Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

M.Loan in default. HSBC reopen closed loan?


hsbcfiddled
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5820 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

History:

 

In February 2004 HSBC insisted that I entered into a Managed Loan (ML) which has since the end of June 2007 been in default.

The default being they failed to provide the agreement in the set time frame to supply under CCA1974.

Then when they did eventually supply the agreement, I found four errors in the agreement;) .

 

HSBC Continued to attempt to take payment from the account for the ML.

From reading other posts I suspected that they would attempt to continue taking payments so to prevent them from being able to do so after the default date I stopped putting any money into the account.

Well I didn't want to assist them in breaking the law.:)

Result more charges:eek: .

I have repeatedly told them they cannot take/request payment or add charges.

I told HSBC the defaulted ML is a Dodo:p .

 

HSBC's response was to close my account about 2 weeks ago and pass ML to Metropolitan (MCS) even though they cannot legally do so.

No contact from MCS to date.

A parachute account opened five months ago so no problem there.

 

Local Branch Manager (not responsible foir either loan-not at the branch at the time) has been very helpful after HSBC tried to put all the problems back on Local branch managers desk.

 

My problem today:

 

HSBC now want to go back to an earlier agreement that was opened in September 1993 then closed when the now defaulted Managed Loan was opened.

 

Can they re-open a closed loan:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem today:

 

HSBC now want to go back to an earlier agreement that was opened in September 1993 then closed when the now defaulted Managed Loan was opened.

 

Can they re-open a closed loan:?

 

in what way do they want to go back to it?

 

if they want to use it as the basis for the new loan no they cant because its a totally different contractual agreement they terminated when the new loan was opened.

 

to even allow you to consider whether to allow this you would need full disclosure from them for the old loan, the contractual agreement you signed plus full records of the loan, statements or microfilm copies for its full term, not just the few months back to the statutory limitations date and even then at the point they gave you the new loan the terms and conditions of the old loan would be redundant.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

to even allow you to consider whether to allow this you would need full disclosure from them for the old loan, the contractual agreement you signed plus full records of the loan, statements or microfilm copies for its full term, not just the few months back to the statutory limitations date and even then at the point they gave you the new loan the terms and conditions of the old loan would be redundant.

 

pete

Hi Pete,

 

HSBC have already supplied a copy of the agreement, and it appears to be genuine. It was signed in September 03 so statements wont be a problem.

I bet they dont take 40 days though.

Fiddled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya fiddled, all I can say is listen to what they say, their reasons for wanting to use these terms and conditions etc.

 

The only way they could bring these terms and conditions into the argument surrounding your new loan is if they say the new loan is an extension of the old loan. But as you also have what they thought were conditions for the new loan its obviously just an attempt to cover their own negligence.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya fiddled, all I can say is listen to what they say, their reasons for wanting to use these terms and conditions etc.

 

The only way they could bring these terms and conditions into the argument surrounding your new loan is if they say the new loan is an extension of the old loan. But as you also have what they thought were conditions for the new loan its obviously just an attempt to cover their own negligence.

 

pete

 

Hi Pete,

 

We do have a meeting planned for 2 weeks time.

I am only going to listen to what they have to say.

However if they suggest that they can restart this earlier loan.

I will suggest that we re-open the loans that were consilidated even prior to this one.....I mean how far do they want to go back?

I am quite happy to go back as far as they like...then we will see how much information they do have....beyond six years perhaps??????

 

I feel that if legally they could enforce the re-opening of this earlier ML then they wouldnt be needing a meeting with me.

 

fiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well what a surprise!

 

HSBC have written off £4600 that was added into 2nd ML (which is in default)

 

They arent even going to try to restart the first ML(£16.6K)- but they are willing to put the £12K of the first ML (plus interest to date) will then be recalculated at a 2003 personal loan rate.

The almost £10K that I have paid on 2nd ML will be recalculated at the personal loan rate and reduced from the balance.

They have also offered me over £500 in charges/interest fees in a cheque as a refund of business account charges between June 2001 and October 2001. I had also added to the charges/interest fees compounded interest @14.8% which came to £1K this will also come off the balance of the loan.

 

They offered this Knowing that I have £9000 in personal account charges to date and that I am going for Compounded interest @14.8%.

 

The business account has approx £4600 in charges between 1999 & 2001 which equates with interest Compounded to about £20K.

 

I am now awaiting the calculation of the interest free loan but I feel that

1. collapse of the managed loan.

2. repayment of some business charges.

3. Compounded interest indirectly applied.

4. and £4600 just written off!

 

I feel that it is 4-0 to hsbcfiddled and its not even HALFTIME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks PD & Pete,

 

Yeah I was surprised that I had managed to get someone to listen to me.....but then they are the Listening Bank........oooops just fell off my chair.

 

Now that I have escaped from that horrid Managed Loan I feel a great load has lifted from my shoulders.

 

I also presented them with a copy of my 'definition of a managed loan' to put up on their wall.

MANAGED LOAN- Definition of.

 

We (A bank) have MANAGED to con you (our loyal customer i.e. MUG) into paying exhorbitant interest on a debt that we have manufactured (in most cases) by adding exhorbitant unlawful charges to your account.

Thus we are able to 'make you an offer that you cannot refuse' (quote from 'Cosa Nostra' manual for collecting monies).

The offer being, we then, lend your own money back to you (that we have taken unlawfully from your account) to pay off your overdraft, that we have manufactured with our unlawful charges.

You promise to make monthly payments to us (A bank), that are massively loaded with interest so that we have you contributing to our enormous profits for the rest of your life, and after if we can.

Because you have made your promise the bank reciprocates your promise by promising that every time you go even a few pence over your overdraft or are late making a payment WE PROMISE to hammer you with even more unlawful charges.

The interest that we take from our MANAGED LOAN system is then lent out to other mugs (writer included) to pay off more manufactured debts (overdrafts etc.) and thus the cycle continues.

 

 

That got a wry smile.

 

fiddled.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As a result of a meeting with HSBC- they have accepted the ML £16.6K signed in Feb 2004 is a Dodo.

They admit that they failed to consolidate one of four loans/accounts when a previous ML was signed in Sept 2003 leaving £4600 plus in our account -which we then spent.

They now propose to write off the £4600 and put the ML of £12000 onto a personal loan rate (for the purpose of adding interest) at that time.

All the payments I have made will have the interest adjusted to the same personal loan interest rate and then subtracted from loan total.

The figure remaining will then be paid on an interest FREE basis with the payments at our choice (within reason).

 

The people I have dealt with also helped twist some arms to release £500 of business interest & charges plus over £1100 in compounded interest.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good grief fiddled are you having an affair with the fairy godmother ???? or do you say... look into my eyes, look into my eyes... when you walk in ???? :D who the hell are you talking to? .

 

whatever your doing it seems to be working so more power to you and well done :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done and merry xmas HSBC...... Aud

 

Do you realise you just wished HSBC a Merry Christmas, Auburn :eek::D

 

I know what you mean though.........:)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Update on Managed Loan refund.

 

Well....... a further meeting took place in February with a HSBC Area PFS Manager, and a Branch Manager from a different location.

My Local Branch Manager was not in attendance.

 

I told them that I was not going to make any payments because the Managed Loan had not been correctly executed as was in fact a dodo!

 

The Area PFS Manager admitted that the agreement for various reasons had not been drawn up properly and that the person responsible had been admonished (I saw him leaving just before I entered the meeting- first time I had seen him since Feb 2004).

 

The Branch Manager said to me "do you acknowlegde that you had the money"

 

I replied "Yes, but the loan was a result of massive charges and subsequent interest levied on my business".

 

The meeting closed after about an hour but the final words from the Area PFS Manager were "I am sorry that this problem has arisen and that it hasnt been sorted before now. I know what I would do if the decision was up to me, but we will now have to pass it over to our legal department"

 

I wrote to DG Solicitors in March and they wrote back to me telling me that he was ready to accept the proceedings.

I told DG that I have not yet received a written reply from HSBC or DG Solicitors as to whether they will refund me or not...and still havent.

 

The first week in April DG informed me that they had been awaiting 'advice' and upon recieving that 'advice' they would ask their client for instruction. DG informed me the following week that they had informed their clients and that I would have my reply SHORTLY ...a month on and still no reply.

 

hsbcfiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya fiddled, I suspect the delay is due to a corporate problem of no one being willing to sign on the dotted line and admit that you are right and they are wrong even though you have proved it to at least three separate people :rolleyes:.

 

Sooner or later you will find someone with enough balls to write this off :).

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe a nudge letter to let them know you haven't gone away, fiddled?;)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete & Johnny,

 

 

Been emailing- almost on daily basis (but not the last ten days)

 

Decided to go to Solicitors for help - informed DG of the rate per hour that they can add to my claim.

 

fiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha-ha! well done fiddled - I like it......:D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting !! My ML has just resurfaced as well, Im being contacted by CDRU (Central Debt Recovery Unit - A Trading style of MCS - ROFL) demanding Immediate Payment !!!

(Apparently, CDRU specialise 'in cases like mine, where normal recovery options have failed', WHO WRITES THIS CRAP !!!)

 

Just writing a letter telling them im STILL waiting for a signed agreement & CCA'ing them, any other suggestions ??? I got the account put on hold while awaiting investigation by the FOS, but never heard back from them ?!?! Should I phone the Ombudsman ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rhsy. Long time no see.:)

 

If you have been in contact with the FOS about this account in the past then I suggest you contact them again and tell them exactly what they are trying to do.

If the account has been put on hold and it is now officially in dispute then they are commiting an offence by attempting to collect the "debt".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Freaky, nice to see you are still here !!!

 

They sent me a letter saying the account was 'on hold pending investigation' in August last year, but I STILL havent heard anything from the FOS ?!?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...