Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disabled vehicle towed away.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5161 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My car was towed away last night, I had to pay £345 (cash) to get it back today.

I had a disabled badge on show as my partner who was in the car at the time is disabled.

I was on the understanding that it is illegal to remove or clamp a disabled vehicle?

 

The clamping company insisted that it was not on show when they towed it away.

I pointed it out to them when i collected the car, it had slid to the side of the dash, and the clock was on the floor, It had slid when they lifted my car onto the truck. they then said it was not valid as the clock was not on show.

 

 

 

The clamping sign where my car was parked was on the floor as the glue was still wet and it had fallen off, so im thinking they only just put the sign up AFTER i parked.

I have parked in the same place for the past year without problems and there was never a warning about parking

 

The £345 was bad enough but the inconvenience of getting a disabled person home without transport was worse.

 

They say i can appeal within 14 days, and they say they have photographic evidence that i did not display a disabled badge, which is impossible.

 

I had to pay the cost as i needed to retrieve my partners medication which was in the car,, also they were going to charge £40 per day storage.

 

 

Any info as what i should do next please?

The company is called Midway Parks Birmingham

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmmm.

 

Yes, you cant tow, clamp or otherwise immobilise a vehicle displaying a disabled badge.

 

Since this seems to be a private company:

 

Was the clamper and tow agent wearing their SIA badges clearly.

 

Did the reciept they give you have their SIA badge numbers on.

 

If so, I'd complain directly to the SIA, as this type of thing will loose them their badge.

 

If you couldnt see their SIA badges, and theres no number on the reciept - you may of been scammed by unlicensed clampers.

 

I would do some research - google the company name, look on companies house to get the registered address and company information, and then write to them demanding your money back.

 

99% of clamping companies take phots to prove there was no permit displayed / no damage to vehicle - so their photos will prove that there was a badge displayed.

 

I do wonder if these people are properly licensed - what clamper would risk their badge (and all the easy money it brings in with it) over a disabled badge clearly displayed.

All opinions & information are the personal view of the poster, and are not that of any organisation, company or employer. Any information disclosed by the poster is for personal use only. Permission to process this data under the Data Protection act is NOT GIVEN to any company, only personal readers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advise, how do i get hold of SIA to complain?

This is a definite breach of the SIA regulations. The SIA can be contacted at www.thesia.org.uk. You can also make a complaint to the police and/or use crimestoppers.

 

You have definite recourse via the small claims court to recover your money.

 

There is a clamping guide in the stickies section which will give you more information.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a letter giving them 14 days to refund or you'll take them to court.

 

If they don't and give you BS about how they're in the right, send them a 2nd letter, called letter before action, giving them another 14 days. At the end of the 14 days, sue.

 

Vehicle Immobilising - Security Industry Authority

 

 

 

In addition to holding a valid SIA licence, vehicle immobilisers must observe the following requirements:

  1. A vehicle must not be clamped / blocked / towed if:
    • a valid disabled badge is displayed on the vehicle.

Unless they have proof that your disabled badge was not being displayed, (forget the clock, there's nothing that says the clock has to be on display on the SIA rules), they are going to have a hard time to show the judge they acted lawfully.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice. I have sent them a letter today out

lining the points raised on here.

I noticed that the receipt they gave me has the location of where my car was towed from, as the wrong street to where it was parked.

 

I checked out there Sia liscence number on line and it came back as valid.

 

Ill wait and see if i get a response, if not ill take it to the small claims after i report them to the SIA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

An update on this:

 

I took Midway Parks to court and won.

They were told to repay me any money they had taken. They never did so the bailiffs were instructed to collect it.

They said that there was nothing of any value at the premises to remove.

 

So it looks like these guys win no matter what the outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update on this:

 

I took Midway Parks to court and won.

They were told to repay me any money they had taken. They never did so the bailiffs were instructed to collect it.

They said that there was nothing of any value at the premises to remove.

 

So it looks like these guys win no matter what the outcome.

 

They can't wriggle our of a "Contempt of court charge" which can carry a jail sentence. Find out of you can pursue that line somehow and make it really awkward for them. As it may be a court issue ther should not be any further costs involved. You just have to find the right buttons to press.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update on this:

 

I took Midway Parks to court and won.

They were told to repay me any money they had taken. They never did so the bailiffs were instructed to collect it.

They said that there was nothing of any value at the premises to remove.

 

So it looks like these guys win no matter what the outcome.

 

was the judgement against the bailiff company or the bailiff ? if it was the company what was the company name ? I cannot find a Midway Parks company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the tow truck would be registered to them and you could get an attachment on it. Perhaps observe the compound and take note of the registration number of any tow truck bringing in a car.

 

It may be registered to them, but you can be sure that some other entity is the owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be registered to them, but you can be sure that some other entity is the owner.

 

Well they would have to have a valid receipt for the tow truck as the V5 is not proof of ownership.

 

All a V5 proves is that they are the registered keeper.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The summons would have been against the company and not the individual owner so if the truck belongs to the company it could be a legitimate catch. If it is on lease then another story but if it is impounded the owner will need to come out of hiding. Of course the other way could be to apply to have the company shut down due to contempt of court and other issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...