Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accused of shop lifting.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5861 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daught has been accused of shop lifting. She was hilding a couple a bottles of purfume in the same had as her hand bag and coat, she decided she did not want them and put them down in a different area of the store, but was stopped before leaving the store even though she had no goods on her person. She was frightened only being 16 and has adhd and started to run (still in the store) she was restrained by 2 security men, she struggled and had up to 7 people holding her including a policeman and it was very painful, before they let go and she calmed down. The two bottles of perfume were recovered from where she left them. The policeman was asked to look in her bag but found nothing.

She has been sent a demand for £137.

I rang the Manager ( one of the big department stores). The store security are saying that she put one bottle back after being caught and another was found in her bag on leaving the store. My daughters friends back up her story that this was a blatant lie. he also told me no one had ever made any complaints before, which I find hard to believe.

My question is ehat are her rights. No goods were found on her ( even though they are saying tere were). she had not actually left the store when she was stopped. it does not look like the police will procecute, but the store is trying to make a civel suit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The onus is on them to prove the theft. As no theft has taken place, this can't be done.

 

Is this TK Maxx / RLP?

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, its down to the store to prove it, but more importantly, I would demand that the store write to you with their version of events together with their written demand for £137. They just cant demand money from people! As the police were involved (but found nothing), I would ask for the policeman/woman to contact you or provide you with their version of events. If nothing was found by the police, who is the court going to believe??

 

I can understand you must be extremely angry about this, but don't worry. If anything was found, your daughter would be getting a summons for (criminal) court. However, the store is demanding that you hand over £137 instead. Hmmm.. something doesn't sound quite right.

 

Ignore the demand and let them chase you for it, right through to (civil) court if you have to. You then counter-claim, and blow their case out of the water, and also get monetary damages from them. If they are stupid enough to carry this through, you can call the policeman/woman as a witness, who will say, nothing was found.

 

Once you have something in writing from the store, I would fire off a letter to their head office demanding apologies, assurances that it will never happen again, etc etc.

 

 

I hope this helps in some small way.

 

Regards...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be VERY worthwhile to get a copy, behind the scenes as it were (don't let the store know it). And then you sue them. It's quite simple really. But to really make them squirm, let it run its course ie. the hassle of letters from debt collectors, solicitors etc etc. Admittedly, it may involve some up front cost, but hardly anything, in relation to what you will get in the way of damages. Trust me, they won't let it go as far as court, but they will settle out of court, for a tasty some of money no doubt. They won't let it go to court to protect any "reputation" they might still have left by that time, not to mention that there is no case anyway (other than trying to obtain money by deception, which is a criminal matter, but that is their lookout if they want to be so stupid as to even attempt it).THAT is when you will make the killing (and probably get a few people sacked too lol).

 

If they insist that you pay, that is when the fun will begin. Right now, there is diddly squat to worry about, other than the inconvenience of the inevitable hassle caused by all of this, and iniated by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being an ex retail manager (based in Oxford Street London) if a person picks up any item/s and leaves the store without paying for them, then that is theft.

 

However, if someone picks up an item and tries to hide it under their jumper and then replaces it back in the store, that is not theft.

 

HOW MANY OF US WATCH OLDER FOLK PLACING SHOPPING IN THEIR OWN SHOPING TROLLEYS THEN GET TO A CHECK OUT AND REMOVE THE ITEMS FROM THEIR OWN TROLLEYS AND PAY FOR THE GOODS?

 

THE RULE HAS ALWAYS BEEN... If you see someone shoplifting- you must see them pick up the item, hide the item, walk out without paying for the item! They must never be out of site!!!!

 

So if your daughter had nothing on her, then she has commited no crime.

 

Now assuming that she did think of stealing, then changed her mind, the fact that she was found to have nothing on her shows that- a) she out-smarted those watching her, b) those watching her were not watching her fully, c) She may have looked nervous whilst browsing and attracted suspition (which is no crime in itself).

 

My advice is same as other entries- Do not pay any money and ask for compensation.

 

 

It is worth noting though that prices for goods are higher due to theft, so we need to reduce theft to get lower prices!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi Denise,

 

Have used your real name rather than a alias, If so you could ask for it to be changed by a moderator.

 

What an ordeal for a young girl to go through, I hope she is not too traumatised.

You have received good advice here, and should get details as suggested from the police, you might consider a counter claim if the store take their threat further.

I wonder if your daughter is up to reporting the assault, because it was assault, I feel those involved must be made to face the consequences.

 

Regards

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Denise,

Have used your real name rather than a alias, If so you could ask for it to be changed by a moderator.

For security reasons, you are better not to use your real name. If you wish to change your username, then send a PM to any Moderator or Site Helper, stating what your alternative name is and we can change it for you.

 

Being an ex retail manager (based in Oxford Street London) if a person picks up any item/s and leaves the store without paying for them, then that is theft.

 

However, if someone picks up an item and tries to hide it under their jumper and then replaces it back in the store, that is not theft.

 

HOW MANY OF US WATCH OLDER FOLK PLACING SHOPPING IN THEIR OWN SHOPING TROLLEYS THEN GET TO A CHECK OUT AND REMOVE THE ITEMS FROM THEIR OWN TROLLEYS AND PAY FOR THE GOODS?

 

THE RULE HAS ALWAYS BEEN... If you see someone shoplifting- you must see them pick up the item, hide the item, walk out without paying for the item! They must never be out of site!!!!

 

So if your daughter had nothing on her, then she has commited no crime.

As gogivit said, until you actually walk out of the shop with the goods, you have committed no crime. You could pick up anything in the store and walk all round the place, but provided you put it down before you leave, it is not theft.

 

Personally, I would be looking down the path of assault by the shop's staff.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.

There have been many posts about stores seeking to try and recover costs following Police being called...TK Max being one.

Most of the larger stores would simply issue a banning order..they dont have to give reasons. Its their duty to prove their case if they want to take it to Court.If you continue to get demands for payment then use the procedures afforded to you under the Data protection act/and Office of fair trading.If they engage debt collectors then report it in the debt forums for guidance.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...