Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Telephone Harassment Letters Respected.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4745 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't even have a problem with paying them BUT it's just that if I make a payment to them it will get swallowed up in the mire of excessive charges and bottomless pit of an overdraft !!! If they refunded the charges it would be ok !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Office of Fair Trading debt collection guidance

 

 

Creditors are warned by the Office of Fair Trading under the Debt Collection Guidance that the following practices are "considered unfair":

 

IT IS UNFAIR TO COMMUNICATE, IN WHATEVER FORM, WITH CONSUMERS IN AN UNCLEAR, INACCURATE OR MISLEADING MANNER.

 

This includes:

 

Letters that look like court claims Not making it clear who the company is or what their role is Unhelpful legal language Not giving balance statements about the debt when asked Contacting you at unreasonable times even when asked not to Asking you to contact them on premium rate phone numbers.

 

THOSE CONTACTING DEBTORS MUST NOT BE DECEITFUL BY MISREPRESENTING THEIR AUTHORITY AND/OR THE CORRECT LEGAL POSITION.

 

This includes:

 

Claiming to work for the court or be a bailiff Implying action can be taken that is not legally possible such as implying they could take your property Using a business name or logo that implies they are a government body Implying that court action has been taken against you when it hasn’t Implying not paying your debt is a criminal offence Threatening to take court action in England if you live in Scotland or the other way round.

 

PUTTING PRESSURE ON DEBTORS OR THIRD PARTIES IS CONSIDERED TO BE OPPRESSIVE

 

This includes:

 

 

Contacting you too frequently

Pressurising you to sell property or take out more debt

Using more than one collection company at the same time or not telling you when your debt has been passed to another company

Pressurizing you to pay in full or in large installments you cannot afford Making threatening gestures or statements

Ignoring disputes about whether you owe the money

Trying to embarrass you in public or threatening to tell a third party about your debts such as a neighbour or your family.

 

DEALINGS WITH DEBTORS ARE NOT TO BE DECEITFUL AND/OR UNFAIR

 

Examples include:

 

Sending letters addressed to “the occupier” or discussing the debt with someone without knowing if they are you

Refusing to deal with an adviser acting on your behalf

Not accepting reasonable offers or passing on payments you make

Refusing to freeze action if you dispute the debt.

 

CHARGES SHOULD NOT BE LEVIED UNFAIRLY

 

Examples include:

 

 

Claiming collection costs when the original credit agreement didn’t allow this to happen and making you think you are legally liable for the costs

Not putting the specific amounts that can be added for collection costs in the original credit agreement

Adding unreasonable charges.

 

THOSE VISITING DEBTORS MUST NOT ACT IN AN UNCLEAR OR THREATENING MANNER

 

Collectors should explain the reason for any visit and give you notice of the time and date they will call

They shouldn’t visit if they know you are ill or vulnerable and if they find you are unwell or distressed they should leave

They should not come in if you do not want them to and should leave when you ask them to

They shouldn’t visit you at work or somewhere like a hospital.

  • Haha 1

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, but until a few months time, the court simply hasn't got the powers to enforce the guidelines. they are not binding.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol thanks Josh, my bedtime reading is the OFT's guidance on debt collection !!

 

Hey 42 man.

 

Thats just a start ( a summary) if you want some bedtime reading here goes.

 

But unless the account is in default they don't apply.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Tell them in writing you will only communicate in writing and only on the subject of the penalty charges I assume have been added to your account.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol wha?

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im gutted sent one off to RW so i could get onto phase 2 of my little plan , the buggers are only doing what i asked and havent called since .

Might start ringing them now .

CAG v dca

 

CAG EVERYTIME .....

KEEP RIGHT ON TILL THE END OF THE ROAD ........

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I sent a warning letter to Nationwide Debt Recovery NDR (part of Littlewoods Group), and they stopped contacting me by telephone.

 

I also sent a warning letter to Mercers Debt Collections (part of Barclays/Barclaycard), they have also stopped, but they seriously messed up whilst investigating by the response coming from Barclaycard, as the Formal Complaint was made against Mercers Debt Collections Ltd.

 

Regards

Kieran

Regards

Kieran

_______________________________________

Harassment Complaints Ongoing

Sky Card

Capital One Bank (Europe) plc

 

Harassment Complaints Won

Mercers Debt Collections Ltd

Nationwide Debt Recovery (NDR)

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc

Link to post
Share on other sites

;)wait till they send letters then move onto the adminstration of justice act 1970 section 40

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only two of Mr Z's creditors had our landline number:

 

LLoyds TSB - They were ringing only once a day - but that was once too much in our book, they eventually complied, took a couple of letters though!

 

First Direct - They ignored first letter so wrote to their data controller quoting the Data Protection Act 1998 demanding removal and telling them they were not to pass it on to any DCA. They complied.

 

The other Creditors only had a mob number which we quickly got rid of!! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remind them of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 Section 40.

 

Due to the nature of the calls and the frequency of the calls they would apear to be in breach of this section of the act.

 

An argument could be made in the banks favour that they were saving money phoneing you. Which they were but because of the frequency of the calls they are in breach of this section of the act.

 

Have they sent you any letters yet?

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JOSH_IOU,

 

Re the telephone calls from Lloyds TSB, compared to some people who receive several calls, once a day didn’t seem that bigger deal!

 

Strangely enough, I got all the harassing letters mainly BLS and the phone calls seemed to be for me. Mr Z got letters too but not as many. Perhaps they thought they could intimidate a woman more!

 

Lloyds TSB got a couple of complaint letters from me with all the acts I could muster (thanks to this site) and a couple of months ago they agreed to a payment plan for 12 months. Mr Z still pays his token payment but has not received any more letters from Lloyds TSB or BLS and what’s more, no payment plan was agreed for him. So not sure what’s going on there!

 

First Direct only phoned the once and the answer machine took care of that call. :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) big deal or no deal if they are calling you and acting unlawfull you have the right to complain.

 

If they phone once and dont return the calls then this isnt effectively harrasment as the matter must have existsed twice. (ie you must have been called more than twice.)

 

One thing to look at is If the manner of the call was the same as the previous call you may have grounds to launch harrasment proceedings. Normally police will only intervene if you are being harrased on the door step or there is an immediate danger to life. In which case the dca will be long gone b4 he gets here.

 

You have to talk to the police like banks to be honest You have to quote the law. But you may be better aproaching Trading Standards than the police. unless they threten you at the door of course because trading standards will laugh and say this is a criminal matter. (ie they want ya to go to the police.)

 

Like i said if they called just the once then stopped. Bibs ya uncle cus that all you want them to do.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

How bout this

Cancer patient sues the Halifax for harassment after 762 calls about loan

 

the times newspaper

 

Solicitor in Plymouth took it on and also another lady who sued Halifax. details of solicitor not hard to find on net

muffintop

Won Nationwide £900 and £1908 Bank Charges

Lloyds personal account 1,861

Lloyds Bus Account 2k

Abbey bank acc. Stayed 2008

 

CCA requested Barclaycard Nov 08 - n1 issued - GAVE UP

CCA Mbna Nov 08- n1 issued - GAVE UP

Marks and Spencer Money Nov 08 -lost found 2b enforceable.

Tomson Holiday - WON

 

if I help you tip my little scales it gives me a thrill. MT

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Debitas are going for the throat! Despite writing to them and Capital One (both twice) they are still phoning me - last night's second call was at 8.40 pm. Told them I was watching Watchdog because I'd written to them about a scabby company called Debitas who believe they are above the Law (haven't - yet) and the phone went dead

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the letter off to Buchanan, Clark and Wells. I verbally requested that they remove my phone number twice but they only did so after the letter. When they did phone me i kept asking the monkey where they had got my number from (which is private and i do not give it out) but they kept asking me to go through security (i refused) and they never told me were they got my number from.

 

Roxburghe called me and i told them not to call me and to put everything in writing which they did. Again i asked the monkey where he had got my number from and he said their client (HFO). They have returned the alleged debt to HFO after i asked for proof and asked how they had got my telephone number.

 

What the DCA's don't know is my phone has the facility to record calls and store them on the memory card till i can put them on the pc. I feel sorry for the next one that calls me.

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

i sent the letter to a company called A.R.C. Europe and the calls stopped straight away, but they have passed the debt onto 'scotcall'

Never bite the hand that feeds you, always remember that while you are on this forum you are just a peasant....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

telephone harrassment by CAPQUEST pretending to have an important telegram and talking to members of staff not the person they called!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

sounds like a right [problem], will be sending the COMPLAINT asap

 

also pretending not to be able to hear the complaint

 

so cross with this bunch!!!!111

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...