Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • unclebulgaria67
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By unclebulgaria67 · Posted

      Apparently some journalists have heard that Sunak may call an election next weekend or in the week following the bank holiday Monday. With the election to be held at the end of June. Rishi Sunak could call snap general election | Politics | News | Express.co.uk WWW.EXPRESS.CO.UK Here's why the Prime Minister could announce a general election soon  
    • unclebulgaria67
      Recording audio in health conversations

      By unclebulgaria67 · Posted

      Found a BMA article related to this subject which I think the OP will find helpful. Patients recording consultations WWW.BMA.ORG.UK Our guidance answers if patients can record doctors without permission or covertly, how to respond when a patient asks to record their appointment and what to do if a covert recording is posted online.  
    • HP Mum
      my Leasehold/Freehold property and it's issues.

      By HP Mum · Posted

      Ah - that was another thread that got merged back in 2018   That 'split' doesnt refer to this legal matter  
    • Seven77
      Caught fare evasion in tube station

      By Seven77 · Posted

      Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • lookinforinfo
      NPE ANPR PCN - No Permit - Locton Estate, London, E3 2LP

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

court claim from Robinson Way / Cap One

linz2011

By linz2011
in Capital One

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4913 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

caro

caro

Posted
Posted

Is there another side to the agreement?

 

Also the default notice and notice of assignment.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
caro

caro

Posted
Posted
Hi all

I have now received a court claim from Robinson Way they have sent this application form as the CCA, a statement of account, copy of default and copy notice of assignment. They have asked that I accept liability and withdraw my (holding) defence.

Help appreicated as not sure it is a valid CCA or not - also they have not sent copies of the statements just like a monthly breakdown from 1999 to 2007

Thanks :)

 

Should I reply to the letter or just send in an amended defence?

Thanks

 

Do you have enough info to amend the defence? If you are happy with your defence then leave it as it is. If you think it needs beefing up in light of the documents you've been sent, then you should amend it, but it's up to you and not Robinson Way.

 

Have they offered you a reduced amount for a full and final settlement if you withdraw your defence? I'm inclined to say don't bother answering the letter.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
linz2011

linz2011

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

They sent me a letter enclosing a copy of that application form a default notice template (not populated with my details) and a copy of notice of assignment but on plain paper no heading and asked me to withdraw my defence - however, the defence I put in was a holding defence and I do not know if I should amend it

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
caro

caro

Posted
Posted

I'll try and muster someone better equipped to advise.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
steven4064

steven4064

Posted
Posted

The fact that it is a copy of an application form does not necessarily mean they have not complied with the CCA as quite a few CC companies have a dual purpose application form and CC agreement. What they need to enforce the agreement is a single document with your signature and the prescribed terms - credit limit, how monthly minimum payments are determined and interest rate. Without that, they should not be able to enforce the agreement. They should also have provided you with a statement of account and with a copy of any notice of assignment.

 

THey ave to be able to prove

that you owe them the money

that you owe them the money

that you owe them the money

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
linz2011

linz2011

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

Thanks - I received a list of account balances but not copy statements and a copy of a default template (no details filled in) notice of assignment not on letter head and a letter asking me to withdraw my defence

Link to post
Share on other sites
Desperate Daniella

Desperate Daniella

Posted
Posted

Hi Linz,

 

That is a very strange looking 'agreement'. Capital One in the early 2000s were not putting the prescribed terms on their agreements/application forms, so if their earlier forms were actually compliant with the CCA 1974 why would they change them to ones that weren't.

 

Is that CREDIT AGREEMENT .... really that close to the black heading saying Credit Card Account Agreement? It looks very squashed.

 

Apart from giving an address to write to about Marketing material I can't see their full name and address on this. I think that needs to be on any agreement? I'm sure someone else will advise.

 

The financial and related particulars have all the interest rates, etc. as far as I can see, but that whole paragraph looks as though it has been lifted from a separate document. It makes several references to 'overleaf' and you must ask for a copy of this, as well as a copy of the Default Notice they are saying was sent. A blank one will not do.

 

Personally I would also state that you wish to visit their offices to view the original agreement as they will be relying on this in Court.

 

I also think you should start a new thread headed "CAPITAL ONE - Urgently need 'agreement' from 1998 or close date." If you put the link here we can keep bumping it. It's always very useful to know what other people have been sent.

 

For example, the MSDW cut and paste applications are hysterical - two applications in exactly the same style and signed on the very same day have a different number of questions - so it would be helpful to know if Capone are doing something similar.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites
linz2011

linz2011

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for this - I have read that there has been 'manipulation' of credit agreements - they have until the 2nd July to complete the AQ and pay the fee otherwise it will be struck out so I will wait till then and if they do pay and submit the AQ I will send them a letter :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
The GodMother

The GodMother

Posted
Posted

Oh congrats.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
linz2011

linz2011

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi all

 

This was struck out and now they have applied to have it reinstated and have received an hearing date for the 15th October (90 minutes allocated) - just really need some help - I only have an holding defence in at the moment and really could use some help with pointers for the hearing and errors in the paperwork

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
linz2011

linz2011

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

 

It doesnt actual say it just says following the claimaints request this claim is reinstated and AQ and fee needs to be submitted before the 16th September which they have now done and the hearing date has been allocated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
seniorservice

seniorservice

Posted
Posted

I think you should ask the court for a copy of their application and AQ first to get an idea of RW's position. As has been said before, it's up to you whether you amend your defence in the light of the documents they have provided or just go with the one you have already submitted.

It seems that you've got the standard old-style Cap One application that they say is the agreement but doesn't have any prescribed terms and there is a lot of doubt about the legality of the assignment and of course, no default notice.

What RW are doing makes a nonsense of court procedure - they have had their claim struck out back in July due to non-compliance and now they think it is OK just to ask for it to be reinstated (and have it granted). You don't have such luxury - if you didn't submit the AOS or AQ on time they would have had obtained judgement by default. Trust you will bring this to the Judge's attention at the appropriate time.

Hope this helps

 

SS

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
linz2011

linz2011

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

My court date is on Friday I have received all the papers from the court it is Robinson Way Limited and it has been completed by Horwich Farrelly and they have asked for an order that:

1 The defendants defence be struck out and/or

2 the claimant do have summary judgmenet against the defendant pursuant to CPR Part 24

 

Because the defence discloses no triable issue; and the defendant has no real prospect of defending the claim for the reasons set out in the witness statement of xxx dated xxxand there is no compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at a trial.

 

They have included a business sale agreement dated 25/9/09 Robinson Way & Company Ltd (as seller) London Scottish Bank plc (in administration) London Scottish Computer Services Ltd (in administration) The Administrators Robinson Way & Company 2009 Ltd (as buyer)

 

Also included is a companies house letter showing Robinson Way Limited details along with notice of assignment and copy of the application form.

 

Really confused as to where I am going with this so any help is greatly received! thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
cymruambyth

cymruambyth

Posted
Posted

Does the business sale agreement have 2 different dates, not sure what this means but....

Do you have an application form from Cap1 with no t&cs?

I am igorant on this but think you need to go through the WS and put your own arguments, with CCA or case law in support to counter their arguments.

Do you have a DN, notice of assignment? Have the court had any documents to notify of change of name?

Sorry if these questions have been answered earlier, just looking at ideas.

Link to post
Share on other sites
linz2011

linz2011

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi

No there is just one date on the business sale

No DN application form and T&C's on separate sheet

No documents to the court about change of name

Yes there is a notice of assignment

THanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...