Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax/Lawson Maclaine - Telling me can only be sorted with a visit from them...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5751 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent them this letter ...

 

'DOORSTEP COLLECTION VISIT – PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

 

 

 

I refer to your recent correspondence regarding a fee I was charged for an appointment which I cancelled 2 hours after it was made.

 

I note it is your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and civil action will be taken.'

 

And today recieved this reply.

 

'We are in reciept of your letter. As mentioned you had made an appointment with ourselves which was later cancelled. Unfortunately the bailiff still attended the property. You have advised you do not wish to make an appointment with ourselves, however we are acting on behalf of the council to collect the above outstanding debt.

 

As you are aware, paying for council tax is a priority debt and must be cleared to avoid commital proceedings commencing. If you are refusing to make an appointment to set an arrangement then full payment must be made directly to this office within 7 days, otherwise we will have no choice but to return the case back to the council for further action'

 

I have also sent letter to the council. I await their reply & have continued paying £5 per week towards the debt as per the original arrangement.

 

I hope it all works out ok.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

mm this is weird. I have recieved a letter today from Lawson Maclaine. It sais 'notice to levy distress for council tax'

The weird thing is it sais

 

'TAKE NOTICE That by virtue of an authority given to me by the above Council I have this day attempted to seize and distrain on the premises situated at the above address shown above for the goods specified in the following Inventory for the sum due for the arrears and costs under the liability order issued to the council in the Magistrates court.

NAD TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that unless the said amounts be paid inclusive of all the costs and charges of this Distress, from the date here of, the goods listed below will be distrained upon/removed from the premises and sold according to the law'

 

And then there is an inventory below that is empty :-?

 

And then there is a form for me to sign called 'Form Of Walking Posession Agreement (Request To Not Remove Goods)'

 

Why have they sent this to me if they sent me a letter previous saying the debt would be sent back to the council?

Will this nightmare ever end???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peepo, if you are out of work and claiming benefit, for example jobseekers, then contact the council again and inform them of this and tell them you want them to take payment for the arrears directly from you benefit. This is approx £3.00 per week. The bailiff is trying to scare you with the letter they have left. They could take goods if they had been into your home to list them and you had signed an agreement but this is not the case and therefore the letter is worthless. Make sure your car is not available for them to clamp though if you have one. Remember they can only charge you for two visits and that is it, just dont let them in and dont sign anything. If on benefits and the council wont agree to taking payment from your benefit, pay them the equivelant so this proves you are not avoiding paying.

 

Good luck

 

Billy

Link to post
Share on other sites

oke I will call them again. I always end up talking to the same guy though & hes obstructive & refuses to admit that they could stop all this & that its wrong Im being treated this way when they could just take it out of my benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peepo, follow the call up with a brief letter if they refuse again. Just explain that further to the telphone calls with ***** I would like to offer payment again via my jobseekers allowance as you are able to take this directly from benefit. I have enclosed a cheque/postal order for £3.00 which is roughly the equivalent amount and will continue to pay this directly to you every week until you have organised payment direct from my jobseekers allowance.

 

Thank you

 

 

Then leave it with them. You are paying, they can get it direct if they want and there is nothing more that you can do if a judge were to look at the sitation. Just remember to pay regularly.

 

Good luck

 

Billy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I recieved a call from the council today. The purpose of the call was to tell me to stop sending them letters, because the matter is in the hands of bailiffs & they dont want to know.

 

So it would appear this matter is not going to be resolved quickly. I cant believe they called to tell me that. Im really starting to lose my patience over this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recieved a call from the council today. The purpose of the call was to tell me to stop sending them letters, because the matter is in the hands of bailiffs & they dont want to know.

 

They're just trying to fob you off.

They could deal with you- they just don't want to because they can't be bothered.

MAKE them bothered.

Write to them, call them, pay a personal visit to their one-call shop.

Make an absolute pest of yourself and eventually, they'll HAvE to deal with you, just to make you go away.

Cause work for them, they're generally lazy and are used to people caving in under pressure from the bailiffs.

It's what I did, and the problem has gone away without me having to pay them a penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...