Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's normally that information is usually given how it is stored. I.E. if kept physical then physical copies get sent out. If kept digital then digital copies get sent out. It's the idea that the information you get back is exactly how they keep it and exactly how they hold your data. It's why you'll quite often see screenshots of CRM systems on SARs and such
    • I think final version of WS now prepared with exhibits added.  All numbered properly. Of course it can still be tweaked if necessary. Laura will not need it on 25 June as that is just a Preliminary Hearing for her to represent her son. But as DCBL messed up and thought it was WS time why not prepare things calmly in advance. Defendant's WS - versione 3 + attachments.pdf
    • Your case shows the idiocy of employing a solicitor to do things you could easily do yourself. Had Countryside dealt with their own case they would have entered judgement on 4 June and there would have been no way back for you. But they thought they were clever by running to Rachael and Sean of BW Legal for a more "professional" (aye, right) service.  These dodgy solicitors can only make money on private parking cases by doing everything on the ultra cheap and certainly cant check the judgement date for every single separate case. Ho!  Ho!  Ho! Anyway, glad you got the defence filed OK. The next stage is that the central bulk court will send out a simple form called a Directions Questionnaire to you and to Countrywide which is part of the allocations process to your local court.  If you read this short thread you will see all the stages of the court process  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406892-highview-parking-anpr-pcn-claimform-urban-exchange-manchester-claim-dismissed/#comments
    • It is already trespass, nothing further needed to make out trespass. Not sure where ‘interference with goods’ helps you / how you’d bring a claim for that that stops them parking there.
    • Thanks Dx,    For some further information, the holiday was booked as a package holiday for 2. One of the 2 had to be changed, and changing costs £700 for a new flight as "tickets had been issued and they cant do a name change". I cant quite figure out how compensation works for things when it comes to package holidays.    From what I can tell  - The plane was due to land in Turks and Caicos to drop off passengers, something happened during descent, resulting in technical fault.  - The rest of the original flight from Turks & Caicos -> Montego Bay was cancelled  - A New flight was put on today, which was then delayed by 1.5hrs aswell  - Hotel was provided for the night after much hassle.  - 1.5 days, 2 evenings of holiday lost  If I understand correctly, since the original flight (LHR -> Turks -> Montego Bay) was cancelled, they are both entitled to a refund on that full flight? I can't quite work out if they are only entitled to a refund for the equivalent of Turks -> Montego Bay, or for the full LHR->Turks->Montego Bay, since it was issued as one ticket/all Virgin, and they should have arrived yesterday..?)  I can't work out how to get the cost of that compensation, or whether its a set figure, and how the loss of days of holiday is factored in   I am aware:  If you received less than 14 days’ notice of the cancellation, you are generally due compensation, awarded in pounds or euros depending on where your flight was due to depart from, according to the following scale: £220 / €250 for all flights of 1,500km or less (e.g. Glasgow to Amsterdam); £350 / €400 for all flights between 1,500km and 3,500km (e.g. East Midlands to Marrakech); £520 / €600 for all other flights (e.g. London to New York). Compensation will be reduced by 50% if the arrival time of the replacement flight doesn’t exceed the arrival time of the original flight by: two hours for flights of 1,500km or less; three hours for flights between 1,500km and 3,500km; four hours for all other flights. So I "think" its £520pp for the flight part as compensation (7500km)... but some sites say its a full refund for the flight... is it both?  Thanks,  Ryan  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Rock


Murada
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If they dont send you the CCA then the debt in unenforcable. so far this year I have had 2 loans of £2k and £2.7k wiped out because of the banks being unable to provide the CCA. Now NRock have also not sent me the CCA so I sent them a letter stating that they can now stick it. If you want I can post a copy of that letter for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I havent paid them for about 5 months. They kept phoning me and sending me letters, but as long as they dont send a cca then they arent getting a penny.

if they ever do produce the cca then I will send them a budget sheet that shows i can only afford £5 per month. (I will also say that other creditors have agreed to accept such payments). the worst case senario is I p ay them £5 per month, but I dont expect to hear from them again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a copy of the 'you can stick it' letter that has got me out of a few debts

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account/Reference Number *****

 

 

As you are aware, on August 2nd I wrote to you via recorded delivery, which was delivered on the 03/08/2007, requesting a true copy of the signed credit agreement. I am entitled to this under the terms of sec’s. 77(1) and 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA) 1974, I also enclosed the statutory maximum fee of £1 in the form of a postal order.

You wrote back acknowledging my letter and stating that a full copy would be “forwarded to me within 28 days”. In the mean time you have repeatedly bullied me into agreeing to payment commitments I could not afford.

 

To this date I have not been provided with a signed agreement under the consumer credit act within the required time frame, despite my properly formatted and paid for request.

I assume you are familiar with the consumer credit act and therefore well aware that the debt is legally unenforceable if an executed agreement cannot be provided within a certain timeframe. This timeframe has now passed, (as has the timeframe of 28 days stipulated by yourself).

 

I therefore do not acknowledge any “debt” to Northern Rock plc and I will not be making any payment against this "debt" as it is now unenforceable. I would also like to remind you that failure to comply with a CCA request is a criminal offence under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act, which I have reported to the appropriate authorities, including but not limited to the Office of Fair Trading, Trading Standards and the Financial Ombudsman. Also non compliance with the original request is therefore a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

The Office of Fair Trading, Trading Standards and the Financial Ombudsman have been notified of your failure to comply with a CCA request and that you and/or representatives have committed a criminal offence under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act

I have been advised by Citizens Advice to record any further calls from Northern Rock and pass details of the calls onto the above authorities. They have also told me to pass any further letters from Northern Rock onto the same above authorities.

 

I have also taken legal advice and have been told that as this debt is now unenforceable, any further contact from Northern Rock will be deemed as harassment and will result in legal action against yourselves.

I know that you will write to me threatening legal action. I am happy for this to go to court as you will have to stand before the judge and admit to committing offences under The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

You may also decide to pass this onto a debt collection agency. As you have failed to comply with a CCA request, this will be seen as continued harassment from Northern Rock and you will be in further breach of the Credit Consumer Act of 1974.

I urge you to read the whole of this letter very carefully. As, as of today, the

18th September 2007, I no longer acknowledge any debt to you as you have clearly committed offences in repeatedly breaching The Consumer Credit Act 1974 .

Any further requests for payment from you or your representatives will be thrown straight in the bin and reported to the above trading offices, and any visits by collections agents will be refused and reported to the above trading offices.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This is interesting.

Please see my post on northern rock.

 

They got a CCJ on me but i never knew to ask for a CCA and now they have sold the debt to Link, who i have now asked for CCA

 

Link also say they own as well as the debt, the CCJ which only they have the power to remove

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...