Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Challenging the benefits office


IdaInFife
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

I am challenging my local benefits office.

 

Story:

 

My husband was hospitalised in Feb 2006 and basically told keep working at you current job and he wouldn't see 40 :eek:

 

He has always been a labourer and bascially there is somethiong wrong with his intestine ( something like having a stomach ulcer but in intentine) and was told heavy lifting and bending has caused this.

 

My husband was self employed and had been for many years. I always filled in his self return on time :grin: and paid his stamp when the invoice was sent.

 

I work 20 hrs a week but get a very good pay and bebifts from employer and we have a wee one so my works suits me.

 

In feb he went to the job centre and basically because he didn't pay voluntry contributions to his NI he doesn't get anything from them, never advised any different , just paid the quartley statuory invoices.

 

Tax credits advised at time.

 

Claimed for HB and CT benefits and was granted an award,

 

All good we think.

 

Have a random visit in Nov 2006 and got letter saying were we enitittled to nothing and left with nearly a £2000 overypayment. Called them up and they basically said "tough, we did not enter in your tax credits award , you are due us this money and we have taken it back".

 

So we have struggled since then until Nov 2007 when whilst discussing a housing application the Housing Officer,said that I should apply for HB and CT benefit and she thought we should be entitled to some form of rebate although aware of the previous application. We reapplied and were granted a partial rebate!

 

Had a another radom visit from the benefits office two weeks ago and everything is fine except when get the letter and we have a futher discount than what we have had 8-)

 

So from 2006:

 

Tax credits are the same

Rent and Ct has increased

My wages have increased

 

Does not make sense.

 

I have sent a letter to the benefits office today basically asking for a review of benefits from 2006.

 

I can only try ;-)

 

Any hints tips and critisisms welcome and will keep posting

 

Idax

Edited by IdaInFife
TO ADD

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR the council, it may not be of use now but it almost certainly will be if you have to take them to court or to a tribunal, when I had problems with a housing benefit overpayment the case came down to a hand written note on the front of a document the council was relying on, if I had not SARd them I wouldn't have had that vital piece of info that won me the tribunal.

.....of course I may be wrong!:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks,

 

I thought I would try the softly softly approach first.

 

I have a SAR ready to be pronted off if needed ;)

 

 

I am just awaiting their reply,

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say you sent a letter to the "benefits office" do you mean local council or DWP / Jobcentre? I ask only because you said that you paid your husbands conts when he was self employed and voluntary contributions should not have mattered (volutary contributions are only counted towards retirement pension as far as i know). So unless you know that there was a time in the three or four years preceeding you husbands illness when he was not working enough to pay conts or missed a quaterly payment it may be worth also writing to HMSO to check that conts were properly posted on their computer system and also the DWP to ensure that their decision to disallow Incapacity Benefit was correct.

.....of course I may be wrong!:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Frost,

 

He was self employed from 1999 but wasn't advised to still 'sign on' for his 'stamps' due to his earnings.

 

In 2002 started working as a sub contractor and paid the quartley invoices from then until he stopped working in 2006.

 

He is going back to the job centre this week to start a new claim.

 

And I wrote aleeter to the hb office, got an envelope today with all the paysips etc from 2006 but no letter or response from them.

 

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just re-read you first post on this thread and I had mis-read it, i thought you'd said that he'd claimed Incapacity Benefit when he was first told not to work, but I realize now that you meant for Jobseekers and this February, so sorry for asking about the conts issue. (Unless you did mean feb 06 or he did try to claim back then in which case go back to them and HMSO and get it sorted). I am afraid to say that he is unlikely to get anything now either from JSA or IB because there wont have been any conts in the last tax year (in a claim now i believe that they will be looking at the three years up to April 2007) and because of your earnings it's unlikely that he'll get anything now.

Let me know what the council eventually comes back with, it might be worth writing to them again now, just to make sure that the payslips etc are not all that they are intending to send.

All the best.

Frost

.....of course I may be wrong!:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE:

 

Received a letter on friday 25th saying the will review it from 2006 :D

 

i need to send them more paysipls for certain months. I have all but one :( .

 

They are sending me a form for my employer to fill for that month.

 

Will send them off and see what happens

 

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only extra thing I will add here is the following:

 

Did you notify the HB office of your Tax credit entitlement?

 

If you did and it was THEIR error that they did not input the TAx Credits on to your claim then that is down to Local Authority error and you have good grounds to appeal against the overpayment!.

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Red,

 

Yes they had all the info as the local office photocopied all the relevant doc including the tax awards letter.

 

 

Will be posting off the last part of evidence they need next week

 

 

fingers crossed

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case Ida....you should appeal against the overpayment. You need to be quick about it though as you only have a certain time limit to appeal.

 

You did everything you should have done and the Overpayment is done to their error of not inputting it. YOu have good grounds for an appeal on this. If they refuse the appeal then you appeal to a tribunal and I bet it wont get that far and then they write the debt off.

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to update:

 

Everything they have requested was sent off yesterday.

 

tick, tock.

 

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

:D:D:D:D

 

Received letter today from council tax benefits. We were due some benefit and it has reduced the overpayment by £500.

 

So i rang up and asked if the housing benefit had been reviewed and it has and thats been reduced by £700 .

 

So being left to pay a nearly £2000 overpayment now down to £700 but already paid some of it off.

 

This was from feb 2006 and all been adjusted just by asking them to review it!!!!

 

What a weight of my mind and soooooooooo happy :)

 

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...