Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's a GR Yaris - Finance is with Alphera, who are part of BMW I believe. I'm sure the unit is very expensive to repair, I have even told them I would be happy with a refurbished/reconditioned unit, in trying to be reasonable as well.
    • Without seeing this envelope, document and sticker it is impossible to advise properly. However, just going on what you have told us, there are two ways you can deal with this: !. The easy way. This has the lowest risk but the guarantee of a penalty for speeding.  You can respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box you can explain that you responded to the request for driver’s details but it was recently returned to you, seemingly not actioned. However, you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. You could also ask the court to consider sentencing you at the fixed penalty level (£100 and 3 points) as this prosecution seems to be the result of an administrative problem outside your control. 2. The not so easy way with higher risk. This could see you convicted of the FtP charge but has the possibility that you escape with no penalty whatsoever. You can do the same – plead not guilty to both charges. You can mention in the “Reasons” box that you returned the request for driver’s details as required. If you go down this route the speeding charge cannot succeed as they have no evidence you were driving. This comes from your response to the request for driver’s details which the police say they have not got. You will then face a trial for the FtP charge and you can produced your response together with the envelope and sticker showing it had been returned to you. The risk with this is that if your defence fails you will be fined a week and a half’s net income, pay a “Victim Surcharge” of 40% of the fine, pay prosecution costs of around £650 and have six points together with an endorsement code (MS90) which will see your insurance premiums rocket.  
    • Probably very expensive to replace what car and model who is your finance with ?   Andy
    • Topic moved to Financial legal Issues forum in view of the claim form. Topic title updated Please continue to post here, Andy   .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank Charges on Benefits


Guest littlesally
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest littlesally

Not sure where to post this as I could not find a benefits thread.

I work with the homeles, most of which are on benefits.

Recently I helped one of the girls get her charges back. It was only one charge and after a few phone calls to Natwest, quoting bits about it being illegal to take money from benefits, the refunded.

Now I am helping a man try to get £38 refunded from RBS.

So far all RBS have said to him is - don't phone, go in to your branch.

Then in branch said it was rubbish and they can take benfits.

He took in something I found about it saying they couldn't/shouldn't but they still said that it is not true.

The branch said to phone but the answer would still be no. They said as the benefit was late being paid in, he should claim the charge from the DSS.

 

As he only gets about £50 a week you can imagine the hardship this has caused. He has not been able to pay the daily £2.50 we charge at the nightshelter (the council insist we charge this) so has had to sleep on the streets.

 

I have looked for a letter about claiming back benefit money, but can only see one about tax credits, and can't find the extreme hardship letter - although I believe that is meant to be sent before the money is taken.

 

Any help will be much appreciated, greatfully recieved and much needed.

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sally,

I dont work for RBS but I expect that all banks are the same in most ways! Why did the man you are helping get charged in the first place, was it due to returned DD or going over an agreed over draft? It make a difference what the charges were for!

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Oh, sorry missed that out.

He set up a standing order for £5 to be transferred from one account to another (both his) It was the first transfer. He has now cancelled and will do it himself.

 

Saly x

Link to post
Share on other sites

He needs to go into the branch - they will try to fob him off! The bank i work for would say the same thing that if the credit was late then the charges should be claimed from the creditor. This is because they dont want to do the paperwork!!!! However RBS like all banks have the ability to remove charges as good will gestures, especially as it was an internal (made to an account within RBS banking system not for example HSBC)transfer that was missed. Sound like you need to corner a cusotmer service advisor in branch even the manager will do and ask them to review the account. The should be able to refund especally if this is the first time its happened. If not then formally ask for a refund in writing also requesting a copy of their complaints procedure, If they still insist on charging him then ask for a right of appropriation to stop them taking the charg out of benifits that are paid in to the acct whilst you make a complaint. Might also help to mention you if pushed will inform the FSA and banking ombadsman and drop a hint to a local news paper especially in light of recent trend to claim bank charges back! Good Luck with them, good luck to the man your trying to help as well!

 

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

But is the taking of benefits legally wrong, and is there a letter saying this?

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Bank Charges and Benefits and the First Right of Appropriation

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

 

I am writing to you following several charges debited from my account totalling £xxxx on (date).

 

Bank charges are unlawful penalties for breach of contract. However, the bank or building society is only allowed to charge you what it costs to cover their administrative charges. If they charge you more than this, you may have a legal right to get back the difference.

Notably, and in my instance, if the income in an account comes from benefits, they are also contrary to the legislation relating to benefits. If the income is from incapacity benefit, job seekers allowance, etc , they are contrary to section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. The working of this Act comes under the Treasury and the Department of Work and Pensions, respectively and are quoted below for your immediate attention.

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors

 

When you open an account with a bank or building society and use their services, you are entering into a contract. The law says that the bank or building society must carry out its business:-

• with reasonable care and skill.

 

If the service is unsatisfactory you may be entitled to compensation if the contract has been broken. I believe that there has been a breach of contract as I feel your organisation has failed to handle my affairs with reasonable care and skill.

 

This failure on your behalf has caused me a great deal of hardship. I am left with no means to pay the rent/bills due to the unauthorised amount now outstanding. The incoming amounts due to be deposited into my account next week will only clear the amount outstanding leaving little if any to pay the rent, for housekeeping or utility bills such as gas.

 

I ask for a little compassion and request that the benefit amounts totalling £xxxx, debited in order to pay for your default charges, be refunded by return.

 

I am also writing to inform you that I am due to have the following payments made into my account:-

  • Tax Credit payment of £xxx on xx/xx/xx
  • Child Benefit payment of £xxx on x/xx/xx
  • Incapacity Benefit payment of £xxx on x/xx/xx

Totalling £xxxx,

 

I wish to use my first right of appropriation for this money, for the following purposes;

Rent £xx

Utilities bills £xx

Housekeeping money £xx

I will withdraw the money on the day that it is deposited for the above use, and I would be grateful if you would ensure that any other payments out of my account do not interfere with this withdrawal.

 

Yours faithfully,

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Ok, have left a letter for him to collect, but made a few changes to it as he is on Income Support - I am guessing that the law covers that as well - and his outgoings do not include utility bills or housekeeping money, but laundry, bus fare to apply for jobs and view flats/bedsits and lunch.

Hope that's right,

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

made a few changes to it as he is on Income Support - I am guessing that the law covers that as well -

Yes, income support is an income related benefit as defined under s123 of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

finally found something about benefits and bank charges, so to would be grateful to know which benefits are protected from being taken as penalties etc.

 

OK I understand that invalidity benefit is an income related benefit, where does DLA fit into this, is this also a benefit that should not have charges taken? the person in question gets - Invalidity Benefit - long term rate, DLA at full level for both parts and housing benefit, she has a notional right to claim income support, but because of the other benefits does not get any (there is a letter to this effect somewhere).

 

any advice and pointers greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I understand that invalidity benefit is an income related benefit, where does DLA fit into this, is this also a benefit that should not have charges taken?

Yes. They can use their First Right of Appropriation for this.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you rory - now have some more ammunition to get things sorted for my daughter! Cant believe how much they have taken from her in the months that she has been so very ill and not able to deal with her finances, and it has all snowballed to what appear to be unmanageable proportions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

RBS wrote back and said until the test case they are not paying out any requests for charges.

He has sent another letter pointing out that they must have mis-interrupted the letter as the request was for benefits back and the test case has nothing to do with that.

Also inclosed a break down of out goings and said it is the first charge ever incurred.

Worded it as a friendly letter rather than a legal type.

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS are a nasty lot to deal with at the moment. They really are abusing their powers so I think perhaps a full written complaint to the FSO would be in order, the case clearly isn't linked to the Test Case and the bank are breaching their obligations.

 

I'd also advise your friend to try to get a Natwest Step account set up - it's a basic bank account and should give him a cash/debit card to use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

This is taking a little longer than it should as the person concerned is homeless and tends to dissappear for a few days or a week at a time.

There is what looks like a reply from RBS waiting for him,

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok further update (still talkin to myself?)

just recieved a letter from Nationwide acknowledging the FOS complaint letter, NW state their 8 weeks exspires 17 jan 08

in the mean time they ask that i fill in a ' income and expenditure form'

i'll assume this is standard? and i should fill it out? and enclose a covering letter stating my case?

should i still get S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)? see other thread, all i've done so far is call FOS

anything else?

p s to MOD's if i reposted this too many times, please delete those incorrectly placed

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I understand that invalidity benefit is an income related benefit

 

Not sure whether this changes things or not but Invalidity Benefit (now called Incapacity Benefit) is not income based.

 

Incapacity Benefit - Dicover Your Options

 

Best of luck and kudos on being such a helpful person!

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news! Well done, you!

 

And thanks for the lovely rep comment - my first one! *blush*

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...