Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equita Bailiff help required they have clamped my car!!!!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I hope someone can help me here.

 

I have been fighting with equita about payment of a number of parking fines recently and today they have clamped my car and the debt has goe from £200 to £1100 to take the clamp off.

 

I have explained to them that I filed the statutory declaration with the councils and when i called them last week this was approved. So why are they still clamping my car?

 

On another fine I agreed to pay it off in instalments i have paid these online and have got the proof for these as well but they are now saying that there is extra to pay. WHen I ring Equita they say to ring the bailiff and when I ring him he is very aggressive and rude and doesnt want to know. When I asked about the extortionate charges he said that he could do what he likes.

 

I need my car for business and everyday i dont have my car im losing money but I have follwoed all the right steps to stop this happening but they are not playing fair.

 

Can anyone help???

 

Regards

 

Siddy 1978

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the wheel off and put the spare on.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lamma

 

My mistake I filed the stat dec which was the PE3 AND PE2 forms with the traffic enforcement centre in northampton. The ticket relates to stopping in a red zone. I did not get any of the letters.

 

I have explained this to Equita but they are not budging I cannot ring up tec as they were closed when bailiff clamped car. They actually went in to my secure car park when someone was leaving to do it.

 

Will I have to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the car on private land or on the public highway? If it's on private land then unless they have had court authority, they have commited trepass. You would be well within your rights to get the old angle grinder out and chomp through it, as well as taking them to court for trepass, loss of use of car etc etc... I'm kinda hoping it's on private land (ie. a driveway or something).

 

Someone with bailiff knowledge will surely pop in and take a look at your problem, so hang in there, and good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are more informed clamping experts than I on here..

 

can you supply dates etc ?

this secure car park is it at your home address ? IAUI the bailiff's warrant will only allow him to 'operate' at your home address.

what makes it secure - was he trespassing to do this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gold lady

 

I thought about taking the wheel off but the clamp covers all entrances to the wheel nuts now

 

Didn't mean to sound cheeky but friends of mine did that once.:D

 

I hope you get it sorted - the fact that they busted into the car park is well out of order but difficult to argue when there is a clamp in the way.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for replying. The car park is part of the development i live in it is a multistorey car park on private land.

 

Dates are as follows.

 

I received a letter from equita at the end of February regarding payment requested and how bailiffs were going to knock on my door unless i paid.

 

I called up and agreed to pay monthly instalments over four months for all three fines this was at the beginning of March. They agreed and I have been paying online.

 

In the meantime I filed the stat decs on the 18th March and was told that action would be suspended. I still carried on paying as i was still receiving letters. I still havent heard from tec.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi goldlady

 

i am going to get someone over tomorrow to see if we can take the clamp off somehow or the wheel. would this be illegal?

 

The reason i ask is that I use the car two days a week to take my mum to hopsital who is disabled and my car is congestion exempt.

Edited by siddy1978
missed out info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like trepass then to me. As for them telling you they can do what they like, they like to think they are above the law, but trepass is trepass, and an offence! I would call, fax (if you can) and write to them telling that they have trepassed onto private land, and will be suing them, which you should do, as well, as any monetary compensation for loss of use of the vehicle.

 

We really need somebody with the knowledge though to come and help you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i said, if its on private land, you can do what you want with the clamp.. do you have an angle grinder? I'm sure they would call the police for backup, but then they wouldnt want to know anyway.. if its private land, so they either unclamp you, or you grind it off. Might be an idea to call them to tell them of your intentions too. Lets see them try to argue that one!! (and take a note of any PC's number, if it comes to them getting involved).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys im going to be ringing TEC first thing to see if I can get it sorted. Im leaving the country fo rten days on thursday and i dont want it to get towed away whilst I am away.

 

If it is trespassing then i will definitely sue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...If it is trespassing then i will definitely sue.

 

... and so you should, for more than you owe preferably, so that it's paid off, and you have some spare cash in your pocket, and they have a lot less in theirs!!

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know when my friends took their clamp off they made sure it was undamaged and then wrote to the company (not bailiffs just a private rip off firm) and told them where it was available for collection. Not sure where you would stand if you took an angle grinder to it.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah true but someone has just sent me this link which is exactly what I am fighting. I didnt get the fines for this but this is what they were trying to get me done for. Looks like I may definitely have a case

 

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23416834-details/Motorist%27s+victory+over+%C2%A31m+traffic+spy+camera/article.do

 

The Online Petition: http://search.petitions.pm.gov.uk/kbroker/number10/petitions/search.lsim?ha=1157&sc=number10&qt=matt+briggs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goldlady, the only recourse the clampers would have if its on private land is to sue for the value of the clamp. They could "try" for criminal damage, but who invited them onto the land where they clamped the vehicle anyway?

 

If the OP sues as it was private land, then the clampers could only counterclaim for the value of the clamp at most. If the clampers sued first, then the defence is trespass in the first place, IMO. Howevr, i'm no expert in clamping and the law relating to that, so...

 

The point is, who invited them or allowed them onto the private land?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Angle grinders at dawn then. I bl**dy well would;)

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...