Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mummybird V Barclays


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5962 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

_40371109_grid300_getty.jpg

 

That one in the car will win...

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Slickwilly,

Sorry about your roof - Kent's a long way from sunny Wales but will speak to my daughter. My OH comes from Broadstairs. We had a spell working as Housekeeper/Butler to a family near Canterbury.

My OH is obviously hoping for Lewis to win. He's had a tough time hasn't he? Now to get on with my paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB,

 

It's a small world innit! Only kidding when I saw about YOU working on roof. I'll do my own in time.

 

Fingers X'd for Lewis - I think he's had a couple of recent set-backs in an otherwise amazing and seemingly simple season. And if he don't geddit this time, he will v soon.

 

Now get on with that paperwork ! LoL

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm being good and doing my paperwork, but I've can't find the link that gives a list of settled cases for each bank - it gives claim no. date and amount. I found it once for HSBC - but no luck today. Can anybody direct me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask for an opinion. I know we all think our own kids are the most brilliant,clever and loving in the world but......

My lovely Natalie has has a hard life - a drunken abusive father, an injury caused thro stepping on broken glass in the river, which eventually put her in a wheelchair at 17. A scholarship to a public school and studying at OU for a Science degree. An operation at 20 years repaired her injury and she's has razzed since then with drug and booze kids, and now a crusade to save old people from a life of hell in care homes. She bought her own house and ran into financial probs., always kept in touch with Barclays, but they s..... on her. What I'm saying is - Is there any point in trying to use the human angle with Judge Hendicott on Tuesday - I promise not to ramble but I know I can speak well, probably with a slight tremor (!!!) I do feel strongly about this - does anybody think its worth a try?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a lot she has had to put up with, she deserves to do well, trust Barclays to throw a spanner in the works! As much as I would love to say that the judge would be influenced by the human circumstances here, I am afraid even if he was, I seriously don't think the stay will be lifted, and thats not because of the judge, they have all been instructed not to pay out any more claims until the OFT case is resolved. Our judge went into lengthy details of the OFT case, and told us that even if he lifted the stay we would not get a hearing til after the case in January and even then that the OFT case will not end then, because it will go to appeal and the Lords and it may even go as far as Europe, all this could take up to 2 years, so I am not saying don't try, but be prepared for this. By the way don't bother too much about the taking the whole bundle, your skeleton argument and POC and witness statement, list of expenditure, copies of all correspondence, I think thats about the main things, ANYONE ELSE WANT TO ADD TO THIS???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mummmybird,

 

I've had a look back through your thread. You and daughter have done really well, given all the circumstances. However, my opinion is that this is not relevant to the case.

 

The focus here should be on you having fully complied with the court's orders and Barclays NOT doing so. They've tried to make out they never rec'd your new POC from court and THAT was the reason they failed to file further defence.

 

If the court sent out the POC, it should be deemed as rec'd by bank . In my opinion, the fact that they lost it or say they never rec'd it is THEIR problem.

 

THAT is how I would focus my efforts on the day because the human angle, as you put it, really has no bearing on the issues before court.

 

That said, having read your post, I wish you the very best and hope there is justice waiting for both you and your daughter.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB, wishing you best of luck on Tues. I agree with Olden, having been with her at our hearing Friday. We had judge hickinbottom, he was very fair and explained in great lenghts the pros and cons of the stay being lifted for us and quite honestly, what he said was correct. If you were to get stay lifted, the chances of full hearing before test case conclusion would be second to none so nothing to be gained. Dont be afraid to speak in your own language but you have to wait until he gives you the nod to speak. We asked for the penalty charges to be supressed until the outcome of test case, he asked the barclays solicitor at great lengths on this, her response was that it would be too cost effective for b's to do as they would have to check our accounts manually!!! he was not impressed with this ans but did not agree to it. Although we didnt get what we wanted, and he also understood that we had missed out getting our money as he agreed that before the test case b's were paying out he said that he would be writting to us with his full reasons for turning us down after he had heard a few more cases but that we would get the letter by next week. He also added that the letter would be to our benefit. As Val (Olden) said, dont worry too much about your bundle, barclays sol. did not even want mine so that was a waste of time, jot down some points that you want to get across - good luck xx jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

My lovely Natalie has has a hard life - a drunken abusive father, an injury caused thro stepping on broken glass in the river, which eventually put her in a wheelchair at 17.

Is there any point in trying to use the human angle with Judge Hendicott on Tuesday - I promise not to ramble but I know I can speak well, probably with a slight tremor (!!!) I do feel strongly about this - does anybody think its worth a try?

 

Good Luck Honey.

I so wish you and Natalie well.

Human angle ?, it sucks.

The banks have this sown up right now.

Give it a try anyway.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everybody, for your support and kind words. I printed down the settled cases. There have been only two since August 14th. both for Syds mum on the 24th.Aug. No amount specified. I think there are one or two more and shall have a good look through the posts today and see what I can find.xxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everybody,

Nearly there, should finish ahead of the Grand Prix! Shame about the Rugby yesterday. Just hope Lewis doesn't take any undue risks today.

A bit more advice needed.

I'm preparing my statement together with a timetable of events.

i.e date started (January), transfered first to Carmarthen then Cardiff. I think I've put all my points pretty well except for the following...........

Took my amended POC to Cardiff 8th June, did not get to see Judge until 9th Aug. How can I say that two months passed before seeing him and therefore went past OFT's ruling. I don't want to appear any way insulting to the Judge,but I think its important. Please reply to me before the Grand Prix.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB,

 

Sorry but how are you likely to insult judge here or am I miising something (again). lol

 

What a fantastic race - shame about the result !

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a shame about the GP, but something about two of the cars running on warm fuel?? on the news this am. It seems Mclarens are on the case and should their complaint be upheld, Lewis will move up two places and then be World Champ.

What I meant about my case was that it took two months after I filed my amended POC to get round to the judge seeing me- which seemed an awfuil long time and could have affected my chances, because it was after the OFT ruling by that time.Don't forget the Barclays B.........., is trying to get me on two counts - thry didn't receive amended POC and the OFT ruling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB,

 

I heard that too - use of cooled fuel - don't see it changing results now though or when they finish investigation in a week or two.

 

Ok, I'm with you now. The point here is whether bank rec'd POC from court. If judge thinks they did and they then failed to respond in time, you should be given judgement.

 

Just put down the relevant dates on your timetable - judge can't be offended by that.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure the DJ recognizes the banks have put the system into overload meltdown and will take this into consideration if Bs try to use the non receipt of new poc.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB, in our hearing last friday, I pointed out to the Judge that we had waited so long for a hearing and then the test case was announced. He admitted that that was unfortunate and that the banks were paying out before going to court. So I would just say that! Good Luck x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm back and banging my head against a brick wall - with a vodka in one hand and ciggie in the other.

I failed to beat the Barclays b..............

On the first count Judge Hendicott wiped the floor with Barclays when he said he hadn't rec.POC's. Asked him why he hadn't bothered to turn up on 9th.Aug. Little weasel said he couldn't say. Judge said "Why not?" Weasel said "Because I dont know". He told weasel I'd done everything correctly and he was very nice to me.

So you can imagine I was getting hopeful, but no

the Judge then said he still had to abide by the OFT ruling.

So I had little to argue about the POC's.

But I did make a few points about the set aside - based on our usual arguments.

The Judge then asked how much it had cost me today - I said just travelling from Port Talbot -- about £10.00. He ordered Barclays to pay these travelling expenses and the weasel even argued about that at length, which exasperated the Judge. I was scheduled to see Judge Carson today but it was changed at the last minute. Would Judge Carson have ruled differently I wonder.

As we left the building weasel tried to chat to me and said "I have a bank account too you know" I was speechless - thought of lots of thinks to say on the way home - to late!

Anyway folks - I'm trying to get myself together, even if it is under the table!!!

So thinking ahead - we know this rests with a High Court Judge. Is there a jury? Dare I say this? Do you think the masonic lot will be at work?

Can we get more publicity? Who will fight our corner.

Love to you all thanks for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB,

 

Sounds like you did yourself proud at court and the Weasel got a kicking. The £10.00 was a token gesture but a rather nice way for the judge to make known who he felt was right.

 

You were always going to be struggling to avoid the Stay today but you represented yourself and CAG very well. As Saintly says, your day will come.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MB don't bang your head too hard, weird isn't it how all the judges seem to be on our side, I thought they administered justice? wonder how they got their hands tied?

 

Well done you took on the big boys, piece of cake:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

my sympathies with you MB, seem to know exactly how you feel. At least you got a tenner out of b's, hope it accrues the 8% interest or did he hand you the cash! The experience will go round and round in your head for days, thinking if only I said so and so, but at the end of the day looks like we just have to sit and wait for the result of the test case next year xx Jenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...