Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
    • scared of what? you simply jumped at turnstile.... it's not a prison sentence and done very doubtfully of any criminal. exuberance of youth stupid act at very very worst it will be a warning letter if anything ever happens ..means nothing going fwd. dx          
    • Hi, everyone. I received a letter from TfL investigator/Prosecutor. The letter reads as follow:   ''Thank you for responding to our enquiry letter. Your comments will be taken into consideration when reviewing whis case and we will contact you as soon as we have reached a decision. TfL now consider prosecution against passengers who are in breach of all TfL byelaw offences and I must inform you that further legal action may be taken. TfL byelaws can be found at ... Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can assist you further.''   The letter was sent 23 days after I replied to them. Should I send another begging letter to IAP? I'm extremely scared now. Thanks all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bank charges-financial hardship


hammy43
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5751 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone, this is my first posting its took me over two years to claim back due to ill health...just received letter from bank saying claim is stayed until oft ruling - but now trying to claim back under financial hardship - i read somewhere about stating a consumer act.........but cant find it to put with letter back to natwest bank stating my case under this act

can anyone help?

will let you all know how i get on as now i will follow through until the end

sandra

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hammy! Have a read of the links in my signature for information on the OFT test case and how it affects you. There is also information on how to apply for the stay to be lifted. Just have a read through it and then come back to this thread with any questions.

 

I have asked for this thread to be moved to the Natwest forum where you will get more specific help with your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hammy :)

I am also trying to claim back charges under Financial Hardship and I sent them a letter stating this (posted below) I was even prepared to settle for 2 thousand pounds less but they dont want know. I got the standard reply back today "OFT case, take it to FOS or Court but we'll stop it anyway!!"

I am now scratching my head as what to do next?

Regards :)

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Re. Account number: XXXXXXXX/ XX-XX-XX

I refer to default charges applied to my account amounting to £XXXX.XX., which I have requested you pay back.

I wrote to you on 16th July 2007, making the original request for a payment in settlement of my claim and I have not heard from you.

I am aware of the OFT ruling and I am writing to you again under the hardship waiver. I am a single unemployed parent and the only incomes I receive are benefits, Child Tax Credit and Income support. I am a full time carer for my two disabled children and I also receive Carer’s Allowance and Disability Living Allowance on their behalf. The charges you applied to my account came out of these benefits and my children’s DLA allowance which was paid into my account on their behalf .I am writing to inform you I intend to claim the full amount claimed together with interest up to the date of judgment and court fees in the proceedings through the county court.

This is based on the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations, as I believe these default charges are unfair and not proportionate to your costs, and the Social Security Administration Act 1992, which says banks must not take charges from benefits as this money is needed for a person to live on. Therefore I believe the County Court will rule in my favor.

I have attached a full schedule of the charges and interest with this document.

 

Without prejudice

The charges and interest I have claimed above total £X,XXX.XX. However, if you are prepared to pay to me £X,XXX.XX within 14 days of the date of this letter, I am prepared to accept this lower figure in full and final settlement of my claim and interest as I am suffering severe financial hardship.

I look forward for a full response to this letter within 14 days; otherwise I will commence court proceedings to reclaim my money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Additionally, you may find some of the info in this thread useful: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/115023-application-removal-stay-grounds.html

 

Best of luck x :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a phone call to FOS yesterday and explained my situation and the reply I had from Natwest. They explained they were no longer in a position to get my charges back until after the test case but they would be sending some forms out for me to fill in and they would look at it to see if they could help in any other way, like getting my rent paid?

I am not sure how this is going to work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

the link at the bottom reference A&L may be of interest to you in particular.

 

 

 

 

It was part of the agreement between the FSA/OFT and the banks that although current claims would be "stayed" that "hardship " cases would be filtered through.

 

If you feel that SINCE THE WAIVER you have

1) appealed against a stay on this basis and been refused

 

(Just to clarify, the courts have a right to stay any case but banks should

not apply for a stay in cases of hardship.)

 

2) contacted your bank and asked to be considered on this basis and been refused

3) had been offered a settlement which has now been retracted

 

if you feel this applies to you please pm me or post details here. I am trying to help CRFX250 collect data to send to the FSA. He is trying to gather evidence in order to make them consider lifting the Waiver which is due for review.

 

Here is a link to the proceedure the banks were supposed to adhere to

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Re...ction_disp.pdf

 

And also an extract from the website announcement.

  • Consumers who have received a final response from the bank/building society which does not include an offer
    Consumers still have the option of complaining to FOS. However, the banks and building societies have also requested that the FOS does not consider any complaints about unauthorised overdraft charges until resolution of the test case.
  • Consumers who are in very difficult financial circumstances - 'hardship cases'
    Banks and building societies will have to conduct a filtering process to ensure that cases of genuine hardship are still dealt with during the waiver period. Cases of hardship would still be entitled to be referred to, and dealt with by, the FOS.

__________________

 

:-) This is also a useful thread to read Success at A and L via hardship case route

 

 

 

thanks

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also try getting your Mp on board. Make an appointment for him to come to you due to the difficulties with the children. He will then see how you are struggling. Ask him to write to the bank on your behalf. Worth a try ?

 

Chris:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

hi there currently trying to reclaim charges under financial hardship.halifax sent me the forms to fill in about my finacial position and also i sent them other eveidence like repossesion on my house council tax arrears and court dates.i have had no correspondance from them for over 2 months so i called them,the advisor said she would put an urgent on my claim and get someone to deal with it.nothing happened so i wrote another letter last week explaining that no one has responded to me in any way,and still i havent heard a thing,so i wanted to know is their any time limit banks must make some kind of response? any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hammy :)

Social Security Administration Act 1992, which says banks must not take charges from benefits as this money is needed for a person to live on. Therefore I believe the County Court will rule in my favor.

I have attached a full schedule of the charges and interest with this document.

 

 

Hi, I think you should read this....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/125278-social-security-administration-act.html

 

Unfortunately, in any financial jargon where the term, 'charges' are stated.... it appears bank charges are never ever what are intimated.

 

I was caught out by the fact many CAG members still believe that the social security act can be used as a WMD against the banks when claiming, during the OFT case, based on 'financial hardship' arguments....

 

Doesn't work, they're still under no obligation to repay the money....yet...What I intend to do is wait until I see the banks next response to a letter I sent outlining the fact I am on JSA, benefits are set by the government as the minimum amount of money an individual needs to live on, and outlining my case. I also added a comment by the FSA that stated all complaints that involve financial hardship should still be looked at.

 

If they still refuse, I shall further my complaint to the FSA and the FSO. I shall then continue with the claim, which will most likely involve a removal of a stay as mentioned in the above posts. We'll see what happens with that...

 

I strongly don't believe that I have paid NI and tax for 10 years (may seem like a short time to some...), only for Natwest to literally remove my ability to feed myself purely to satisfy their shareholders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there currently trying to reclaim charges under financial hardship.halifax sent me the forms to fill in about my finacial position and also i sent them other eveidence like repossesion on my house council tax arrears and court dates.i have had no correspondance from them for over 2 months so i called them,the advisor said she would put an urgent on my claim and get someone to deal with it.nothing happened so i wrote another letter last week explaining that no one has responded to me in any way,and still i havent heard a thing,so i wanted to know is their any time limit banks must make some kind of response? any advice would be greatly appreciated

 

You need to start a thread in the Halifax Bank of Scotland part of the forum and you will get advice on this one.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...