Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to get compensation as a third party when Insurance Company refuses liability


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I would be grateful of all advice and assistance in relation to the following situation: -

 

A girlfriend meets an old male friend in a pub, there is too much noise so they go outside to talk and catch up. He sits in the drivers seat of his car and the girlfriend in the passenger seat out of the cold.

 

The girls boyfriend turns up and thinking that she is having an affair he DELIBERATELY drives his car into the parked vehicle and causes serious injury to both the old friend and the girlfriend.

 

The boyfriend's insurance company has denied liability to pay any personal injury claim on the grounds that this was NOT an accident AND the incident took place on private property.

 

Who can both injured parties now claim from to address their injuries?

 

I have discovered the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) but there are two issues: -

 

1. MIB applies to uninsured or untraceable drivers - the boyfriend was insured but the incident falls outside the scope of his policy - was he therefore NOT insured?

 

2. The issue of private property?

 

Can you shed any light on who to instigate a claim against?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to get compensation as a third party when Insurance Company refuses liability

Hi,

 

I would be grateful of all advice and assistance in relation to the following situation: -

 

A girlfriend meets an old male friend in a pub, there is too much noise so they go outside to talk and catch up. He sits in the drivers seat of his car and the girlfriend in the passenger seat out of the cold.

 

The girls boyfriend turns up and thinking that she is having an affair he DELIBERATELY drives his car into the parked vehicle and causes serious injury to both the old friend and the girlfriend.

 

The boyfriend's insurance company has denied liability to pay any personal injury claim on the grounds that this was NOT an accident AND the incident took place on private property.

 

Who can both injured parties now claim from to address their injuries?

 

I have discovered the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) but there are two issues: -

 

1. MIB applies to uninsured or untraceable drivers - the boyfriend was insured but the incident falls outside the scope of his policy - was he therefore NOT insured?

 

2. The issue of private property?

 

Can you shed any light on who to instigate a claim against?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds like a legal exercise rather than a real incident.

 

IANAL but I would guess that if the police convicted the boyfriend you might be able to get criminal injuries compensation, and your other course of action would be a civil claim against the boyfriend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a case like this, the claim would need to be made directly against the driver, not the insurance company.

 

I would say from the offset that I think it's unlikely your friend would get any kind of settlement from the driver without proceeding to a court claim, and as this is a personal injury claim, any claim over £1,000 will not be heard in the Small Claims Court. Therefore your friend may well want some help in making such a claim, so if she knows of a reputable solicitor, she may want to approach them to see if they will handle the claim using a Conditional Fee Arrangement. Alternatively, she may have Legal Protection cover on her home insurance which could be used.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you parked your car in a pub car park and it got torched would an insurance co. refuse to pay out for fire damage on the private property claim? I think not!

 

Yes, you are insured in a private car park, but reading the question carefully I don't think that is the issue. I think the injured parties are trying to claim for personal injury and the insurance company are saying any injury sustained was not caused by an accident, but was pre-meditated, which would be correct. It is possible that this would not be covered by the boyfriend's policy.

Getting into a car at night with an ex can sometimes be dangerous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to get compensation as a third party when Insurance Company refuses liability

 

The girls boyfriend turns up and thinking that she is having an affair he DELIBERATELY drives his car into the parked vehicle and causes serious injury to both the old friend and the girlfriend.

 

The boyfriend's insurance company has denied liability to pay any personal injury claim on the grounds that this was NOT an accident AND the incident took place on private property.

 

The insurance company are saying saying that the boyfriend caused the accident deliberately and therefore it is not an accident and no claim or liability is due. This can probably wriggle out on this technicality but I suspect it depends on the policy. However if they have paid out for repairs to his vehicle and/or the other vehicle damaged then they have admitted that there is a liability and they should pay out on personal injury.

 

I think you would either have go down the lines of a criminal injuries claim or a personal injuries claim against the boyfriend. The boyfriend may have other insurance that will cover him for personal liability not just motor vehicle insurance. It might pay to consult a lawyer as to the rights and wrongs on this one. You can get free legal advice at the Citizens Advice Bureau. I think the RAC and the AA offer similiar services to their members.

 

Some of these no win no fee personal injury lawyers will probably give you some advice on whether you have a claim against the insurer or not.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged - please don't post multiple threads about the same thing.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are insured in a private car park, but reading the question carefully I don't think that is the issue. I think the injured parties are trying to claim for personal injury and the insurance company are saying any injury sustained was not caused by an accident, but was pre-meditated, which would be correct. It is possible that this would not be covered by the boyfriend's policy.

Getting into a car at night with an ex can sometimes be dangerous.

 

I did read it carefully and it said it was for TWO reasons not being an accident and on private property. Without seeing the individual policy I would not like to make a guess on liability for acts of violence using the car. The driver should have been reported for the act to the Police and prosecuted for any number of offences. The claim could then have been made against the driver and damages got from the Criminal injuries process. If all else fails a civil claim can be made through the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have your own insurance, and have the Legal plus/protection service, there will take on any further claims you might have, even some unions offer leagl plus for such, so consult them also, if you are in a union...But seek the advice of your own insurers directly...If your boyfriend has now been convicted of this offence by the courts, why hasnt damages been claimed via the courts ? Hope you both are now recovering okay and all the best...

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Guest Claims Management Centre

OK, I have personal experience of dealing with a claim virtually identical to this... a driver deliberately drove his car at a man whom he believed was having an affair with his wife. The claim was successfully made against the insurance company who insured the car that caused the injury and the pedestrian was awarded somewhere in the region of about £3500.

 

The MIB will not deal with the claim as you rightfully say that the vehicle is insured and the driver identified. You will get the runaround from the insurance company because they will try every tactic to keep their money in their pockets.

 

The problem here is that the insurance company will say that the driver was using the car as a weapon and therefore it is a criminal injury rather than negligence on the part of their insured. However, in our case, we stated that the driver became negligent in his duty of care of driving responsibly.

 

It was a lengthy claim and took some time to force the liability issue but was won in the end.

 

My guess is thay the legal expenses insurance policy on the 'old friend's' insurance would decline the claim on the basis that liability would be less than 50-50 because most of those LEI policies only become worthy when the claim is an easy one.

 

Don't hesitate to ask if you want more info.

 

Regards

 

Brenig

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...