Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson Way chasing old debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5439 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am new to this forum and could do with some good advice please?

Robinson and Way & Co.

In January 2001 My partner took out a loan with HFC we made one payment and then defaulted. We are not sure whether we contacted them in that time with an Income and Expenditure form. We forgot all about it as we moved around a few times. Then two weeks ago they found us, we think through applying online for other loans. My partner had a default against his name for this, which has since been removed due to the time scale. They have now sent us a Court N9A form. The amount owing was £8805.88 for a £5000 loan, they have since decided to add another £5161.09 as interest plus daily intrest of £1.93. They want to take us to court which will also be a court fee £190 plus Solicitors costs of £100. As this is debt is so old can they do this? Also we have only had a couple of weeks notice from the first letter to the Court letter. I know I am not much help but we really cant remember when we had or if we had any correspondence a few years ago so we are not sure if we agreed to pay an agreed sum.

Thankyou so much for any help in advance.

FP.

Edited by Floppy Poppet
bad spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi FP

 

Welcome to CAG

 

So the last communication you had with anyone about this debt was in 2001?

 

If that is the case you can tell them to get lost because it is time barred under section 5 of the Limitations Act 1980.

 

I think you should try and find old correspondence if you can as dates could be important here.

 

I'm moving this post to a new thread so help to you doesn't get mixed up with van's

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven,

Thanks for replying so quickly. We cant find anything, but then again I am no secretary and very un organised in the letter department. Stupid I know but it has been so long we really cannot remember if we have had any contact with them. Is there any way we could find out, tho not wanting to alert them?

Thanks

FP

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have contacted you so they are already alerted.

 

Send them letter 'N' from http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

In the first sentence add the word 'alleged' before the first occurence of the word 'agreement' and, at the end of the first sentence, add:

plus a statement of account signed on behalf of Robinson Way and showing:

 

(a) the total sum paid under the alleged agreement by me;

 

(b) the total sum which has become payable under the alleged agreement by me but remains unpaid, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date when each became due; and

 

© the total sum which is to become payable under the alleged agreement by me, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date, or mode of determining the date, when each becomes due.

At the top of the letter (above the 'dear sir') centred and in bold "I do not acknowledge any debt to your company"

 

This will show if they have any right to collect the debt - if they have a copy of the agreement (if they haven't, they cannot collect on it) and if there have been any payments in the last 6 years (if there haven't been then it is time barred)

Edited by steven4064
  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait until you get something in writing back from RWC. If the statements they are obliged to provide show that in fact NO payment was made for a period of six years then tis alleged debt is Statute Barred and cannot be enforced through ANY courts

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

You said that you got a n9a form - did you get this from the court?

 

It sounds as though you have already admitted the debt.

 

Have you had anything before this form from the court saying that a claim was being made against you.

 

You need to respond to court forms in time otherwise they can get a default judgment made against you regardless of the fact that it might be statute barred

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to ask, has the n9a form been completed in the top right hand corner with name of court and claim number?

 

If it has then that means that they have issued a claim against you in the court.

 

Only complete form n9a if you admit the debt.

 

You should have received a claim form as well. Could you type up what it says in the box called Particulars of Claim (leaving out any personal information)

 

This should also give you some information on what to do:-

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/ex303.pdf

Edited by nicklea
added link
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicklea,

All we were sent was a letter from RWC on the 4/04/08, telling us that is was going to Court if not paid within 7 days. We have just applied online for a 28 day extension but they asked if we were fighting the whole claim, which we ticked yes. And yes the Court form has a claim number and Court name. I dont think we have much hope now, will we be stung for the whole amount of 14k? Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 18 letter :

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES S [ 18 ].

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I have received the Court claim filed by your Company. To enable me to file a defence and counter-claim, I require specific information regarding the account to be provided forthwith. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below. This letter supersedes the CCA request made to on the **DATE**. The information must be furnished by the **DATE**, which gives you ten days to provide what has been requested. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

a. A transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, repayments and payments and both the original amount of the loan and any repayments made to it the account.

b. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations

c. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with **CREDITOR**.

d. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

e. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

f. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

g. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

h. A genuine copy of any deed of assignment, or proof that you have a legal right to this money.

i. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

j. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

4. A copy of your complaints procedure, as required by the Consumer Credit Act 2006.

5. Clarification of the date you acquired the debt, what organisation you acquired it from, their registered office, their company number (if any) and what legal title they had to this debt, and what credit license number they had at the time that the debt was purchased or entered into.

 

I will require this information within the next ten days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

----

 

CCA request and statute barred letter are here :

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

Letters N and M

 

Send them by special delivery, do not sign any of these letters, make copies of all you send , add 'I do not acknowledge any debt to your company' at the top of the cca and statute barred letters .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beat me to it.

  • Haha 1

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder about this line thou :

 

"This letter supersedes the CCA request made to on the **DATE** "

 

Because you do not want it to supercede the cca request, you want it in addition to .

 

So, although that is the default cpr18 letter , if I were you i'd delete that line from the letter above or change it to :

 

"This letter is in accompaniment to the CCA request and statute barred notification made on the **DATE**

 

---

 

Don't worry that your asking for the cca twice, they do not have to supply the cca under the cpr unless the judge orders it, but under the cca request {s77/78} they have to comply . Don't need to fill in your defence yet if you acknowledge service but you need to send these 3 letters off asap.

 

 

oops. forgot . Use a postal order for the £1 stat fee for the cca req. No cheques .

Edited by Rahl
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rahl is right, as proceedings have started, you should send a Part 18 request. But you should add the wording from my post #4 after item 1. This will show whether any payments have been made within the 6 years (and what other charges may have been added) The wording is straight out of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Your CCA request should have the bits I added in post #4 for the same reasons

 

We also need to start thinking about your defence. The main points will be:

 

1. No LBA means that pre-action protocols were not followed (naughty, naughty)

 

2. No default notice means no right of action - they are not allowed to bring the cliam by virtue of s87 CCA 1974

 

3. No executed agreement means you are 'embarassed' because you haven't a clue what they are on about - they have not demonstrated cause of action

 

4. No assignment notice means they haven't shown they have the right to even collect the debt (who are these people anyway?)

 

5. No statement of account means you are embarassed because you have no idea where the amount of the claim comes from - they have not demonstrated cause of action

 

6. The amount probably contains some unlawful charges - these cannot be claimed from you unless they demonstrate they are lawful and that would mean HFC disclosing their costs (which they would die rather than do)

 

7. Possibly, the claim is over 6 years old anyway and is therefore statute barred

 

I think we can make a strong case on these grounds (we can base it on a pt2537 special :D)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rahl,

Thanks again. I know this sounds really dumb, but can I send all 3 letters in one envelope or 3 seperate ones? Thanks for the advice about not signing as we did!!! So we will remove those and no cheques.

FP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They were given their letters on the 3 rd of June, but we still have not heard anything? We have to return our court papers by the 24th of this month. I am not sure of what to do at the moment, any help please? Thanks.

Edited by Floppy Poppet
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

FP

 

I notice that you were given quite a bit of advice about what to send but I can't see what you actually sent in the end. WHat did you send to RW?

 

And the court papers you have to return by the 24th - is that your defence? If it is, you could do with getting that done now anyway withoutwaiting for RW to reply - they are completely ignorant and probably won't reply.

 

I outlined a defence in post #17

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven,

Thanks for replying. I was told to send 3 different letters (they are on the thread) Do you think I should just return the court papers? Do I add a note that RW have not contacted me in the 10 days they were given?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...