Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council tax, bristow and a friend in need


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, having had the fantastic help from people on this site a while back, I am sincerely hoping someone can help a friend of mine. She is dealing with a council tax debt of which she was paying £44 weekly (she struggled with this) but paid every week. During postal strike she had sent the payment, which obviously was late, she had bailiffs at the door. Which also was the day after her fathers funeral. The original debt was £697.89. She can't really remember signing anything and can not find paper work to say. She had however a notice of seizure, W fee £12, redeem goods £24.50, Levy £46 total £780.39.

Have a signiture and a phone number.

 

Then important notice of seizure, saying no charge for visit yet debt is stated as £969.39, also a signiture and a phone number. My friend has tried to phone but is having no luck with an answer.

 

I hope someone can help her. I am just trying to give her a helping hand and would be grateful if I could exchange phone numbers with someone to speak to her directly as she is at wits end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the bailiffs ever entered her house?

It may be useful if she could arrange to pay the council direct (although some may not agree to it). How long has she been paying the £44, and has she got proof that she sent payment when the strike was on? She will need to know how much extra there is on the original debt (after her instalments) to work out how much they are charging.

 

It doesn't sound right, and I'm not sure ringing the bailiffs would help if she is stressed, they will not necessarily be helpful, just demand payment.

 

Make sure she knows she is not on her own and try to be calm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response. Yes i am sure they entered, I think they followed her through the door. She is not 100% sure but she might have signed ( she had buried her father, so head not in right place, which she told them)

She told them about posting payment they basically said tough it was late. We really would appreciate if someone could talk to her directly. Obviously she knows more than I do, I am just trying to help her get started some how, some where.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she mentioned that to them then I am pretty sure they should have turned round and left it til a leter date, pretty sure have seen it somewhere. Sounds pretty typical of these lowlifes.

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest she contact Citizen's advice Bureau who know about these sorts of things, and can support her. I may not be the best person as I am dealing with my own case and don't have all the answers currently, although I know when something is wrong!

 

If she was paying instalments direct to the council, it might be worth her ringing them to ask them to take the debt back to keep the bailiffs off her back while the other issues are dealt with. As I said, particularly if she is stressed, ringing the bailiffs themselves would not help, she would get the same reaction as the 'tough'.

 

Maybe someone else will reply to you given time, (depends who is on) but she must not panic as some bailiffs may rely on that to get what they want, whether charges are correct or not. Scare tactics.

 

CAB are a good option, they - unfortunately - deal with this sort of thing all the time. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your friends best bet is to write a letter to the bailiff company and let them know what has happened etc. I would also let them know that you are forwarding the letter to the council as you feel the account has not been handled properly. I would also advise speaking to the council and let them know the situation, they may be able to get them off your friends back.

 

Other things to do in meantime would be to check if the bailiff is certificated. ( let us know if unsure how to do this )

 

Also ask the bailiffs for a breakdown of any charges added to the account. And request a copy of the walking possesion order ( if there is one )

 

Keep us posted.

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear to me that your friend had bailiff around just following her father being buried.

 

ALL contracts that I have ssen make it CLEAR that your friend would be seen as "vulnerable". ie: the death of a close family relative. To my mind, the bailiff SHOULD NOT HAVE come into the house. He has "levied" upon goods and due entirely to a late payment under this agreement, he is now attempting to charge further fees.

 

Due to your friend's circumstances, I would advise issuing a formal complaint...immediately. She also needs to send a Subject Access Request (a breakdown of the fees charged).

 

At first glance this would appear to be yet another example where vulnerabe people are being exploited by bailiffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank all of you for your replies. When I was in this position with bailiffs, citizens advice said they could not help as it had gone too far ( so I think this option is a waste of time), then I was referred to this site by my father-in-law. The people here were fantastic and mine is now being re dealt with by the council, who also at the time said it was not their business.

 

We are not sure how to check certification of bailiffs, this was done by someone on this site for me, so I have never done this.

 

Am I wrong in assuming that if she goes online and makes payment through the council website and it goes through that technically they then have taken the debt back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not always a good idea it depends on the situation, is it this years debt they are trying to collect or is it for a previous year?

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just that if its a previous year then there is no way of knowing for sure which years debt the money will go to. So its probably not the way to go at this stage.

As previously states its best to contact the council and also write a letter to bailiffs, a copy of which should be forwarded to the council.

 

TomTubby has plenty of good advice and can help check certification.

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you let me have the name of the bailiff, I can check whether or not they are certificated.

 

It is not fair to put the name of the bailiff on the public forum, so if anyone wants a search undertaken, it is best to do this by private message.

 

It must be understood that the information is only as accurate as provided by the individual courts that grant certificates and although errors can occur...they are very rare indeed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...