Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Funding Corporation: successful FOS PPI claim: then car repro, then SD - now claim form HELP!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4031 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thankyou, that is very interesting, on the stat demand it only mentions the bill of sale agreement , not the original credit agreement which i assume could be invalid due to the FOS action against it.

 

GDC

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 18 day deadline is up on saturday so i will be applying for a set-aside on thursday as i have not received a satisfactory response from TFC so far, could anyone give me some pointers on how to fill in the 2 forms and can i simply take them to the court and ask them to witness the affadavit?

Thanks.

GDC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou 42, thats great info.

I have been informed by TFC that they intend to repossess the car to sell against the outstanding balance, i am quite happy for them to do this as the car is in good order and still worth a good price but i'm not sure how it affects the stat demand, should i continue to apply for a set aside or does the repo constitute having come to an agreement with TFC?.

Thanks

GDC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok , car was handed back to TFC over a week ago now, put in my application for set-aside at exeter county court and have a date for 25th june, just need to serve on the TFC representative now.

Do these muppets usually turn up to court or am i going to be a crowd of one??.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, went to court, TFC sent a local solicitor, nice enough guy but had no clue about the case, he brought some paperwork with him that was supposed to be in the post......?..

As the car has not been sold yet, the judge granted an adjournment and didn't seem too happy about the car being sold at a site in leeds instead of somewhere local that would have been cheaper.

So, TFC have until end of october to comply or its back to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have been fighting a car finance company over mis-sold ppi for some time now and the point i have reached is this.

The finance company repaid the ppi premium as per an upheld complaint to the FOS but did not fully comply as they refused to restructure the outstanding balance of finance, as a result of this i refused to make any more payments to them until the situation was resolved.

The finance company then issued me with a statutory demand for around £3000 to which a replied by applying to the court for a set-aside and also agreed to hand back the car to offset as much of the outstanding debt as possible.

At the court hearing the finance company sent a local lawyer who immediatley asked for an adjournment pending the sale of the vehicle which the judge agreed to.

The car was sold at auction and the outstanding amount is now £1250 to which the finance company have added £250 costs from the court hearing ( even though no costs were applied for , or granted) and are refusing to withdraw the stat demand.

I have until the end of october to ask the court to to re consider the setaside or the case will be struck out so the question is , should i keep after the finance company through the court or will they actually attempt to bankrupt me for £1250.

Thanks.

Gavin

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am employed full time, i don't own my home and i have no savings.

I also have 4 dependants and own 2 fairly old cars.

Also to clarify, i'm not trying to avoid paying anyone but the finance company were in the wrong to begin with , hence the upheld complaint with the fos so i am fully prepared to go back to court, i'm just gauging opinion if its worth the effort and if it could be in the interests of the finance company to attempt to bankrupt me for just over a grand or if they would let it go to collection.

GDC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite unusual for a company to threaten BR where the defendant has virtually no assets. It's a double edged sword really because BR fees are almost £500 if you declare yourself BR but much higher if a comapany does it. Might be worth writing to them explaining your situation (a rough outline will do, don't give them too much info).

 

Would your job or house be at risk if you were made BR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are a long way beyond 'letters explaining', this has been ongoing for almost 3 years now and only came to a head when the company was forced to pay me almost £4000 in mis-sold ppi.

My house is a council house and i am a lorry driver by trade so bankruptcy would not make any real difference on that front, the finance company in question are persistent liars and use very suspect business methods so i'm not confident that they (or one employee in particular) would not attempt proceedings out of pure spite.

I'm confident that i have a very good case for set-aside and they have had the car back which should go towards the "fair offer of settlement " part of the stat demand but its another day off work and more time spent peparing a case and i have spent more than enough time arguing with these idiots, its just going round the houses all the time with the company refusing to finally admit they were wrong despite a fairly strong telling off from the FOS ( they attempted to re-write financial law) .

GDC

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand your situation but the SD has to be taken seriously unless they contact you in WRITING to advise that they are discontinuing. Even then, I'd go for a wasted costs order against them but it's your choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

i received a full refund of ppi through the ombudsman in mid 2011,

i then handed the car back to them (FC) which they transported from devon to manchester??

to sell as they issued a repossession order against me.

 

After a few months they issued a default statement against me,

i took them to the county court to have it reversed and the judge told the lawyer they had sent that he was wasting everyones time

and that FC were on shaky ground having already lost a claim against them through the FOC,

 

i didn't hear anything from them for about a year and then received a standard issue 'you owe us money blah blah' letter.

 

Today i received a money claim issued through NCC claiming just over a thousand pounds

and threatening repossession of a car that was returned almost 2 years ago.

 

I intend to dispute this and have registered with MCOL

but the site says i should have a claim no/password issued with the defence pack

but i can't figure out which one is which.

 

...i have tried to register on the day i received it (today).

.is it too early?.

..thanks

Gav

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have merged your various thread with these people

and you most recent post on someones elses thread

please keep to this thread

with any more issues/question

 

posting on threads +2yrs old will see you get no replies.

 

use this one now

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

your post is 2 msgs up.

 

your post 35 here

was posted to this thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?80677-The-Funding-Corporation-PPI&p=3854195#post3854195

which was not your one [ no worries easy made mistake]

I have moved it [its post 35 above]

 

to show the whole story of your dealings with the TFC

I have merged 5 threads that were all about its passed

 

and now you are here with the claim form latest.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...