Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Airways just keep getting it wrong . . .


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5839 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My story:

 

Perhaps I am not very bright, but having bought a return flight from British Airways and having missed the outbound part, I was under the impression that I would still have the right to use the return. Not so . . .

 

Somewhat fortuitously I happened to phone British Airways customer services centre, just before committing to finalizing the online booking I'd set up for a new outbound flight. Otherwise I may have found myself buying two one way tickets at inflated prices. Strangely I only called because I had a feeling I might fall victim to some handy little loop hole that allows British Airways to sell the same flight twice – it’s sad don’t you think, that this is something I have come to expect from this company?

 

I accept that I missed my flight for personal reasons that I’m sure British Airways has no interest in. However I was willing to book a new outbound flight with the company in the expectation that I could use the return element of my original flight. I was somewhat shocked and dismayed to find that British Airways has exploited an unavoidable situation and as far as I’m concerned robbed me of something I consider to have bought and paid for. If this was a train or a coach, I would not be penalized for missing one element of my journey.

 

I am incensed that British Airways can simply withdraw something that’s already paid for simply because a customer could not travel on one element of the journey – to me it’s daylight robbery. This is the final straw and one of various issues I have with British Airways' service. This morning I sat on the phone waiting to be dealt with by what transpired to be a surly bloke who has no interest in representing BA or ensuring its customers are satisfied. I've listened to its droaning, dreadful marketing blurb over and over again - telling me to use the website, how wonderful the company is and how it always puts its customers first!

 

All I can say is when British Airways claims: ‘there's other ways and there's BA’ it’s damn right – not however for the reasons British Airways might like to think.

 

From here on in, for me, there will always be ‘other ways’ and they won't be British Airways . I may not be the company's best client, but I've travelled regularly with it in the last few months, long haul business, nationally and internationally and this is the second time in that period I feel I’ve had good cause to complain.

 

I can almost imagine that British Airways has long brainstorming meetings dreaming up every possible scenario that could allow it to sell it’s seats twice, never give refunds and no doubt carbon offset the same seats as many times as it sells them.

 

The company refuses to refund for easily made mistakes with online booking. I'm sad to say there's no customer feel good incentive to book with British Airways whatsoever – the company comes across as a money grabbing business that looks after number one, thinks that it's dreadful music is actually soothing – and is totally misguided if it thinks people want to listen to its misleading marketing rubbish time and time again.

 

That’s my story, I am sure there are plenty more. :-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is bizarre! Seems it is actually covered in their T&Cs British Airways - General Conditions of Carriage but I can't see the logic in such a clause.

 

When you challenged it did they give you a reason as to why you couldn't use your return ticket?

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No and nor would they when pressed, the only reason I can see is that it's common for customers to miss an outgoing flight and therefore for BA it's worth invalidating the return portion of the ticket. After all, looking at BA's many clauses and rules, it seems the company's policy is to find as many ways to sell the same seats as is humanly possible. Maybe with BA you only buy the intention to fly as opposed to the right to fly!

 

The upshot is I've had to cancel a business meeting with a client from Australia which was to be held in Germany because the cost is now preventative. I am currently looking at other options such as the train - at least that will have a smaller carbon footprint!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Look at BA, I thought British Rail were bad, but this team seem worse.

Thier Staff relations are a shambles and the new terminal is a mess. I'd rather fly with Icarus Airways than go with BA.

 

68904

Class J50, 0-6-0T from 56B Ardsley Shed 1960.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi There, I've often dipped into this site before but never felt the need to post. But after my recent trip with BA, I just had to share this with you..

 

I flew back from Shanghai to London with BA on May 5th and experienced one of the worst flights I've ever had with any airline. I'd been on a tour of Australia and China for two weeks which entailed 9 seperate flights with differing airlines (Qantas/Jetstar/Shaghai Airlines and BA). Even though my seat with extra leg room had been booked a month in advance (I'm 6"3) I got on board to find no seat allocated and the cabin staff indifferent to helping me out. Most of my 13hr journey was spent standing,as the seat I'd been given was woefully inadequate and I couldn't sit in it for more than 20 mins or so without getting cramp. To add insult to injury I then found out that most of the people in the seats I should have been sitting in had only booked their seats 24hrs beforehand (and I was a good deal taller than all of them too!). As all my travel requirements had been followed to the letter by all the other airlines, I was hugely dissappointed that the only time I travelled on my own national airline should have been handled with such incompetence and insensitivity. When I informed the cabin staff that my seats had been booked a month earlier they just shrugged their shoulders and gave the attitude of 'Well, other people are sitting there now- we can't do anything about it'. We're flying longhaul again later this year and I shall insist on using a professional, 21st century airline like Qantas or Cathay, not hamfisted, bumbling BA!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, there's little point in castigating British Airways for this - most airlines do it; as do the cross channel ferries.

 

The reason is that a return ticket is often cheaper than a single. A single tends to be a fixed price, whilst a return ticket has various offers (Apex, SuperApex, etc.). The rule exists to stop somebody booking a return and only using the return half as a cheaper way to travel.

 

Also, there exists a situation where market forces dictate that a non-direct flight is cheaper than a direct flight. The rule about having to use all the ticket coupons is to prevent somebody booking (for example Schipol to New York via Heathrow) at a low price and simply joining/leaving the flight at Heathrow - in order to get a cheap flight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I flew back from Shanghai to London with BA on May 5th and experienced one of the worst flights I've ever had with any airline. I'd been on a tour of Australia and China for two weeks which entailed 9 seperate flights with differing airlines (Qantas/Jetstar/Shaghai Airlines and BA). Even though my seat with extra leg room had been booked a month in advance (I'm 6"3) I got on board to find no seat allocated and the cabin staff indifferent to helping me out. Most of my 13hr journey was spent standing,as the seat I'd been given was woefully inadequate and I couldn't sit in it for more than 20 mins or so without getting cramp. To add insult to injury I then found out that most of the people in the seats I should have been sitting in had only booked their seats 24hrs beforehand (and I was a good deal taller than all of them too!). As all my travel requirements had been followed to the letter by all the other airlines, I was hugely dissappointed that the only time I travelled on my own national airline should have been handled with such incompetence and insensitivity. When I informed the cabin staff that my seats had been booked a month earlier they just shrugged their shoulders and gave the attitude of 'Well, other people are sitting there now- we can't do anything about it'. We're flying longhaul again later this year and I shall insist on using a professional, 21st century airline like Qantas or Cathay, not hamfisted, bumbling BA!

 

Extra legroom seats are not 'booked in advance'; the very most that can be done is a request. They are allocated a check-in. The reason being that most extra legroom seats are adjacent to emergency exits and the airline is required to check that you are able-bodied enough to operate the door/slide in the event of an emergency. The 24 hours in advance is from use of on-line check-in and can be over-ridden by BA staff. However, if the person is considered able-bodied, then it is first come, first served.

 

If you have an absolute need not to use a standard economy seat (and the seat pitch details are widely available on the Web) then book premium economy or business class.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm assured that the BA employee who took the booking (which was made over the phone) guaranteed a seat for me, so maybe its that staff member who has this wrong.

 

I certainly do think BA can be castigated for this, as all the other airlines that we travelled with managed to fulfill my requirements with ease and the BA employee at no time stated that this asinine policy would be in force (or my colleague simply would have booked a ticket elsewhere). Although I was in very real discomfort on this flight because of my height, I certainly wasn't alone. Many other (smaller) people in Economy were having problems with their seating too. The outward flight (booked through BA) ended up thankfully being on Qantas,who seem to have a very different attitude to Economy class. ie. Enough space to sit in comfort and recline the seat without causing discomfort to the passenger behind (as was happenning to several people on the BA flight). Although I do think paying out (a lot) more money to sit in another section is unfair and penalising me just for being taller than average, that's not the point. The point is that we were guaranteed a seat with extra leg room by a BA employee and acted in good faith (with information provided by that employee) that this would be provided.

 

Every other company we used fulfilled their promise, but if this policy (or rather 'non policy' is common amongst other airlines) then I will certainly consider upgrading to a higher class. But not ever again with BA, I find their and their staff's attitude disgusting.

 

Also, I have friends who've worked for their Euroflleet services for many years now and they're desperate to get out, as a once excellent company goes further and further downhill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...