Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

returning to education, how will this effect benefits? Help needed please.


nickismee80
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5824 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey ya.. I hope this is in the right place...

 

Could anyone tell me if benefits are effected if i return to college. My partner works 16-20 hours a week, we receive CTC, WTC, CB, housing and coucil tax benefits.

 

I have my interview with the tutor later this month, but if our income is effected, there is now way i could do the course, so no point me going to the interview.

 

I have had a look around the net, but i can't find any site which explains this.

 

I hope some of you can help me out..

 

Many thanks

 

Nicki

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi nickismee80,

 

Are you going as a student or an employee ?? sorry that is not very clear.

 

If you go back as an employee your CB will be unchanged that is standard.

CTC & WTC will have tolerances that you need to be aware of, in this case going above a certain amount could reduce your award. You need to check your award notice to see how and when you need to tell HMRC if your income increases.

 

Housing and Council tax benefits will be the most likely affected, so you need to contact them to ask how much your potential new income will effect your current benefits.

 

BB

Edited by BeauBrummie
Words in twice !!!!!

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be going back as a full time student...

 

So what or who has given you the impression that your benefits will be effected??

 

BB

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I returned to study in 1999 when I was a lone parent on income support, my benefits were not affected in any way, even though childcare and petrol were reimbursed by the college.

I also returned to study (again) in 2003 and worked and this did not affect my benefits either, however I wasn't claiming HB or CTB this time.

Hope this helps somewhat, I think you may need to declare student loan/grant/bursary in the case of HB or CTB but not sure on that one (surely if income has not changed then neither will these benefits).

Out of personal interest, what are you going back to study?

Edited by Chickenlicken
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are not earning any money at the moment that the benefit awards were based on then I dont think you have anything to worry about.

 

Happy Learning

 

BB

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of personal interest, what are you going back to study?

 

 

Im going to study btec 1st diploma in sport, then on to the higher qualification as i want to be a fitness instructor. Im still doubting whether i can do it, im 27, mum to 3.. but i am quite fit and active (train in tae kwon-do) so im hoping the age bit won't go against me.. i can imagine it.. learning with a class full of teenagers!! For once, im glad i still look 17.. hehe..

 

Anyways.. thank you for all your help.. also, i didnt realise the college could reinburse for petrol etc.. will have to look in to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on your qualifications, maybe a National Dip. would be better suited? then Higher National? ND worth 2 'a' levels and a good starting point.

Funding is a grey area as it depends on area & college. With regards to petrol it was through ESF (European Social Fund). There is the £30 learning grant you could apply for from the gov.

Also, a student loan is only available to FT Higher Ed students. I managed to get a learning grant when I did my HNC as wasn't eligible for stu loan because officially it was a part time course.

For 1st Dip. grants maybe limited as you should be able to have the course fully funded anyway.

 

Good luck and keep us posted!

 

& btw I returned to study as a mature student too. Best thing I ever did

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done a 1st dip in public services, but that was 10 years ago.. i got a pass grade, so im not sure if i do have the qualifications to do a national dip.. my GCSE grades are not very good.

 

Will go to the interview and see what the tutor says.. if i can jump to the nat dip it will save on a year worth of study!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to jumb in Nikki, I also thought benefits were affected if you became a FT student!! I was on long term incapacity benefit before i became a student but I stoped claiming once i was enrolled. I study for pleasure as I will never be able to work due to my illness and like you was also a mature student, are people saying i could have carried on claiming!! please say no.lol.

 

Good Luck!!

 

Pen x

Edited by Pen

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CTB,WTC, CT & HB, will not be affected as they are calculated on household income. If you are earning nothing now and continue to do the same then there should be no difference in the amount you receive.

 

JSA is affected if you return to full time education as you are no longer available for work during the hours you are at college.

 

Good Luck with the course - maybe you would like to give some tips over here Fitness Health Support Group - Consumer Health Forums

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...