Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Can you tell us more about what happened please? Who stopped you and which shop? Best, HB
    • You don't mention what the debts are, which is important, as it really depends on the details in deciding best course of action. So list types of debt e.g credit card, type of loan, utility bill; current owner bank or dca; approximate amount for each debt.  And do you own any property assets. There is no blanket advice regarding all types of debts. Whoever you contact regarding debt advice would want to know all of the information. The debt buying businesses deal with multi billions worth of debts. They can't issue Court claims for most debts as the cost of pursuing would be ruinous and don't have staff resources. Instead they rely on credit records being impacted and therefore people need to resolve the debts. And they rely on anxious debtors paying amounts after receiving threatening communications. If you know you are likely to be made redundant, start looking for other employment soon. Due to longer recruitment processes being followed by employers, it can take about 3 months between applying and starting a new job.
    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson Way help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5806 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

That's fair enough, and of course it is a debtor's legal right to request a CCA, I wasn't claiming it isn't. In the thread that you're referring to, I asked a valid question, since the OP states that they know owe the money to Cahoot, it seemed a bit odd that they would dispute liability just because a DCA takes over the account.

 

In this thread, I have actually stated that Robinson Way would more than likely accept an offer of £1 per month if sent by the CAB with a financial statement, so I fail to see why it is me being targeted? Surely more can be expected from the CAG staff?

 

A fair point and if i have offended you then i am not too big to say sorry where an apology is due, however, the problem is that i viewed your posts and i saw that many of them sounded quite like they were to illicit a response from the users

 

the thing you must remember is that people come here out of desperation, many of people are pressured by DCAs, treated unfairly and harassed and also lied to in many cases in an attempt to get them to pay whatever, often on statute barred debts or debts which do not have a valid contract supporting them

 

so you have to remember that we are very protective of our members and that when it appears that someone is trolling like your posts appeared to be, we will reply with posts such as dont feed the troll to try and avoid heated arguments which serve to help no one

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

That's appreciated. Now, I genuinely would like to help people out here since I know the ins and outs of how Robinson Way work, so if you are willing to accept my help, then I will help out on here.

 

Now, as far as people on CAG (and indeed the law) will say, your sister has absolutely NO legal obligation to prove that she doesn't owe this money, it is in fact the other way around. The DCA has to prove that she does.

 

That said, I suggest this as a personal opinion of how to get the issue resolved easily, even though you legally do NOT have to.

 

If you sister has some kind of ID, such as a passport, driving license, etc; something official with her signature on it, I personally, would photocopy it and send it to RW to show the signature differs. In my experience, that would resolve it the quickest.

 

Let me just clarify, I know you do not have to prove a thing. Just what I would personally do to get it off your back.

 

To the op: I genuinely would like to help you out, if you want to PM me the reference number, I'll delay the account or whatever til you can send it over, if you chose to do so.

 

If you don't, that's obviously your choice, since RW have to prove she owes it.

 

I hope you can see I'm really not trying to be a dick and stand up for people who treat people like crap on the phone. I am one of the good guys, even if it doesn't seem like it. :)

This post does not reflect the professional views of any DCA; it is purely the poster's own opinions and personal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However if Robinson Way cannot provide a true copy of a signed CCA then the OP does not have to keep paying any money to them whether Robin Alexander is a nice guy or not.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a dispute over the signature is there not?

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What advice is that? Pay the debt even though they cannot prove its yours? Loads of advice that is to a woman who has serious mental health problems, and probably, but not necessarily a hardship problem.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not going to continue arguing when my stance is quite clear. I did not once say to pay it. Look back. Just read post #77. If you cannot contribute something meaningful to the thread, do not reply. Regardless of what you or other users think of me, I am willing to help the OP out. Again, I didn't once say to pay the account, so please get your facts right before posting defamatory comments about people.

 

The advice offered in post #77 is possibly the easiest solution, being that a CCA was provided and the signatures differ.

This post does not reflect the professional views of any DCA; it is purely the poster's own opinions and personal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I can confirm that unfortunately my sister does indeed suffer not only from mental health problems but also a hardship problem - that often comes hand in hand with Bi-Polar as sufferes are often not good at management of resources etc.

 

I am going to be following TGM's advice and getting the right to deal with this case completely signed over to me so that I can take any potential stress off my sister - because to be honest there is a fairly strong possibility of her being re-admitted to a phsyciatric hospital due to her illness and that would put a full stop to any chance of anyone getting any money! But regardless of that I really, really do not want to see her back there!

 

Given that they have sent out a copy agreement already with these sigs on it what do people think about sending proof that these do not match my sisters? Does anyone ahve any experience of such actions previously? If it is likely to end this matter smoothly and quickly I would be willing to consider it!

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever Robin, you said in the other Robinson's way thread to pay it back. In my opinion, and that is all it is, anyone who makes their crust working for a DCA, threatening and harrassing someone who is struggling is ****. Whether this applies to anyone on this board or not is something I do not know, but they will. If they take offence then good, they should. Pretending to be someone who is giving advice, and again I am not naming any names here, makes them double ****. I just hope that if they are here and reading this they can sleep soundly knowing that what they are doing is nothing short of bullying.

 

I do hope that United's sister asks for a TRUE signed copy of her CCA as I am sure that Robbingsomeone's way cannot provide one.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, I repeat, a lot of people who work for DCAs do, well and truly, threaten people who may be struggling, but that does not apply to everyone who works for a DCA, which you need to be aware of. What you're doing is nothing more than prejudice, which makes you no better than the people working in DCAs who threaten and harass customers.

 

If anyone chooses to accept my help and advice, that's up to them, same goes for if they do not want to.

 

As far as the other thread goes, whereby I apparently 'said to pay it back', again double check. I didn't once say that, I merely questioned the OP as to why dispute liability, simply because the account is sold to a DCA, when they've been paying the original creditor without a problem.

Edited by robinalexander

This post does not reflect the professional views of any DCA; it is purely the poster's own opinions and personal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for an extra piece of information, earlier on today I spoke to a local printing company (experts in the field of printing / special effects / photoshop) and a very nice chap have incredibly kindly said he will take a peak at the copy we have been sent and offer an expert opinion as to whether it has been "tampered" with (not that I suggest for one minute that any company involved would have done such a thing) because I am still concerend that the 2 sigs do not match each other and want to eliminate any possibility(however slight) that this discrepency has been caused by any foul play.

 

Disclaimer - I am not suggesting or implying that any company, person, or organisation involved in this, or any other case, has or ever would tamper with any documentation. I am simply having this checked to be sure in my own mind.

  • Haha 1

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i go to bed and a troll turns up typical.

 

UF glad u will be thinking about my idea it will help ur sis sort her health out.

 

TGM

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...