice based on the info BC have given me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made a formal CCA Request - and if so do you have evidence of this?

 

This was the first thing I did, over 3 years ago. They have never been able to supply me with a true copy of the agreement (see previous posts).

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. CPR31 letter sent today special delivery.

 

I spoke to Barclaycard on the phone who confirmed that the last payment was on 6th July 2007; and that the debt was purchased by HFO Capital on 23rd October 2007 (a date different to ones they refer to in their POC). Barclaycard will provide me this info in writing, within 21 days. SAR request to BC will go out this week.

 

I have also spoken to someone at OFT and have been asked to provide a Witness Statement for use in their ongoing investigation of HFO/TR.

 

Any advice based on the info BC have given me?

 

Did you record the call? If not jot down everyhting you recall from the call - name of person you spoke to, time and date etc.

 

Also ask if BC can supply you with that in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Odd for Barclaycard to sell a debt just three months after the last payment... did you find out when they claim to have issued a DN?

 

Just to clarify, I had actually missed quite a few payments and was contacted by Wescot (I think - need to confirm this) in 2007 who said they were basically the debt collection side of BC. I made a couple of payments to them, and the date of July 2007 will likely be my last payment to them.

 

The reason why I did not make any further payments is because I was waiting for them to send me some documentation, which they never did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, call made. TR said they will go back to the claimant and request copies of all the documents I have asked for and will also grant an extension of time for my defense, though they were unable to confrm any exact dates over the phone, they did say they will confirm this in writing next week.

 

They also said that the CPR request I am making does not apply to small claims court, but they will provide the information anyway.

 

So, my question now: my current defense due date is Wednesday 2nd, if I do not receive written confirmation from TR granting an extension before the 2nd, what do I do? I presume I must write to the court and explain that I have been granted an extention but am waiting for written confirmation from the claimant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, call made. TR said they will go back to the claimant and request copies of all the documents I have asked for and will also grant an extension of time for my defense, though they were unable to confrm any exact dates over the phone, they did say they will confirm this in writing next week.

 

Hang on – TR actually runs HFO Services’ operations, and HFO is the agent for HFO Capital – they are one and the same. They simply have to switch computer screens. Fibs. Remember, when you get the agreement to extension it’s up to YOU to advise the court.

 

They also said that the CPR request I am making does not apply to small claims court, but they will provide the information anyway.

 

Since when do HFO or TR decide the track? That’s up to the judge. Call them back and make clear that until a judge decides, the case is effectively multitrack and CPR 31 does apply. They are misleading you as to the true legal situation.

 

So, my question now: my current defense due date is Wednesday 2nd, if I do not receive written confirmation from TR granting an extension before the 2nd, what do I do? I presume I must write to the court and explain that I have been granted an extention but am waiting for written confirmation from the claimant?

 

Did you record the call? You MUST call them back and INSIST they email confirmation of an extension to you so you can advise the court. DO NOT TRUST THEM. If they refuse, say that it is not good enough, and you will be seeking a court order for them to produce the documents under CPR – which will incur costs for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...