Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you to you all, you guys are amazing!! Yes of course i will be making a donation, i am very grateful to you all. Keep up the good work
    • I'm not quite out of the woods yet. The email they sent me also said that I have £290 of arrears and it has been passed onto their collections department. If anything my account should be £10 in credit.  They haven't taken into account the trainers that were returned back in October. The other items have been credited to my account so it looks like I've still got work to do.  They are not very quick to reply to emails, although I've only sent one trying to find more information, and I have no idea what happens next. Half of me want's to get it sorted properly the other half just wants it over with, if that means a default then so be it. 
    • No. It's a public (council maintained) road with some houses in it.   Some other houses back onto it too and those owners have right of way down the road to access the back of their properties.  Theres a few garages with private osp - so one drives out the garage, over the osp, and onto the public side road and then out on to the public main road.  Irrespective of whether the garages are used - the local businesses parking their cars on the private osp are ostensibly preventing cars from accessing the public roads.
    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty TV - Currys refusing to repair it


myxiplx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5886 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey folks, could I get some advice on where I stand with this please.

 

On 14/4/08 I bought a new 32" LCD TV from Currys. It's an ex display model so I got it at a good price, but was assured that it would still come with a full one year warranty. It looked a bargain but once we got it home we discovered that there's a faulty pixel glowing bright green in the center of the screen.

 

I phoned Currys the next day and they told me they could only offer a refund, but I didn't get very far as I'd forgotten to take the serial number in to work with me.

 

Well today I called again with the serial number and have been told that because it's ex display they won't repair or replace it at all, and my only option is a refund. Now I'm not particularly happy with this, it's not what I consider a warranty, and it's particularly galling when their exchange and refund policy stapled to my receipt states:

 

"We will always offer you the choice of an exchange or refund within twenty-eight days of delivery or collection."

 

Arguing with them over the phone has proved fruitless so far, but before I argue with them anymore I'd like to know whether I have an option to force them to repair this, and make Currys stand by their own terms and conditions?

 

PS. Anybody know how long Currys take to repair LCD TV's if I do get them to fix it? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine they are trying to get out of a repair as the TV was brought at a reduced price however it depends on if you were told there were a dead pixel at the time of the sale, and this was the reason for the reduction in price in that case I would imagine the goods would be sold as described.

 

One thing is certain, when manufacturers look at dead pixels they take into consideration where the dead pixels are, are they in the centre or near the outside edges of the screen, how many are present, if they are grouped together in a cluster or scattered.

 

Normally when you get one dead pixel you tend to get others grouping in a cluster, so my hubby says

 

I'm sure someone else will be along sooner who will know more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just taking into account their refund policy (I'm deliberately separating this from statutory rights), is there an exclusion relating to non-new goods? That's an asides.

 

s. 14 requires that goods be fit for purpose as described, reasonable quality etc. This also applies to second hand goods, ex-display etc, but expectations as to quality, durability etc should be reduced as it is ex-display. However, any faults must be drawn to your attention. It is insufficient to simply say "ex-display". That's another aside (but more relevant)

 

S. 5A of Sale of goods requires the seller to, in this order, repair, replace or refund, dependant on convenience and proportionateness of one remedy compared to the others. The buyer cannot demand a remedy which is unreasonable.

 

So, is repair unreasonable? Well, quite possibly. I don't know about TVs, but I can imagine that a repair in terms of cost would be unreasonable in comparison to a refund.

 

However, they have supplied the warranty which is additional to statutory rights. They should honour the terms of that warranty.

 

 

I personally would take the money and run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I wasn't told about any dead pixels on purchase, the reduction in price was simply because it was an ex display model. The warranty I have doesn't exclude ex-display models, and even their online warranty (Refunds Policy) states:

You will always have the option of an exchange or refund if the fault occurs within 28 days of delivery.
And again here: Main page refund policy
What happens if my item is faulty?

* Return a faulty product to a Currys store with your receipt or phone Aftersales on 0844 561 1234 to arrange a collection

* Any refund due to a fault will include a refund of the delivery charge you paid and our collection costs

* If there is a fault with your product within 28 days of delivery, you will always have the option of an exchange or refund

* If there is a fault with your product within 12 months of delivery, we will offer a prompt repair service

 

Personally I think they're trying to weasel out of it because it's outside of manufacturers warranty and it will cost them money to repair or replace. However that's their problem not mine. They sold it with a 12 month warranty, with terms and conditions clearly stated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again it will come down to reasonableness. They cannot be expected to pay £500 repairs on an item that costs £600. You need to establish that the cost of repairs is not disproportionate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My hubby says the dead pixel issue is an expensive repair as the whole lcd panel needs to be replaced, so as gyzmo quoted it would be best taking your money and doing a runner, as i think you only have so long to reject the goods and claim a refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...