Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tilly V mortgage express repo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5712 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tills, you can take them up on their offer of a FREE valuation, but I'd have a seperate valuation done so you know exactly how much (if anything) you are giving up. Problem with the 75% situation, is that more and more analysts are predicting a downturn, some as much as 40%, so these companies may use that to justify a lower offer. Stay on your toes Lady.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tilly, i'm still around and full of admiration. I made enquiries with one of these companies a couple of years ago. I was certainly shocked at how little they offered. I suspect your gut instinct to be wary is right, but it's not worth leaving any stone unturned in this situation.

 

As an extreme long shot, i'm still hoping one of us will win the lottery :rolleyes:

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TILLY, PLEASE DON'T DO IT!!!!

I've been having a bit of a search, & I found this A Dangerous way to get out of DebtBasically it tells you that it's a WIN-WIN situation for them, & a NO-WIN situation for you. Please read the article before you commit to anything, & please be very careful around these companies, it seems as though they're like vultures towards people who are desperate to sell as quickly as possible.

 

Has anyone turned stone the right way up yet?

Edited by ja-de

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jade

 

Thanks flower, believe me i don't intend to commit to anything, :rolleyes: like hopefull said my gut instict tells me know. But thankyou for the link.

 

 

Tills

 

 

Ps stone is now up the right way

Link to post
Share on other sites

It must be lets get stone day again.

 

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jade your right, and i hope many posts on this thread will be helpfull to many people that find there selves in a simular situation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

peeps stop picking on stone :confused::D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was offered one of these and they took so long to get sorted out it didn't work out.

 

It is almost impossible to have a win-win situation for the home owner when repossession is instigated (and it isn't always as a last resort as they keep trying to tell you - one missed payment is all it takes these days - and there is plenty of evidence to support that about).

 

What would be sensible is for the mortgage lenders to have a scheme where they buy 25% of the NORMAL value of your home and that way everybody wins... you have some cash to pay off the arrears, and they could possibly keep the rest for three to six months before releasing the balance to you... what do other people think?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sg, I've heard of it many times in the past, where you 'Buy 2 Rent', but I don't think it applies to Tilly's case, as unfortunately I honestly don't think that the mortgage lenders would even contemplate (big word for me this early on Sunday) going down that road, now or in the future. Lets face it, they're far too busy trying to take all our money as it is. But I must agree with you, it's a reasonably good idea.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought Tils, Have you tried your local housing assn ? a couple in my area have been known to buy ex council houses back from the owners and leave them as sitting tenants when their local stock of properties has been low for peeps in similar situs to to yours.

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest guys, with a view to my current situation, i dont think i want to stay here any longer than i have too now, thats does'nt mean im giving up what i mean is staying until hopefully sell the house or get told leave. So i think the sell to rent is a non starter anyway.

Edited by **Tilly**
Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally understand what you're saying Tills, in the light of everything that's happened, no-one can blame you at all.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The housing market is so slow at the moment, i think i have seen 3 sold boards go up, but there are many for sale signs so im not alone there are loads of peeps trying to

do the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, unfortunately it's slow everywhere, & it won't help with all these rules & regulations they've started with. Certificates for windows, boilers, wiring, etc etc blah blah .............

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, unfortunately it's slow everywhere, & it won't help with all these rules & regulations they've started with. Certificates for windows, boilers, wiring, etc etc blah blah .............

 

 

Well im on the ball there jade i have all mine :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never doubted you Tills, one things for sure, no-one will manage to get one over on you hun, which is why we know that you can do this.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Tilly and everyone!!

 

I will make sure the info gets to you- still pursuing, but as you say and others have said previously, this sell to rent/ rent back does not look hopeful. It is doubtfull if ME would agree to the sale at such a discounted price in any case, unfortunately. Time is also an issue.

 

Stone, the H/A option to buy has been investigated as suggested in earlier posts. It would make sense if the Housing Corporation focussed more attention on this area for people in this situation. Unfortunately, it does not look like an option in Tillys area.

 

Immediate priority needs to be N244 updated and focussing on housing/ living arrangements.

 

Take care Tilly and ask any questions as you need to.

Edited by kennythecelt
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Kenny

 

Yes i agree with you on the sellt to rent, the n244 needs to be udated asap like you say being offline is not helping :evil:

The living arrangments at the moment are my daughter is going to stay with her brother, me with my sister not ideal i know, but at the moment have no choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck **Lilly**

 

Our thoughts are with you.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been looking at private rentals but here the rents start from 580.00 for a 1 bed flat upwards for houses, although i have sorted out other benefits, they wont give me housing benefit until im out of here :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tilly, there is something that has crossed my mind and that is the possession order. I'm wondering if at the moment you would be able to sell the house yourself as I'm not sure if technically and legally it is yours to sell. Although you still have access to it and are living there the order came into effect on 27th May.

 

If you got enough to cover the full debt it may not be a problem. If in reality you are unlikely to cover the full debt, and as you don't want to keep the house I'm beginning to wonder if the N244 is the best way to go.

 

Being totally realistic, if you are still likely to owe ME a very large amount of money after the house as sold, I'm wondering if you may be better to look at alternative ways of clearing the debt.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...