Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
    • Yeah only £10 so may as well just get it done. When it comes to liaising with the police and bargaining before it hopefully goes to court. How does that happen? Via email? Phone call etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The ULTIMATE question. ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5944 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

we're too busy confusing religion and God. religion is Man-made..........with all our inherent faults. But until someone can prove to me there isn't a God..........then I'll continue to believe that one exists.

 

 

 

 

Better safe, than sorry

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The first question we should be asking ourselves is “to which god is the thread starter referring?” the non-existence of any god or god moniker).

 

As you wish.

 

So, like I said in a much shorter sentence: Whatever helps you get through the day, dude.

 

Way to go Mrs Taylor.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this is a particularly interesting conclusion. Care to expand on it?

 

 

it's the safety -net theory of the agnostic

 

It's impossible to prove the existence of a God, but equally it's impossible to prove He doesn't exist either.

 

So just in case the Day of Judgement actually happens,it's best to believe to be on the safe side

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took my kids to a christening a few years ago now and in a very quiet moment in the ceremony my daughter (aged about three at the time) said to me 'Mummy, who is God?' :eek:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi charley I have heard off that one too, the nothing to lose thoery makes a lot of sence maybe we must have listerned to the same person at some point.

 

Tony what have you started.?? Hugh, I can't see the difference between you and Ukav either, are you sure you have not got those tight slacks on mate.:)

 

I believe in God but as to the bible I do think it's a bit out dated and old fashioned if it isn't then or our socioties morals have been dug well and truly in the ground

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's the safety -net theory of the agnostic

 

It's impossible to prove the existence of a God, but equally it's impossible to prove He doesn't exist either.

 

So just in case the Day of Judgement actually happens,it's best to believe to be on the safe side

do have to say that i agree with u on that one cos no one can say for sure he dont exist so best to play safe and be good and all that :Dthen when we get to the pearly gates well be let in not sent to tother place ;)xxkia
Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have to point out that the nothing to lose policy is really hard work. for instance if you choose to believe just because you can't prove otherwise you then have to follow a cause of action to make sure you hedge your bets so to speak and act like a good christian even if you wanted to strangle someone, no more telling porkies. if you have been given too much change in a shop you have to hand it back, give to charity etc etc etc its no enough saying you believe but doing nothing about it. I personally do all this things anyway ops where my halo but isn't that what we should all be doing any way being the best person we can be. and to bring up our kids to do the same. ever action has a reaction good or bad and what comes around goes around.

 

But on saying all that I have also found that the biggest hypocrites happen to those who believe in some form of god and the worse behaved children and from a religious background. On quite a few occasions when children from christian families have behaved really badly, instead of being punished for the actions the parents have asked every one to pray for them to behave better yer ok. However churches are not completly full of hypocrites, there's plenty of room for more ha and you don't have to be one to join however it does help

 

have you every noticed that if you are given to much change by mistake and you do not give it back odds are you will lose it.

i think it's called the fear of GOD

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never bring into question politics or religion-everyone has an opinion which in my experience never agrees with anyone Else's.:) TonyC, you have a lot to answer for:D

 

Rubbish.

 

Everybody's opinion is welcome. See post number 1.

 

Those who cant debate the possible options, in my opinion, are the ones who cause the most unrest.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I "borrowed" this from the letters to Viz thread. Thanks Fred.

 

 

A woman whose daughter was hospitalised in a US tornado told ITV News that 'God would make her better.' presumably, that's a different God from the one that almost killed her with a tornado.

 

M Lovejoy

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never bring into question politics or religion-everyone has an opinion which in my experience never agrees with anyone else's.:) TonyC, you have a lot to answer for:D

 

Quite the contrary; always bring into question the beliefs of others and yourself; blind acceptance without applied thought serves no purpose other than to create slavish obedience.

It's largely through disagreement, discourse and ultimate protest against the beliefs of others that our species has reached such an unprecedented level of intellectual and philosophical freedom.

 

Remember moggieb, politically it's only through protest that our social representatives are elected rather than self appointed. Only through protest that we have the right to be judged by our peers in criminal trials. Only by protest that few of us work a full week and have holiday entitlement. Only through protest that women can vote. And perhaps more topically, only through protest that people can reclaim their bank charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TEZ, we like to think it's through protest!! but lets face it government does not listen to protests or pressure groups unless they have a ulterior motive to do so.

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TEZ, we like to think it's through protest!! but lets face it government does not listen to protests or pressure groups unless they have a ulterior motive to do so.

 

This statement is not accurate, nor I suspect - if pressed - could you justify it. This tends to be the classic response from those who feel politically disempowered, but it has not, is not, nor is likely to ever become completely true. Of course there are occasions in which governments refuse to listen to the populous unless it suits their interests (the UK's shameful compliance with America's policy of state-backed terrorism is an example), but ultimately governments will always be moulded by the popular will.

Legislation moves downward. Social change moves up.

 

None of the major changes in social, religious or political history I've already mentioned came about through the establishment listening to the people because it satisfied their own interests, indeed, in most cases quite the reverse. The establishment is ultimately beholden to the will of the people, and however disenfranchised we might individually feel it remains a fact that collectively we can force change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...